Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: Anatomy of the Second Floor Lunchroom Encounter
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Harold Norman, 0ne of the three TSBD employees who viewedthe presidential parade from the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor…

(Oralhistory interview performed for the Sixth Floor Museum, 7-31-91) (Whenasked if he ever talked to Oswald) "No, no more than that particularmorning. James Jarman and myself we were down here on the first floor and wewere filling orders and we kept going back and forth to the window ya knowwaiting for the motorcade to come through, cause we had planned we was gonna goup on the fifth floor and watch it, and he asked us what was everybody waitingon, looking at you know and we just told him you know we just trying to wait'til the president come through. Prior to that that's all he said and didn'tsay anything else. Matter of fact I didn't see him no more that day you knowuntil the thing went by."


Interesting that the individual framed for firing at the presidentthat afternoon had no idea that his target was even coming by,according to his two coworkers above.


And then there's this…Did Harold Norman purposely slip in avital clue about the real whereabouts of the wrongfully accused?, quote, "Prior to that that's all he said and didn'tsay anything else. Matter of fact I didn't see him no more that day you knowuntil the thing went by."


The only "thing" that went by that afternoon was thepresidential procession…from his vantage point up on the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor, lookingdown upon the chaotic scene unfolding below him, Could Harold Norman have seen the wrongfully accused down on the front entrance steps?, before he and his two coworkers ran over to the west end of the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor. Was it a Freudian slip up, or someone trying discreetly after all these years to come clean without bringing undue attention to his intent, to avoid severe repercussions brought upon himself and/or his family members?


Lest we forget, not one individual making up this trio sawTruly and/or Baker come up the same set of stairs they descended from as they made their way downstairs, eventhis is critically importantpausing on the 4[SUP]th[/SUP] floor landing before fully completing their journey down to the first floor. That pause creates even more time for Truly and/or Baker to cross paths with this trio.

It didn't happen, soTruly's tale about running up these same set of stairs after he and Baker encounter the wrongfully accused is beyond suspect…simply an outright lie told in orderto frame an innocent party.


Given Mr. Dougherty (Jack's) testimony about taking the West elevator down stairs, and Bonnie Ray Williams' sighting of a white helmeted motorcycle officer arriving up on the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor via the same elevator, it's not frivolous to believe the reason why Dougherty or the other three employees up on the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor testified they didn't hear Truly call up for the elevators is because it simply didn't happen. Just another one ofTruly's scripted tales.


When one reconstructs the scenebased upon the testimony ofthe trio who watched the parade from the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor, and Mr.Dougherty's descent downward on the West elevator before this trio ran thelength of their southeast corner window viewing position to arrive on thosebackstairs--the same ones supposedly used by Truly & Baker--that trio should have shared within their testimonies the same experience the wrongfully accused is said to have experienced (Does this fellow work here?...gun stuck in their respective tummys, etc). Those respective experiences didn't happen because as each of them testified individually none of them encountered Truly and/or Baker on those same backstairs.


Please note what Truly himself says about the character and credibility of this trio ---
à


Mr. McCLOY. From what you know of these young men who testified before you today, are they trustworthy?
Mr. TRULY. Yes, sir; I think they are. They are good men. They have been with me, most of them, for some time. I have no reason to doubt their word….
Mr. BELIN. If we can go off the record for just a moment.

(Discussion off the record.) ::thumbsdown::

The plain simple truth doesn't need discussion off the record, modifications, retakes, etc.


Nowhere in Baker's testimony does he encounter this trio onthe same set of stairs. Nowhere inTruly's testimony does he encounter this trio on the same set of stairs. The trio simply didn't encounter this duo,because a contrived script--unlike reality, genuine truth--isn't real.


Mrs. Reid outright lied about her phantom encounter on the2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor with the wrongfully accused.

Roy Truly lied about the elevator; the phantom 2[SUP]nd[/SUP]floor encounter; his mad dash, leading the charge up the backstairs, and, Idare say IF the 56 year old had genuinely run up those strenuous set of multiple stairs, and made his way back down the same path again as the officerchecked the other floors (ßhis words), he should have been winded, sucking air into his 56 year old lungs, and sweating profusely, and in need of at least a few minutes alone in his office to recover, loosen his tie, open a couple of buttons on his shirt, etc.--instead of immediately noticing anyone missing, let alone the wrongfully accused he fingered…nary a picturenot one--that afternoon shows Truly even momentarily untidy/scruffy, disheveled in his appearance…nevertheless, a contrived script void of reality had to be followed; and, Officer Baker was simply void of the courage/valor to overcome the Or Else proposition he was thrust into after recording the truth just the day before (essentially there was no encounterw/the wrongfully accused, or he would have diligently put such an experience inhis report).

then suddenly--the next day--enters the phantom 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter in the lunchroom...Baker was made to know by parties yet unknown, Or Else propositions have a way of making people understand the full implications of what the Godfather infers/mean about making an offer you cannot refuse.


