Tony Szamboti Wrote:You point is a crock. The dampered blasts were audible to people "in the building", in case you forgot where they were when they heard them.
Sure. The same buildings that then fell and killed the people in them. If you look at the witness at 2:30 minutes he clearly describes hearing those booms from outside the building. Sorry Tony but your answers are obvious as the cheap excuses they are. They greatly conflict with even your own evidence and don't answer the point that was being made. You should have known this answer wouldn't have worked because you can't have dampened blasts and prominent dust jets in the same place. You seem impervious to this. Now, since your excuses don't work, we're back to the original question you haven't answered. How could Burkett's mic not pick this up?
Tony Szamboti Wrote:You are trying to say it couldn't have been a controlled demolition without full blown C-4 type sounds and that is absolutely untrue. There are numerous ways to keep the sound level down at the beginning of the collapse and that is one reason thermitic substances would have been used, and interestingly these type of substances were found in the dust.
Mush. You aren't answering how your witnesses could have heard those impressive booms they speak of in your video yet Burkett's microphone didn't? Sorry but science requires that any blast capable of making your massive dust jets shown in your video would have to be accompanied by an explosive sound. The same sound your witnesses speak of.
You didn't answer why Chandler chose explosives and you chose ill-defined thermitic devices? There's a conflict there your team needs to account for if you're going to make videos.
Tony Szamboti Wrote:Your argument is akin to somebody seeing a stealth aircraft doing everything an aircraft does and saying they saw it, but you tell them it couldn't have been an aircraft because it wasn't picked up on your radar. All I ever say about the initiation is that it was caused by some form of demolition devices. That is what the response of the building shows, just like the stealth aircraft can be visually seen to behave like an aircraft without much of a radar signature. Additionally, once the collapse starts the roar of it would mask explosive sounds just like chaff masks the radar signature of non-stealth aircraft.
What is really being done here is you are saying a large fiery blast is seen but somehow it didn't make any noise. Show me an explosive blast that doesn't make any noise.
Your video is just the shocked victims telling what they heard. Meanwhile you haven't explained why they give many different versions of alleged demolition blasts? You haven't explained why the spooks would need isolated blasts if they already had synchronized wave charges in place that would do the job by themselves?
The roar didn't mask the booms your video witnesses heard (how many times do I have to repeat that?).
Your initiation device claim is too general. You also fail to explain why Chandler would claim the obvious bogus explosives initiation cause that isn't backed-up by the observations and conflicts with the huge explosions claimed to be coursing down the building. Somehow Chandler's explosions at the top don't make any dust jets and you've failed to explain that.
Tony Szamboti Wrote:As shown here, your argument concerning explosive noise is seriously flawed as it does not consider efforts which could be made to reduce noise levels at the beginning of the collapse and that they would be masked during the collapse.
You don't seem to grasp the science involved with those dust jets. If they originated from explosives their size and strength seen in the video would require an accompanying boom. The noise caused by explosives is from the violent shockwave caused by the rapidly expanding gas of the explosion. According to your theory, your video dust jets must, by science, have been caused by such an event because of their easily-seen properties. You can't have silent blasts as you suggest unless they are pneumatic but even those would create a noise.
You've got a problem because if your demolition synchronized wave charges Chandler shows were muted by the roar then you have to explain what the "boom, boom, boom, boom, boom" the people in your video heard was? At the very least you've misrepresented what those people were hearing in your video. You continue to try to have it both ways and, frankly, don't seem to notice in your responses:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNLa93Q_...r_embedded
.