Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: The permanent government loses patience with the transient in the White House
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
The revolt of the CFR:Out with the brothers and sisters, in with the WASPs and dual nationals...

Washington is in Revolt Against Obama

by Thierry Meyssan
Translation by Roger Lagassé

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) | 26 JANUARY 2015

http://www.voltairenet.org/article186543.html

The crisis gripping the US state apparatus is directly threatening the survival of the Empire. This is no longer merely the opinion of Thierry Meyssan, but the subject that is shaking the ruling class in Washington to the point that the honorary president of the Council on Foreign Relations is demanding the resignation of the chief advisers of President Obama and the appointment of a new team. This clash has nothing to do with a typical opposition of Democrats and Republicans, nor even with that of the doves / hawks. What is at stake is leadership in the United States and NATO.

Quote:For several months now, I've been noting that there is no foreign policy in Washington, but two factions that oppose each other in all things and separately conduct contradictory and inconsistent policies. [1]

The climax of this situation has been reached in Syria, where the White House first organized the moult of Daesh and sent it to ethnically cleanse Iraq, then fought it even though the CIA continues to support it. This inconsistency has gradually spread to the Allies. Thus, France joined the anti-Daesh coalition while some of its legionaries are part of the Daesh cadre [2].

When the Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, requested written clarification, he not only received no answer, but he was fired. [3]

The disorder soon spread to NATO, an alliance created to fight the USSR and maintained against Russia, when Turkish President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan signed gigantic economic agreements with Vladimir Putin. [4]

Coming out of his silence, the honorary chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations [5], Leslie H. Gelb, sounded the alarm. [6] He said that "the Obama team lacked basic instincts and judgment to lead the national security policy in the next two years." And he continued, on behalf of the US ruling class as a whole: "President Obama needs to replace his team with strong personalities and experienced strategists. He should also place new people as Senior Advisors to the Secretaries of Defense and State. And he must finally implement regular consultations with Bob Corker, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, and John McCain [7], the chairman of the Armed Services Committee. »

Never, since its creation in 1921, has the Council on Foreign Relations taken such a position. This is because the divisions within the state apparatus are leading the United States directly to doom.

Listing the main advisers, which, according to him, must leave, Mr. Gelb cites four people very close intellectually and emotionally to the President: Susan Rice (National Security Advisor), Dennis McDonough (Chief of Staff of the White House), Benjamin Rhodes (Communications) and Valerie Jarrett (Foreign Policy Advisor). The ruling class in Washington accuses them of never submitting original proposals to the president, much less contradicting him, but always humouring him in his prejudices.

The only personality to find favor in the eyes of the Council on Foreign Relations, Anthony Blinken, new No. 2 at the State Department, is a "liberal hawk".

The Council on Foreign Relations being a bipartisan body, Mr. Gelb proposes that President Obama surround himself by four Democrats and four Republicans corresponding to the profile he described. First the Democrats: Thomas Pickering (former ambassador to the United Nations), Winston Lord (former assistant to Henry Kissinger), Frank Wisner (unofficially one of the bosses of the CIA and incidentally Nicolas Sarkozy's stepfather) and Michèle Flournoy (the President of the Center for a New American Security) [8]. Then, Republicans Robert Zoellick (former head of the World Bank) [9], Richard Armitage (former assistant to Colin Powell) [10], Robert Kimmitt (probable next boss of the World Bank), and Richard Burt (former negotiator on the reduction of nuclear weapons).

For Secretary of Defense, Mr. Gelb offers Rabbi Dov Zakheim to manage budget cuts [11], Admiral Mike Mullen (former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) and General Jack Keane (former Chief of Staff of the Army).

Finally, Mr. Gelb proposes that the national security strategy be developed in consultation with the four "wise men": Henry Kissinger [12] Brent Scowcroft, Zbigniew Brzezinski, [13] and James Baker. [14]

Looking more closely at this list, we understand that the Council on Foreign Relations did not want to decide between the two opposing groups within the Obama administration, but it intends to restore order in the system from above. In this regard, it is not irrelevant in a country thus far led by WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) that two counsellors whose dismissals are required are black women, while fourteen of the fifteen incoming names are white males, either Protestant or Ashkenazi. The political housekeeping is also therefore an ethnic and religious takeover.

[1] For instance : "Does Obama still have a military policy?", by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 1 December 2014.

[2] "French « ex-military » operatives with Daesh jihadists", Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 24 January 2015.

[3] "Who is the Pentagon fighting against in Syria?", Voltaire Network, 4 November 2014.

[4] "How Vladimir Putin Upset NATO's Strategy", by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 13 December 2014.

[5] « Comment le Conseil des relations étrangères détermine la diplomatie US », Réseau Voltaire, 25 juin 2004.

[6] « This Is Obama's Last Foreign Policy Chance », Leslie Gelb, The Daily Beast, January 14, 2015.

[7] "John McCain, Conductor of the "Arab Spring" and the Caliph", by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Network, 18 August 2014.

[8] "CNAS, the democratic version of conquest imperialism", by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Al-Watan (Syria), Voltaire Network, 6 January 2015.

[9] « Robert B. Zoellick, maître d'œuvre de la globalisation », Réseau Voltaire, 10 mars 2005.

[10] « Richard Armitage, le baroudeur qui rêvait d'être diplomate », Réseau Voltaire, 8 octobre 2004.

[11] « Dov Zakheim, la caution du Pentagone », par Paul Labarique, Réseau Voltaire, 9 septembre 2004.

[12] « Le retour d'Henry Kissinger », par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 28 novembre 2002.

[13] "The outrageous strategy to destroy Russia", by Arthur Lepic, Voltaire Network, 22 October 2004.

[14] « James A. Baker III, un ami fidèle », Réseau Voltaire, 16 décembre 2003.
Excellent article and the future doesn't look good if they get their way.
Ever the skeptic, I wonder how much this revolt is in fact a "revolt," prescripted and planned. This kinda of reminds me of the end of the Clinton administration when the cry went out for the "adults" who knew what they were doing to get back in the drivers seat.
Lauren Johnson Wrote:This kinda of reminds me of the end of the Clinton administration...

As the blessed Monica once remarked. I suspect we will all have to suck it and see.
Isn't Susan Rice a member of the CFR? And who does Valerie Jarrett actually work for?
It's great to see such a conflict taking place.

Blimey, bring back Richard Armitage! The mind boggles. Ditto Winston Lord and Frank Wisner.

And yes, of course Obama should "implement regular consultation with John McCain."

Not.

And yes, Obama really should surround himself with people utterly dedicated to the big business and the war party - and who have absolutely no allegiance to him, but who will work behind his back undermining anything he tries to do that conflicts with their deeper agenda. Of course he should.

Isn't this in effect, a battle between common sense and the "war party"? Isn't this also part of the story why Netanyahu snubbed Obama and went to Washington breaching protocol?

This rather sounds to me that the CFR and big business aren't getting their complete and utter way when it comes to foreign policy, as the usually do (and expect), and don't like it. If this is the case, then I do like it.
Dov Zakheim. Well, why not? :Confusedhock::