Reid. Truly. Baker. Amazing what some people will do for thirty pieces of silver.
And again...to continue...

After careful and deliberate study, strongly enhanced by the research of Richard Gilbride, I have to conclude that LeeHarveyOswald cannot be "disappeared" from the 2nd floor lunchroom at 12:31pm/12:32pm CST, nor can he be "magically appeared" on the Elm St entrance landing/steps/sidewalk at 12:30pm CST.

As the motorcade drove past the Elm St entrance at about 12:30pm, there were multiple doorway/landing/steps area occupants, that were employed at the TSBD building, and yet there is not any reliable eyewitness testimony that affirms LHO's presence at the time. And, most of said occupants very likely would have recognized their fellow TSBD building employee.

So, at 12:30pm-12:32pm, CST, LHO was where he was, and he wasn't where he wasn't. And suppositions, no matter how often repeated, cannot alter true facts.

A conclusion? Absolutely! Evidenced based? Absolutely!
[/QUOTE]
[FONT=&amp]In spite of the attempt to shift focus upon the whereabouts of the wrongfully accused, these lingering questions still remain unanswered: [/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
How did Baker really reach the 5
[SUP]th[/SUP] floor?[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
In the bogus manner spoken by a conniving, scripted liar,Or, via the West elevator?
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
Why did Baker not recognize the wrongfully accused IF he really had an encounter with him on the 2
[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor? Who puts a gun in someone's tummy and then forgets about it while writing up an official report that same afternoon?! No one does, yet the conniving script would have us believe Baker did. Riight!!!!! [/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
Why did Mrs. Reid outright lie about her encounter with the wrongfully accused?
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
How did Baker catch a glimpse of someone angled behind him over his right shoulder?, while charging hard up a stairway that bore sharply to his left? Does he have eyes in the back of his head?
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
Why didn't a single person actually up on the 5
[SUP]th[/SUP]floor hear Truly call up for an elevator? That's a small echo chamber folks,and he would have been heard even if he whispered it. No
one heard Truly because Truly lied...A-G-A-I-N.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
IF they really were on those backstairs, Why didn'tTruly & Baker encounter Mr. Williams (Bonnie Ray)? Why didn't Truly & Baker encounter Mr. Norman (Harold)? Why didn't Truly & Baker encounter Mr.Jarman (James)?
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
Repeating the conniving script of Truly & Baker--peppered with off the record modifications-- doesn't equate into "Facts"; however, answering away any of the above questions beyond a shadow of doubt would certainly help bolster their bogus, phantom encounter with the wrongfully accused. Anything less equates to the liars simply out lied themselves in their haste to FRAME an innocent party.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
They seized upon the big picture, while neglecting the all important details (most conniving liars do).
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]
Very telling that these lingering questions remain unanswered...

Reid. Truly. Baker. Amazing what some people will do for thirty pieces of silver.


[/FONT]
Considering that eyewitness testimony places LeeHarveyOswald on the 2nd floor of the TSBD Building, in the lunchroom when encountered by DPD Officer MarrionLewisBaker, who was accompanied by Building Superintendent RoySansomTruly, at or just past 12:31pm,CST,on 11/22/'63,indicates that for LHO to not have been encountered there at that time, means that he had to be somewhere else. If he was somewhere else, then where? And, is there any reliable eyewitness testimony placing him there at that specific time?
Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground [first] floor. -- Ochus V. Campbell, vice-president of the Texas School Book Depository, witnessing the wrongfully accused (OSWALD) nowhere near the 6[SUP]th[/SUP] floor, let alone the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor lunchroom.

Buttressing Mr. Campbell's sighting ---->

"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".

there ='s first floor
the way upstairs ='s any floor above the first floor.

Baker stated in his same-day affidavit, "As we reached the 3rd or 4th floor I saw a man walking away from the stairway. I called to the man & he turned around & came back toward me" (This individual by the way was 6 years older than the wrongfully accused; this individual weighed 35lbs more than the wrongfully accused; and, this individual is the only genuine encounter up on the upper floors Baker experienced on 11/22/63).

