Jim DiEugenio Wrote:She is always interesting.
I really do not think anyone knows more about the medical evidence than she does.
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kenne...outh-knoll
Jim, I am not a radiologist but worked in a radiology department for 7 years doing ultrasound. I have looked at and used many CT scans in my work.
Referring to the first picture with the red line painted on the CT scan image is reversed. This CT scan slice of the neck normally displayed shows a bullet path on the on the left side of the neck. I assume the image has been flipped to make it match with other images to prevent confusion. Any CT scan image is displayed assuming an orientation of the feet are towards the viewer. Therefore, the right side of the image is the left side of the body.
I know this is trivial, except for someone who is used to looking at CT images. I thought, This proves the LN'er theory is false because he was shot from the right front or left rear. It took a moment to realize that computed tomography did not exist in 1963.
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:She is always interesting.
I really do not think anyone knows more about the medical evidence than she does.
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kenne...outh-knoll
Jim, I am not a radiologist but worked in a radiology department for 7 years doing ultrasound. I have looked at and used many CT scans in my work.
Referring to the first picture with the red line painted on the CT scan image is reversed. This CT scan slice of the neck normally displayed shows a bullet path on the on the left side of the neck. I assume the image has been flipped to make it match with other images to prevent confusion. Any CT scan image is displayed assuming an orientation of the feet are towards the viewer. Therefore, the right side of the image is the left side of the body.
I know this is trivial, except for someone who is used to looking at CT images. I thought, This proves the LN'er theory is false because he was shot from the right front or left rear. It took a moment to realize that computed tomography did not exist in 1963.
In order to verify this evidence one must hold a college degree, perhaps an advanced degree.
How is this evidence preferable to medical evidence which doesn't require anything more than sentience?
The case for the throat entrance and T3 back wound are prima facie, bitchez.
The JFK Assassination Master Class -- where redundancies are treated like revelations.