07-10-2018, 03:39 PM
08-10-2018, 02:30 AM
You mean this?
08-10-2018, 02:43 AM
This proves how the tabloids are full of ****, and what's been delivered to you in the PDF you've read regarding Watergate AND JFK is / are indisputable.
09-10-2018, 05:45 AM
Some may ask what's my point? Topic is "General made preparations behind presidents back to Nuke Vietnam" but, how can that be true if the president himself was briefed in the memo above?
Sign,
God, I got it!
Sign,
God, I got it!
13-10-2018, 01:28 AM
I just heard historian Michael Beschloss on Chris Matthews tonight repeat the "rumor" that LBJ had to restrain his generals from using nukes in Vietnam. After 50 years you would think this would be widely known already if there were anything to it.
They may be dredging this stuff up to raise the specter of Trump and his generals having a disagreement (or maybe not a disagreement) on the issue of using nukes in theater wars.
James Lateer
They may be dredging this stuff up to raise the specter of Trump and his generals having a disagreement (or maybe not a disagreement) on the issue of using nukes in theater wars.
James Lateer
17-10-2018, 12:07 PM
James Lateer Wrote:I just heard historian Michael Beschloss on Chris Matthews tonight repeat the "rumor" that LBJ had to restrain his generals from using nukes in Vietnam. After 50 years you would think this would be widely known already if there were anything to it.
They may be dredging this stuff up to raise the specter of Trump and his generals having a disagreement (or maybe not a disagreement) on the issue of using nukes in theater wars.
James Lateer
After 50 years you'd think folks would've learned who the culprits behind whacking Jack were, but, I don't think they really know, unless someone spoke out.