Brief Sidebar: Did Mr. Molina (Joe R), a TSBD employee of 16 years actually see the wrongfully accused out in front of the building when the presidential limousine passed by their position atop the entrance steps?

What sensitive information did this gentleman hold?, and why did the authorities immediately terrorize him & his family (including small young children)? --->
[URL="https://www.jfk-assassination.com/warren/wch/vol6/page368.php"]
https://www.jfk-assassination.com/warren...age368.php[/URL]

Was this terrorizing blitz to serve as a paralyzing-fear/harsh reminder for the entire Molina family through the years to play ball Or Else?

Now, let's return to the adventures of Truly & Baker…

Mr. DULLES - You saw Oswald later in the lineup or later
Mr. BAKER - I never did have a chance to see him in the lineup. I saw him when I went to give the affidavit, the statement that I saw him down there, of the actions of myself and Mr. Truly as we went into the building and on up what we are discussing now.
(At this point Senator Cooper entered the hearing room.)
Mr. BELIN - Officer Baker
Mr. DULLES - I didn't get clearly in mind, I am trying to check up, as to whether you saw Oswald maybe in the same costume later in the day. Did you see Oswald later in the day of November 22d?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; I did.
Mr. DULLES - Under what circumstances? Don't go into detail, I just want to tie up these two situations.
Mr. BAKER - As I was in the homicide office there writing this, giving this affidavit, I got hung in one of those little small offices back there, while the Secret Service took Mr. Oswald in there and questioned him and I couldn't get out by him while they were questioning him, and I did get to see him at that time.

and please note, Baker simply doesn't recognize the wrongfully accused as the individual he encountered up on an upper floor, let alone in a lunch room. In fact, his truthful, same day affidavit does not mention Mr. Oswald at all…

Also note, Commission member Allen Welsh Dulles doesn't want Baker to go into any specifics --->

Mr. DULLES - I didn't get clearly in mind, I am trying to check up, as to whether you saw Oswald maybe in the same costume later in the day. Did you see Oswald later in the day of November 22d?
Mr. BAKER - Yes, sir; I did.
Mr. DULLES - Under what circumstances? Don't go into detail, I just want to tie up these two situations.


"Don't go into detail", because we have exhausted our use of enough "discussions off the record"? already?

Or, fear that any forthcoming specific details would have Baker reverting back to this same day scenario --->

"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".

Deceptive-Dulles would have none of that, thus his "Don't go into details, I just want to tie up these two situations.

Now, back to Truly's lips...

Mr. BELIN. When you got to the fifth floor, as I understand it, the west elevator was not there, but when you started up from the first floor, you thought it was on the fifth floor.
Mr. TRULY. No. When I came down from the second floor---from the seventh floor with the officer, I thought I saw Jack Dougherty on the fifth floor, which he would have had plenty of time to move the elevator down and up and get some stock and come back.

Compared to this --->

Mr. BELIN. Mr. Truly, when you took the elevator to the fifth--from the fifth to the seventh floor, that east elevator did you see the west elevator at all as you passed the sixth floor, when you got to the seventh floor?
Mr. TRULY. No, sir; because I could not see the west elevator while operating the east elevator.

So, How did Truly see Mr. Dougherty then?

Is his lips moving again?

What is it Truly?

You can see through metal? when it fits your contrived script?, Or, you couldn't while operating the east elevator…enlighten us, but spare us the bs. Besides, Mr. Dougherty--per his own WC testimony was looking for you way down on the first floor.

and then there's this too --->

Mr. DULLES. Is it your view he went out the front door rather than one of the back doors?
Mr. TRULY. Yes, sir; it is. From the nature. from the direction he was walking through the office, and the front stairway, to reach the second floor--it is my view that he walked down the front stairs and just out through the crowd there, probably a minute or two before the police had everything stopped.

So, here again, Truly pushes a contrived script….IF he and the officer, quote (see bold),

Mr. BELIN. And then what happened?
Mr. TRULY. Then we left Lee Harvey Oswald immediately and continued to run up the stairways until we reached the fifth floor.
Mr. BELIN. All right.

Question: How does Truly see the direction he was walking through the office…then?

