Deep Politics Forum

In case you missed it the first (or second or third) time, here is a short but important video on 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwq04_KhC...r_embedded

Interesting Ed. I remember watching the events unfold at the time and Brit TV had a well-known Israeli pol (sadly I can't remember who now poor old sod that I am) on TV giving the whole Osama bin-Laden cover story explanation. His appearance seemed clearly pre-planned to my way of thinking.

I just wanted to mention that the alleged identification in the video of the Harley guy as the actor Mark Humphrey is doubtful and denied by the man. He claims to have been in L.A. on 9/11.
So would the real Harley guy please speak up!

Good digging Carsten.

David Guyatt Wrote:Interesting Ed. I remember watching the events unfold at the time and Brit TV had a well-known Israeli pol (sadly I can't remember who now poor old sod that I am) on TV giving the whole Osama bin-Laden cover story explanation. His appearance seemed clearly pre-planned to my way of thinking.

Yes, I recall seeing clips of that, and attempting to find them again. Was that well-known Israeli politician perhaps Bibi Militovsky?


[/FONT]

Carsten Wiethoff Wrote:I just wanted to mention that the alleged identification in the video of the Harley guy as the actor Mark Humphrey is doubtful and denied by the man. He claims to have been in L.A. on 9/11.
So would the real Harley guy please speak up!

Link?

And, irregardless of who it was, it is indeed curious that this bystander shows up with the on-the-spot theory, before all the dust had settled, which was to be the grit and gristle of the NIST/Poppular Mechancis pseudo-make-believe-now-thoroughly-debunked "science".

Even if you don't buy the theory behind the peer-reviewed nano-thermite paper, F will always equally M times A, Newton's Laws have not been demonstrated to be repealed or on vacation that morning, and the extensive outward ejection of steel girders, body parts and the incredibly-huge pyroclastic volumes of micron-sized dust did not stem from burning anything.

So it doesn't really matter who the Harley Guy was. He's just a fascinating aberration in the wrinkle of time that was present on that severe clear morning.

Ed Jewett Wrote:Link?

And, irregardless of who it was, it is indeed curious that this bystander shows up with the on-the-spot theory, before all the dust had settled, which was to be the grit and gristle of the NIST/Poppular Mechancis pseudo-make-believe-now-thoroughly-debunked "science".

...

So it doesn't really matter who the Harley Guy was. He's just a fascinating aberration in the wrinkle of time that was present on that severe clear morning.

Hi Ed,
there is a question and answer thread with Humphrey here:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/1670129/1/

Of course you are absolutely right, it does not really matter, WHO the Harley guy was, it is more than obvious WHAT he was. But naturally a positive identification might help. Just be damned sure you get that id right.:beer:

Quote:“I do not wish to make a mystery,” said he, laughing. “The matter was perfectly simple. You, of course, saw that everyone in the street was an accomplice. They were all engaged for the evening.”

Holmes to Watson, Scandal in Bohemia.