In my years arguing with the official story folks i found one argument particularly odd Fact one they are confident that the damage from the impact and fires from the jetliners collisions with the towers was sufficient to have caused the collapses But when you mention demolition, the requirements to have brought down the structures suddenly change and now it requires a massive preparatory scheme that would have had to have gotten at all the core columns, and other pivotal support structures, and would have taken weeks if not months of preparation to have accomplished Hopefully that gaping contradiction does not need further elaboration Perhaps obvios to many of you but I have never seen it clearly stated
Matt Grantham Wrote:In my years arguing with the official story folks i found one argument particularly odd Fact one they are confident that the damage from the impact and fires from the jetliners collisions with the towers was sufficient to have caused the collapses But when you mention demolition, the requirements to have brought down the structures suddenly change and now it requires a massive preparatory scheme that would have had to have gotten at all the core columns, and other pivotal support structures, and would have taken weeks if not months of preparation to have accomplished Hopefully that gaping contradiction does not need further elaboration Perhaps obvious to many of you but I have never seen it clearly stated
I don't see any contradiction. Like any false-flag covert operation it did take months of VERY careful preparation; and the how, when, where of that has all been worked out IMO. The best single source is by Kevin Ryan. Part I of V parts is here:
http://911truth.org/demolition-access-to-the-world-trade-center-towers-part-one-tenants/
I strongly suggest you read all parts.
Welcome to the Forum Matt. Please take some time to read up on some of the issues that have been covered before. An external search engine limited to this website works better than the internal search engine - or you can just look at all the 911 threads here and dig in.
Thanks for the reply Perhaps my point is not clear The contradiction is in the mind of those believing in the official story On the one hand they believe a plane impact explains the collapse , on the other hand they believe it would have taken weeks or months to have wired the building to create the conditions to bring it down in the fashion scene Are those not two different standards for the conditions for global collapse?