Is someone over reading a contrived script?, Or, does he have eyes in the back of his head capable of seeing through five stories of brick walls?
LR Trotter Wrote:Considering that eyewitness testimony places LeeHarveyOswald on the 2nd floor of the TSBD Building, in the lunchroom when encountered by DPD Officer MarrionLewisBaker, who was accompanied by Building Superintendent RoySansomTruly, at or just past 12:31pm,CST,on 11/22/'63,indicates that for LHO to not have been encountered there at that time, means that he had to be somewhere else. If he was somewhere else, then where? And, is there any reliable eyewitness testimony placing him there at that specific time?

As I continue to stand by my thoughts as posted, I have yet to see reliable testimony that disproves my expressed conclusion, including the timing involved.
Trulyin the following exchange-- is either flustered, confused, lying or being coached about how his hastily contrived script should read ---->

Mr. Ball.Now, about what time of day would you say is your best estimate that you told Captain Fritz of the name "Lee Oswald" and his address?
Mr. Truly.My best estimate would be a little before 1 o'clock--10 minutes.
Mr. Ball.The gun wasn't found until after 1 o'clock?
Mr. Truly.It wasn't found until after 1 o'clock?
Mr. Ball.No, it wasn't found until after 1 o'clock. I won't tell you exactly the time the gun was found, but I will say that the gun was not found until after 1 o'clock.
Mr. Truly.Well, I may be mistaken about where I learned they had found the gun. I thought it was on the sixth floor--it could have been some other place.

AF: you are certainly "mistaken" about that phantom 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter w/the wrongfully accused.

Mr. Ball.Captain Fritz said you didn't tell him that until after the gun was found and that seems to correspond with your memory too, is that correct?
Mr. Truly.It sure does, because I remember clearly that Captain Fritz was over at where the gun was found and I'm sure they must have found it or he wouldn't have been standing in that area when we came up there.

AF: Was that small detail defined within your contrived script notes, Truly?, that until the rifle was found Captain Fritz was to remain elsewhere? Forbidden to move freely into that particular position?

Mr. Ball.Now, if the gun was found after I o'clock, when was it that you discovered that Lee Oswald wasn't there?
Mr. Truly.I thought it was about 20 minutes after the shooting--the assassination, but it could have been longer.
Mr. Ball.In other words, you thought originally it might have been 10 minutes of 2 or so that you learned that?
Mr. Truly.Ten minutes to 1.
Mr. Ball.Ten minutes to 1?
Mr. Truly.It was around 1 o'clock--that period of time after I came down from the sixth floor to the first floor was rather hazy in my memory.

AF: Hazy enough to forgot the actual encounter was up on the 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] or 4[SUP]th[/SUP] floor with someone other than the wrongfully accused?

Hazy enough to forget that that individual was much older and MUCH heavier than the wrongfully accused?


Mr. Ball.You think it might have been after 1 when you first noticed he wasn't there?
Mr. Truly.I don't think so---I don't feel like at was. It could have possibly been so.
Mr. Ball.Well, if the gun was not found before 1:10, if it wasn't found before that, can you give me any estimate?
Mr. Truly.That seems to be a longer time after the assassination.
Mr. Ball.You didn't wait 20 minutes from the time you learned Lee Oswald's address until the time you told Captain Fritz, did you?
Mr. Truly.No, sir; I did stand there on the first floor waiting until Chief Lumpkin got through talking for a few minutes.
Mr. Ball.Tell me about how many minutes you think it was from the time you obtained the address of Lee Oswald until you told Captain Fritz the name and address?
Mr. Truly.I think it was immediately.
Mr. Ball.Immediately?
Mr. Truly.Immediately, after I called to the warehouse and got his name and address in Irving, I turned around and walked over and told Captain Fritz at that time.
Mr. Ball.Chief Lumpkin?
Mr. Truly.Yes; Chief Lumpkin. And I remember Chief Lumpkin talking to two or three officers and I stepped back and he went ahead and told them a few things--it could have been 2 or 3 or 4 minutes.
Mr. Ball.Not over that?
Mr. Truly.I don't believe so, and then he came to me and said, "All right, Mr. Truly, let's go up and see Captain Fritz and tell him this."
Mr. Ball.Then, if the gun wasn't found until after 1:10, you think it might have been as late as 1:05 or so before you discovered that Oswald wasn't there?
Mr. Truly.It could be--it could have been.

AF: Could be ?????

It could have been ?????

Having trouble with your contrived script ?

In need of some more reassuring "discussion off the record" ?

Pull yourself together man. The plain simple truth is so MUCH easier to relay Eh…no discussions off the record necessary.


