Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: New book on the Dulles brothers
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
A review of The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War by Stephen Kinzer. It looks pretty good, though it doesn't seem to discuss their involvement with companies that had ties to the Nazis.

"Their influence lingers on in the massive national security state that they helped construct during the early years of the Cold War and that continues to expand and search relentlessly for fresh enemies to justify its own existence."

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazin...p?page=all
I ordered my copy last May. I hope that the Sullivan & Cromwell Nazi connection is included.
Morris Berman:

http://morrisberman.blogspot.com/2013/12...html#links

One of the more famous quotes made by Nelson Mandela during his lifetime has been curiously omitted by the mainstream American media in the gushing obituaries that have recently appeared. It goes like this: "If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don't care for human beings." I had occasion to remember this remark upon recently reading a review of Stephen Kinzer's book The Brothers, recently published in the NYTBR (issue of November 10). Kinzer used to work for the NYT, then switched over to The Guardian, and in between wrote two important books on American interventionism: All the Shah's Men and Overthrowboth of them powerful indictments of U.S. foreign policy. He now returns to the scene with a biography of the Dulles brothers, John Foster and Allen. The opening paragraph of the Times review is worth quoting in full:

"Anyone wanting to know why the United States is hated across much of the world need look no farther than this book. The Brothers is a riveting chronicle of government-sanctioned murder, casual elimination of inconvenient' regimes, relentless prioritization of American corporate interests and cynical arrogance on the part of two men who were once among the most powerful in the world."

Both brothers, Kinzer tells us, were law partners in the New York firm of Sullivan & Cromwell, a firm that, in the 1930s, worked for I.G. Farben, the chemicals conglomerate that eventually manufactured Zyklon B (the gas used to murder the Jews). Allen Dulles, at least, finally began to have qualms about doing business in Nazi Germany, and pushed through the closure of the S&C office there, over John Foster's objections. The latter, as Secretary of State under Eisenhower, worked with his brother (by now head of the CIA) to destroy Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran, Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala, and Patrice Lumumba in the Congo, among others. The two of them pursued a Manichaean world view that was endemic to American ideology and government, which included the notion that threats to corporate interests were identical to support for communism. As John Foster once explained it: "For us there are two kinds of people in the world. There are those who are Christians and support free enterprise, and there are the others." It was not for nothing that President Johnson, much to his credit, privately complained that the CIA had been running "a goddamn Murder Inc. in the Caribbean," the beneficiaries of which were American corporate interests.

The destructiveness of the Dulles brothers in foreign policy was mirrored by what went on in their personal lives. They were distant, uncomfortable fathers, not wanting their children to "intrude" on their parents' world, and they refused to attend the wedding of their sister, Eleanor, when she married a Jew. At home and abroad, the two of them were truly awful human beings. But the most trenchant comment made by Kinzer reflects an argument I have repeatedly made, namely the relationship between the macrocosm and the microcosm. "They are us. We are them," says Kinzer, and this is the God-awful truth: that it is a rotten culture that produces rotten representatives. Americans benefited, materially speaking, from the corporate profits generated by the violence fostered by the CIA and the State Department, and didn't say boo. They mindlessly got on the anti-Communist bandwagon, never questioning what we were doing around the world in the name of it. Their focus was on the tail fins of their new cars, and the new, exciting world of refrigerators and frozen foods, not on the torture regime we installed in Iran, or the genocide we made possible in Guatemala. By the latest count, 86% of them can't locate Iran on a world map, and it's a good bet that less than 0.5% can say who John Foster Dulles even was. When Mandela says that "they don't care for human beings," we have to remember that the "they" is not just the U.S. government; it also consists of millions of individual Americans whose idea of life is little more than "what's in it for me?"the national mantra, when you get right down to it. The protesters who marched in the streets against our involvement in Vietnam, after all, amounted to only a tiny fraction of the overall American population, and it's not clear that things have changed all that much: 62% of Americans are in favor of the predator drone strikes in the Middle East that murder civilians on a weekly basis. You don't get the Dulleses rising to the top without Mr. John Q. Public, and he is as appalling as they. Like the Dulleses, he typically believes in a Christian world of free enterprise vs. the evil others who do not, "thinks" in terms of Manichaean slogans, and is not terribly concerned about anyone outside his immediate familyif that. America didn't get to be what it is by accident; this much should be clear.

"They are us. We are them."
Definitely keen on getting this.

I am surprised by how few books there are on the Dulles family. A very interesting family Dulles parents were up to their eyeballs in the spy business. I am editing this comment, Kinzer has an interesting take... he believes that Dulles was suffering from the onset of Alzheimer's for the Bay of Pigs apparently. I didn't realize he was the boner who came up with the idea he had an early onset of Alzheimer's. This is the problem as I see it basically the idea Dulles was to incompetent to do anything. Kinzer, doesn't seem smart enough to figure out that Dulles with his affliction effectively ran the Warren Commission. I would still like to read this book it might have some goo stuff. Nonetheless, the Alzheimers call is extremely dubious.
We have filmed interviews with Dulles from the mid-60s (check out "The Science of Spying" documentary from 1965 on YouTube) and he certainly doesn't appear to be suffering from Alzheimers.
Yes if you look at any footage of him before and after the Kennedy hit he was extremely lucid.