I kept getting diverted by the deadpan face of the interviewer, who despite having absolutely no facial muscles could, amazingly, open & close his mouth and utter utterly monotone comprehensible sentences.
Otherwise a must watch:
Yeah, this is a good vid. The Professor hedges a bit too much for my liking but I suppose a modicum of caution is understandable in the circumstances.
R.K. Locke Wrote:Yeah, this is a good vid. The Professor hedges a bit too much for my liking but I suppose a modicum of caution is understandable in the circumstances.
Yes I agree but he always is clear why: Academic suicide or worse, murder. Another rabbit hole that was never explored, but someone people became very rich.
There are entire good books on the topic of insider trading on 911 via put options...but they too get ignored even by the 911 truth movement, generally and certainly, certainly by the MSM and society generally [conspiracy tosh!].
That interviewer should think about a second career as a ventriloquist, if he doesn't already do that on the side....but to give him credit where credit is due, he asked the right questions, even if his lips hardly moved and nothing else on his face did.
The destruction of the supposed investigations of the put option data is in itself suspicious....a cover up of a cover up and hiding the names of some of those who had advance knowledge and decided to profit from death and destruction. Many others were to profit [and are profiting still] on the wars and fear long afterward.............
While I think the existence of the insider trading deals are an important clue, I doubt that the insider trades were "authorized" by anyone who "officially" had advance notice. Since the trades themselves were for (merely) millions in profits, it seems unlikely that any organization, or group of conspirators, would risk what would inevitably be nearly fatal exposure, for so puny a return.
I'm guessing that whoever placed these puts and calls did so without the knowledge or approval of any others "in the know". And, they probably have since disappeared or died. So, if we were hunting for a suspect, I'd look for someone-highly-placed 's friend or relative who died shortly after coming into some quick cash.
Drew Phipps Wrote:While I think the existence of the insider trading deals are an important clue, I doubt that the insider trades were "authorized" by anyone who "officially" had advance notice. Since the trades themselves were for (merely) millions in profits, it seems unlikely that any organization, or group of conspirators, would risk what would inevitably be nearly fatal exposure, for so puny a return.
I'm guessing that whoever placed these puts and calls did so without the knowledge or approval of any others "in the know". And, they probably have since disappeared or died. So, if we were hunting for a suspect, I'd look for someone-highly-placed 's friend or relative who died shortly after coming into some quick cash.
https://digwithin.net/2015/05/17/top-secret/
https://digwithin.net/2012/02/24/kuwam-a...directors/
R.K. Locke Wrote:Drew Phipps Wrote:While I think the existence of the insider trading deals are an important clue, I doubt that the insider trades were "authorized" by anyone who "officially" had advance notice. Since the trades themselves were for (merely) millions in profits, it seems unlikely that any organization, or group of conspirators, would risk what would inevitably be nearly fatal exposure, for so puny a return.
I'm guessing that whoever placed these puts and calls did so without the knowledge or approval of any others "in the know". And, they probably have since disappeared or died. So, if we were hunting for a suspect, I'd look for someone-highly-placed 's friend or relative who died shortly after coming into some quick cash.
https://digwithin.net/2015/05/17/top-secret/
https://digwithin.net/2012/02/24/kuwam-a...directors/
Those two articles by Kevin Ryan [as well as similar research in his books] are, IMHO, the best on the subject of those from WTC's security who were strangely 'connected' to the spook world and those who could profit from a permanent war. Great stuff and never covered by the MSM. They won't touch it with a 110 story tower or two [and one 47 story one].