Mr. Ball.You have no exact memory as to the time you discovered he was not there?
Mr. Truly.No, sir; I didn't believe after thinking things over--it was over in 15 or 20 minutes after the shots were fired, but after retracing my trip to the roof and the time delay and back, I would have to say that it was farther along in the day than I had believed, so it could have been I or 1:05 or something like that.

AF: This isn't rocket-science, Mr. Truly…you either know the truth of how the events unfolded from a first person point of view, Or you are simply parroting back contrived scripted BS.

Which is it?

Are you on the take here?

Did you really notice him missing sir?

Or, did you misread your contrived script and simply lost track of what your narrative should be?


Mr. Ball.Before you discovered Oswald wasn't there?
Mr. Truly.That's right, and at such time that you have information of the officers taking the names of the workers in the warehouse over in and around the wrapping tables, it was at such time that I noticed that this boy wasn't among the other workers.

Final thoughts today:

*Why didn't Truly simply retrace his steps back up to where he said he last saw him (the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor lunchroom)?

Any reasonable personvoid of a contrived scriptwould have done so. Anyone losing a wallet/purse or set of keys simply retrace their steps back to the last place they were aware they had them.

*When he asked Bill Shelley about the whereabouts of the wrongfully accused, he could have simply requested of his subordinate to head up and check the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor lunchroom to see if he was still in there.

Any reasonable personvoid of a contrived scriptwould have.


*Why was Truly so certain the wrongfully accused was missing in a seven story building? Was he at that moment omnipresent, Or had a contrived script to follow?
After careful and deliberate study, it appears to be a foregone conclusion that DPD Officer ML Baker parked his motorcycle, and then went upstairs to enter the 1st floor Elm St entrance at about 12:31pm. And, accompanied by Building Superintendant RS Truly, proceded to the 2nd floor, and there encountered LH Oswald at the lunchroom at about 12:32pm.

It also appears to be a foregone conclusion that LH Oswald left the TSBD a short time later, and therefor at some point he was not among the building employees to be interviewed by authorities. So, I suppose one might wonder how being not at the TSBD at 1:00pm interferes with a 2nd floor encounter at 12:32pm? Yes, one might wonder.
On Friday, November 22, 1963

"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry

Into the building ='s at ground level entrance

"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".

Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level

"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell

Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor

On Saturday, November 23, 1963

Enter Mrs. Reid with a bogus claim of encountering the wrongfully accused on the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor the day before.
Her account has been proven to be an outright lie.

Why was she compelled to lie? Who gave her the bogus, contrived script?

As if Mrs. Reid's outright lie wasn't enough already, now Enters the first of a multitude of changing affidavits by Officer Baker (get your lies, err, "facts" straight man)

A contrived script has been spawned…

Off the record discussions are now a reoccurring the theme…

The only fair foregone conclusion from any objective individual would be to ask: Why all of a sudden
24hrs later--did real events have to be swept quietly away and concealed from public consumption, while being replaced with a false narrative in order to FRAME an innocent party?

The plain simple truth doesn't require discussions off the record;
a contrived script to follow;
coerced "evidence" under the paralyzing threat of Or Else;
nor reliance upon "credible" witnesses like Mrs. Reid to embellish an outright lie about a staged event that never took place.

Unlike the plain simple truth, a lie needs more lies, discussions off the record for modification sake, coercion, leading witnesses to a desired outcome regardless of the less than honourable intentions to FRAME an innocent party.

Justice is blind they say, but in the context of this criminal activity forced upon a nation, someone needs to remove her blindfold and shed light on the real culprits in the JFK case. An action looooonng overdue.

Now, back to those still lingering, unanswered questions --->

Why didn't Baker recognize the wrongfully accuse IF he really had encountered him earlier in the day in the 2nd floor lunch room?

Why doesn't Baker or Truly's testimony reflect encounters with James Jarman?


Harold Norman?


Bonnie Ray Williams?


These men used the same stairs as Baker and Truly, yet no Baker testimony about sticking his gun in their tummy's and asking Truly to vouch for them...remember, lest we forget, all of these men denied seeing Truly & Baker on the same stairwell they descended from the 5th floor, yet Truly and Baker contend they left Oswald and continued onward up the same set of stairs to the 5th floor, where these men had come down from.

Why doesn't there exist an actual film and/or video recording demonstrating that Baker actually went into the Texas School Book Depository via the front steps?

