Deep Politics Forum

Pepe Escobar has just published - without comment - 3 previously unseen photos of the damage to the Pentagon on 9/11

Dang

Dave, #2 doesn't look like the Pentagon to me...not even close.....I think you'll want to take that one down.
The last one is the most interesting....this is the ORIGINAL HOLE - IMPOSSIBLE to fit a full sized aircraft in [even if the wings and tail had magically been removed - six people shoulder to shoulder would barely fit. Note too that the walls are white-glove clean except for a small area above the hole [when depleted uranium hits something hard it starts to burn at a very high heat]. What hit the Pentagon to the best of my research was a DU-tipped bunker-buster missile, probably a stolen Russian one...just in case - not to find any US made parts. The collapse you see in the second photo was done by pre-planted explosives and occurred about an hour or more after the bunker buster hit. Same scenario as WTC, but smaller on the explosives. The first photo is new to me, but so far I can't see anything very remarkable. It was taken when the real fires were out and after the explosives went off, making for a larger whole [thus slightly more 'believable' for a giant aircraft - though still not large enough. After there were new set fires again, but paltry. Jack White's research on all this still stands tall and correct. Even the inaction of the firemen. The whole thing was a very phony stage set for the endless War of Terror 'play' we now live with every day. Notice in the first photo how many neatly set up tents and such are on the lawn....as if they were prepared for this [some were!]. ::

These are some of the 24 photos just released by the FBI on the Pentagon on 911.
https://vault.fbi.gov/9-11-attacks-inves...ion-images



How the hell do you explain a plane going into this hole which is MUCH smaller than the body, let alone the wings, which have the hardest and heaviest objects of all - the engines. Where are the engines? Answer: there were none and no plane, no wings - only a missile. This hole is less than 16ft in diameter. The sign on the wall is a 'no parking' sign for size. Relevant dimensions of Boeing 757-200 (Flugzeugtriebwerke 2003)wingspan: 38.1 m (125′)
inter-engine span: center-to-centre: 16.3 m (49′ 11″) (derived)
outside span: 18.5 m (60′ 8″) (derived)
max. diameter of fuselage: 3.6 m (12′ 4″)

:hock::

Peter, in the pictures you link to, I notice everyone is wearing NIOSH respirators with organic and heavy metal filters on them. Rescuers at ground zero were no allowed to were these for PR purposes. "These fumes are safe to breath."

Lauren Johnson Wrote:Peter, in the pictures you link to, I notice everyone is wearing NIOSH respirators with organic and heavy metal filters on them. Rescuers at ground zero were no allowed to were these for PR purposes. "These fumes are safe to breath."

A few knew that due to the use of the Depleted Uranium missile [not a plane] that hit the Pentagon, there was radioactive dust everywhere. Notice a lot of the people are wearing radiation booties over their shoes too. Some are wearing full-body hazmat suits that stop radioactive dust from getting on the body and clothes underneath. ::

Peter Lemkin Wrote:

Lauren Johnson Wrote:Peter, in the pictures you link to, I notice everyone is wearing NIOSH respirators with organic and heavy metal filters on them. Rescuers at ground zero were no allowed to were these for PR purposes. "These fumes are safe to breath."

A few knew that due to the use of the Depleted Uranium missile [not a plane] that hit the Pentagon, there was radioactive dust everywhere. Notice a lot of the people are wearing radiation booties over their shoes too. Some are wearing full-body hazmat suits that stop radioactive dust from getting on the body and clothes underneath. ::

I've never heard the DU connection before. Wow. :hock::

Lauren Johnson Wrote:

Peter Lemkin Wrote:

Lauren Johnson Wrote:Peter, in the pictures you link to, I notice everyone is wearing NIOSH respirators with organic and heavy metal filters on them. Rescuers at ground zero were no allowed to were these for PR purposes. "These fumes are safe to breath."

A few knew that due to the use of the Depleted Uranium missile [not a plane] that hit the Pentagon, there was radioactive dust everywhere. Notice a lot of the people are wearing radiation booties over their shoes too. Some are wearing full-body hazmat suits that stop radioactive dust from getting on the body and clothes underneath. ::

I've never heard the DU connection before. Wow. :hock::

Just outsized DU 'ammo' = DU tipped missiles known as bunker-buster missiles - they go through concrete and steel like a hot knife through soft butter. It had to be - even a normal missile wouldn't do this kind of damage...i.e. too little. Remember too it went through three sections of the Pentagon = six reinforced concrete walls and about 20+ steel beams - and the hole on the inside is like the one on the outside, but a bit smaller. Aluminum aircraft can't do that!!! DU missiles can!!! Word has it it was a Russian DU missile [each side has some of the others for false-flag ops and reverse engineering].

Thanks for the heads up on picture 2, Pete.

I'm going to leave it in situ for the time being.

Pepe posted these as a set of three and doubtless he will, in good time, explain. Maybe? He said in his Facebook post that these are "previously unseen FBI pics of 9/11 in the Pentagon."

He does have good sources. Some very good ones too.

https://www.facebook.com/pepe.escobar.77377

Pete, I remember seeing a diagram overlay years ago, of the aircraft type that alleged hit the Pentagon lined up against the hole it supposedly made. It was obvious that aircraft didn't go through that hole, even back then.

This new picture provides a far better definition of how small the hole actually was, and the precision of the circle/hole just cannot have been made by a Commercial airliner.

That for me is the smoking gun.

I wonder why now, of all times, the FBI released these pictures? Any ideas?