The 9/11 Phone Calls: Disturbing Irregularities Uncovered in the Calls that Flashed around the World

NEW YORK, May 16, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- America first learned of the 9/11 hijackings from Solicitor-General Ted Olson, who reported two calls from his wife, well-known CNN commentator Barbara Olson.
From American Airlines Flight 77, Barbara Olson fleshed out the drama of diminutive Muslim hijackers using knives and box-cutters to herd dozens of passengers to the rear of the plane.
These and other reported calls have now been examined by the 9/11 Consensus Panel of scientists, pilots, professors, attorneys, and journalists.
The Panel began its research in 2011 with the Twin Towers and the sudden, stunning collapse of adjacent Building WTC7, a massive 47-storey steel-framed skyscraper.
The official conclusion that all 82 support columns failed simultaneously from fire alone has for years raised serious questions about the official account.
The 9/11 Consensus Panel now offers four evidence-based Points about the alleged phone calls from the 9/11 flights.
The famous "let's roll" drama of the passenger revolt on UA 93 was relayed by passenger Todd Beamer's 13-minute unrecorded seat-back call to GTE telephone supervisor Lisa Jefferson, who reported Beamer as strangely tranquil, declining to speak to his wife. Eerily, Beamer's line remained open for 15 minutes after the crash.
Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer's cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.
Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.
Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.
During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) "unconnected" call from Barbara Olson, lasting "0 seconds."
In another twist, two other women reported that Caller-ID showed their husband's cell numbers on their answering machines, which while lasting several minutes, had been made from elevations of 25,000 and 35,000 feet.
Finally, although the FBI conducted a massive investigation into the calls, none of the telephone billing, nor any of the cell phone location data stored in standard phone company records has been publicly released.
The 9/11 Consensus Panel has developed 32 Points of evidence.
SOURCE The 9/11 Consensus Panel
/Web site: http://www.consensus911.org


The Wall Street Journal news department was not involved in the creation of this content.

http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-2013...09978.html

[QUOTE]Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.
Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.
During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) "unconnected" call from Barbara Olson, lasting "0 seconds."[/QUOTE]

Must be the same FBI guys running the Boston Bombing psyop - er, sorry, investigation.

I recall that Ted Olsen changed his story several times (to fit his new script no doubt).

So NO calls from Barbara. Imagine that, Ted just lied. I am so shocked.

Dawn

Dawn Meredith Wrote:I recall that Ted Olsen changed his story several times (to fit his new script no doubt).

So NO calls from Barbara. Imagine that, Ted just lied. I am so shocked.

Dawn

LOL :rofl:

Malcolm Pryce Wrote:Surely the question here has to be, Why now? The anomalies in the phone calls were well documented and exposed by the 9/11 Truth community years ago, though ignored by the mainstream media. What makes the WSJ run a story about it now, and without the usual oligatory mockery? Interestingly, both Emirates and Virgin proudly announced in 2012 technology that finally enables cell phone calls to be made at 20,000 feet. Something that had never been possible before, apart, of course, from one day in Septmeber, 2011….

Note the Murdochian disclaimer:

The Wall Street Journal news department was not involved in the creation of this content.

To which I can only hoot :rofl: :gossip: :rofl:

Dawn Meredith Wrote:I recall that Ted Olsen changed his story several times (to fit his new script no doubt).

So NO calls from Barbara. Imagine that, Ted just lied. I am so shocked.

Dawn

On the 15th anniversary I found myself thinking a LOT about all the lies of Ted Olsen. One thought occurred to me yesterday....perhaps his lies were on purpose. Meaning perhaps he was threatened to lie and so changed his story a few times as to alert those who care that he had lied. Just a thought. I mean this guy is a serious trial lawyer with an impressive record. His wife's murder would be a most memorable event, and you would THINK he would remember those events correctly. Or maybe Lady Booth really IS Barbara. Twilight Zone material for sure.

Dawn

[quote=David Guyatt][QUOTE]Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.
Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.
During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) "unconnected" call from Barbara Olson, lasting "0 seconds."[/QUOTE]

Must be the same FBI guys running the Boston Bombing psyop - er, sorry, investigation.[/QUOTE]

One has to talk quickly and through a wormhole in space-time in order to hold a conversation in a 'call' that never connected 'only lasting for zero seconds'.

This 'poetic' wording by the FBI should be read as not only did Mr. Olson lie, but the FBI originally did as well, along with the whole PR team pushing the Big Lies of 911.