Why was the film depicting him running towards the TSBD suddenly cut off before the above question could be answered conclusively? Did someone/some entity need to hide Baker's sprint to the corner of Elm & Houston?

Who was the motorcycle officer in the white helmet who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor?

Weren't the elevators stuck according to Truly?

They couldn't have been because the motorcycle officer who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor did it in the same time sequence that employee Bonnie Ray Williams saw him get off, before making his way down the same stairs as Truly and Baker were supposedly coming up...yet no mention of a gun being stuck in Williams' midsection until Truly vouched for him....

Why did four people (Mr. Dougherty and the aforementioned three other employees) dispute Truly's claim that he called up for the elevators?

Why did Mrs. Reid feel compelled to tell an outright lie about a phantom 2nd floor encounter with the wrongfully accused? Why did Baker need four different versions to get his lies, err, "facts" straight?

All of these open, lingering questions point to a contrived script about a phantom 2nd floor encounter that simply did not happen.

The plain simple truth --->

On Friday, November 22, 1963


"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry

Into the building ='s at ground level entrance

"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".

Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level

"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell

Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor
Alan Ford Wrote:On Friday, November 22, 1963

"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry

Into the building ='s at ground level entrance

"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".

Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level

"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell

Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor

On Saturday, November 23, 1963

Enter Mrs. Reid with a bogus claim of encountering the wrongfully accused on the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor the day before.
Her account has been proven to be an outright lie.

Why was she compelled to lie? Who gave her the bogus, contrived script?

As if Mrs. Reid's outright lie wasn't enough already, now Enters the first of a multitude of changing affidavits by Officer Baker (get your lies, err, "facts" straight man)

A contrived script has been spawned…

Off the record discussions are now a reoccurring the theme…

The only fair foregone conclusion from any objective individual would be to ask: Why all of a sudden
24hrs later--did real events have to be swept quietly away and concealed from public consumption, while being replaced with a false narrative in order to FRAME an innocent party?

The plain simple truth doesn't require discussions off the record;
a contrived script to follow;
coerced "evidence" under the paralyzing threat of Or Else;
nor reliance upon "credible" witnesses like Mrs. Reid to embellish an outright lie about a staged event that never took place.

Unlike the plain simple truth, a lie needs more lies, discussions off the record for modification sake, coercion, leading witnesses to a desired outcome regardless of the less than honourable intentions to FRAME an innocent party.

Justice is blind they say, but in the context of this criminal activity forced upon a nation, someone needs to remove her blindfold and shed light on the real culprits in the JFK case. An action looooonng overdue.

Now, back to those still lingering, unanswered questions --->

Why didn't Baker recognize the wrongfully accuse IF he really had encountered him earlier in the day in the 2nd floor lunch room?

Why doesn't Baker or Truly's testimony reflect encounters with James Jarman?


Harold Norman?


Bonnie Ray Williams?


These men used the same stairs as Baker and Truly, yet no Baker testimony about sticking his gun in their tummy's and asking Truly to vouch for them...remember, lest we forget, all of these men denied seeing Truly & Baker on the same stairwell they descended from the 5th floor, yet Truly and Baker contend they left Oswald and continued onward up the same set of stairs to the 5th floor, where these men had come down from.

Why doesn't there exist an actual film and/or video recording demonstrating that Baker actually went into the Texas School Book Depository via the front steps?

Why was the film depicting him running towards the TSBD suddenly cut off before the above question could be answered conclusively? Did someone/some entity need to hide Baker's sprint to the corner of Elm & Houston?

Who was the motorcycle officer in the white helmet who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor?

Weren't the elevators stuck according to Truly?

They couldn't have been because the motorcycle officer who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor did it in the same time sequence that employee Bonnie Ray Williams saw him get off, before making his way down the same stairs as Truly and Baker were supposedly coming up...yet no mention of a gun being stuck in Williams' midsection until Truly vouched for him....

Why did four people (Mr. Dougherty and the aforementioned three other employees) dispute Truly's claim that he called up for the elevators?

Why did Mrs. Reid feel compelled to tell an outright lie about a phantom 2nd floor encounter with the wrongfully accused? Why did Baker need four different versions to get his lies, err, "facts" straight?

All of these open, lingering questions point to a contrived script about a phantom 2nd floor encounter that simply did not happen.

The plain simple truth --->

On Friday, November 22, 1963


"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry

Into the building ='s at ground level entrance

"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".

Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level

"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell

Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor

So, are you now saying LHO was encountered on a "ground floor" ? Inside the TSBD Building?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26