Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: Two new articles - Hopsicker and Hicks on Jeb Bush and the 9/11 cover-up
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Don't have time to format and quote the whole things but others (Peter?) are more than welcome if they want to do so in this thread. Both the articles here complement each other.

Sander Hicks on Confronting Jeb Bush about his role in the 9/11 cover-up

http://slingshottothe.blogspot.com.au/20...d.html?m=1

Daniel Hopsicker on Jeb Bush's 9/11 problem

http://www.madcowprod.com/2015/09/04/jeb...1-problem/

Hicks has a lengthy chapter expanding on Hopsicker's work in his valuable book SLINGSHOT TO THE JUGGERNAUT.
Anthony Thorne Wrote:Don't have time to format and quote the whole things but others (Peter?) are more than welcome if they want to do so in this thread. Both the articles here complement each other.

Sander Hicks on Confronting Jeb Bush about his role in the 9/11 cover-up

http://slingshottothe.blogspot.com.au/20...d.html?m=1

Daniel Hopsicker on Jeb Bush's 9/11 problem

http://www.madcowprod.com/2015/09/04/jeb...1-problem/

Hicks has a lengthy chapter expanding on Hopsicker's work in his valuable book SLINGSHOT TO THE JUGGERNAUT.

Good stuff! Interesting the files from Huffman Aviation went to CIA, according to Hopsicker's informants. Glad Hopsicker is back in the 'saddle' after his illness. The whole Bush family and a lot of their friends and business partners had some involvement before/during/after in 911 - however, I don't believe Bush-the-W was in any way a 'mastermind' of that operation...if 'mastermind' can even be associated with that mental and ethical midget. He likely wasn't even in the 'loop' until the cover-up, IMHO.

Would be hard to format the first article for this forum, as the very interesting video questions/responses to/from Jeb Bush about his flying with the documents to D.C. are posted on facebook. I don't believe putting that into our website will work...but I'm sure there is a work-around. I just don't know it. Have a look at his uncomfortable body language!

Peter Lemkin Wrote:
Anthony Thorne Wrote:Don't have time to format and quote the whole things but others (Peter?) are more than welcome if they want to do so in this thread. Both the articles here complement each other.

Sander Hicks on Confronting Jeb Bush about his role in the 9/11 cover-up

http://slingshottothe.blogspot.com.au/20...d.html?m=1

Daniel Hopsicker on Jeb Bush's 9/11 problem

http://www.madcowprod.com/2015/09/04/jeb...1-problem/

Hicks has a lengthy chapter expanding on Hopsicker's work in his valuable book SLINGSHOT TO THE JUGGERNAUT.

Good stuff! Interesting the files from Huffman Aviation went to CIA, according to Hopsicker's informants. Glad Hopsicker is back in the 'saddle' after his illness. The whole Bush family and a lot of their friends and business partners had some involvement before/during/after in 911 - however, I don't believe Bush-the-W was in any way a 'mastermind' of that operation...if 'mastermind' can even be associated with that mental and ethical midget. He likely wasn't even in the 'loop' until the cover-up, IMHO.

Would be hard to format the first article for this forum, as the very interesting video questions/responses to/from Jeb Bush about his flying with the documents to D.C. are posted on facebook. I don't believe putting that into our website will work...but I'm sure there is a work-around. I just don't know it. Have a look at his uncomfortable body language!


It's more than interesting that Bush's reply wasn't a denial:

Quote:Bush began taking another question, then stopped. His voice rising slightly to convey indignation, he said, "I was in the Emergency Operations Center trying to make sure the state of Florida was safe… trying to work with local officials to figure out how to make sure another attack wouldn't hit and devastate our economy…That's what I did."

It was a deflection.
David Guyatt Wrote:
Peter Lemkin Wrote:
Anthony Thorne Wrote:Don't have time to format and quote the whole things but others (Peter?) are more than welcome if they want to do so in this thread. Both the articles here complement each other.

Sander Hicks on Confronting Jeb Bush about his role in the 9/11 cover-up

http://slingshottothe.blogspot.com.au/20...d.html?m=1

Daniel Hopsicker on Jeb Bush's 9/11 problem

http://www.madcowprod.com/2015/09/04/jeb...1-problem/

Hicks has a lengthy chapter expanding on Hopsicker's work in his valuable book SLINGSHOT TO THE JUGGERNAUT.

Good stuff! Interesting the files from Huffman Aviation went to CIA, according to Hopsicker's informants. Glad Hopsicker is back in the 'saddle' after his illness. The whole Bush family and a lot of their friends and business partners had some involvement before/during/after in 911 - however, I don't believe Bush-the-W was in any way a 'mastermind' of that operation...if 'mastermind' can even be associated with that mental and ethical midget. He likely wasn't even in the 'loop' until the cover-up, IMHO.

Would be hard to format the first article for this forum, as the very interesting video questions/responses to/from Jeb Bush about his flying with the documents to D.C. are posted on facebook. I don't believe putting that into our website will work...but I'm sure there is a work-around. I just don't know it. Have a look at his uncomfortable body language!


It's more than interesting that Bush's reply wasn't a denial:

Quote:Bush began taking another question, then stopped. His voice rising slightly to convey indignation, he said, "I was in the Emergency Operations Center trying to make sure the state of Florida was safe… trying to work with local officials to figure out how to make sure another attack wouldn't hit and devastate our economy…That's what I did."


It was a deflection.

Well, let's give Jeb his due, when it is due...he didn't deny he was on the flight and involved in getting the Huffman Aviation documents to the CIA or wherever in D.C. they disappeared - never to be seen/heard again [and CERTAINLY not part of the 911 Omission Report!]; however, he did deflect [almost genuflect] the question....gee, wonder why?!::bowtie::
While I don't claim to know, I would make the educated guess that he was asked to do this because it was felt he could keep his mouth shut about it and as Governor would not be asked too many questions as to his authority to do so. It is interesting, however, that this flight school chosen for 'training' at least two of the 'pilots' [ahem] for the events [or wargame perhaps] was situated [chosen] in a state [the only state] that had a Bush as Governor. Of course, that could just be COINCIDENCE, like everything else about 911 and all false-flag operations.:Ninja:
Peter Lemkin Wrote:The whole Bush family and a lot of their friends and business partners had some involvement before/during/after in 911 - however, I don't believe Bush-the-W was in any way a 'mastermind' of that operation...if 'mastermind' can even be associated with that mental and ethical midget. He likely wasn't even in the 'loop' until the cover-up, IMHO.

I agree; nobody would trust Dubya to be in the loop until after the fact. And Jeb also doesn't appear to be well put together. He's often as nervous as a cat in a room full of rocking chairs. He doesn't seem to want to be President very badly. He acts more like he's expecting to be appointed the next CEO so his family's network can get back into power.
Weirdly, I heard Daniel Hopsicker being interviewed on Ed Opperman's show and he said words to the effect that he believed the official story of 9/11. Very strange stuff indeed given the work he has done.
R.K. Locke Wrote:Weirdly, I heard Daniel Hopsicker being interviewed on Ed Opperman's show and he said words to the effect that he believed the official story of 9/11. Very strange stuff indeed given the work he has done.

Very weird.
Lauren Johnson Wrote:
R.K. Locke Wrote:Weirdly, I heard Daniel Hopsicker being interviewed on Ed Opperman's show and he said words to the effect that he believed the official story of 9/11. Very strange stuff indeed given the work he has done.

Very weird.


From about 17:15 here:

RKL: So, is he applying these standards equally? It seems to me that suddenly, he develops the standards right out of All The President's Men. You print the story when you get independent verification, etc.

But what happens when competent, independent experts all say the buildings came down via controlled demolition, as is the case? That's not a reliable source? What does he need? Two independent persons both who say they were ordered to load up the buildings on the weekends during power outages? Guess so. So until that happens, you have to say that the impossible happened because it can't be disproved?
Hopsicker has been LIHOP for a while, and I doubt he's ever looked too closely at the building evidence. His work remains very valuable however, and I honestly think the movement would benefit if a few more activists would put down their petitions and footage of Building 7 and dug into some of the leads that Hopsicker uncovered in Florida.

Jeb airlifted the documents from Huffman on September 12th. What was the big hurry? The answer seems obvious, but itself poses a question that I'm not sure many have considered. If Jeb moved to courier those documents out of there on September 12th, was he unaware who the hijackers were until FBI 'leads' (and obviously those had been prepped to spring on the public beforehand) pointed to that same group of people on 9/11?

Hopsicker's work points towards links between the 'hijackers' and the drug trade. Was that group chosen to be the patsies simply because the various Iran-Contra and CIA figures who were protecting the drug trade would move heaven and earth to prevent any cracks developing in the official story, to avoid anyone looking deeper into who those people were, and what they were linked to? Any federal officials linked with the previous cover-ups of the drug trade would be very compliant in preventing any further investigation into that same milieu. I recall Lee Oswald was a useful patsy as his various CIA and FBI links were enough to encourage a complicated cover-up from day one. The 9/11 'hijackers' - before they participated in what was probably, to some of them, a much anticipated 'drill' with a big payday promised at the end of it - might have served a similar purpose.
Pages: 1 2