Deep Politics Forum

...a patsy to a piece of deep state terrorism

Quote:Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The Identification of Mohammed Sidique Khan

Week 7 of the 7/7 Inquests drew to a close with the revelations of how Mohammed Sidique Khan was identified on Circle Line train 216 at Edgware Road.

In much the same way as Shehzad Tanweer apparently all but 'disintegrated' on the Aldgate train a similar story emerged in relation to Khan.

Apart from Danny Biddle, whose testimony we analysed here, none of the 23 passengers from carriage 2, that gave testimony or had statements read to the Inquests, mentioned seeing Khan. Despite many having been on the train for the five stops between King's Cross and Edgware Road, Khan wasn't seen. Nor was there any mention of an Asian man wearing a white baseball cap sitting in seat 27.

The Inquests were shown a diagram of the probable positions of passengers before the explosion which strangely has Khan sitting alone in a bank of four seats:

http://77inquests.blogspot.com/2010/11/i...-khan.html

Paul Rigby Wrote:...a patsy to a piece of deep state terrorism

Quote:Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The Identification of Mohammed Sidique Khan

Week 7 of the 7/7 Inquests drew to a close with the revelations of how Mohammed Sidique Khan was identified on Circle Line train 216 at Edgware Road.

In much the same way as Shehzad Tanweer apparently all but 'disintegrated' on the Aldgate train a similar story emerged in relation to Khan.

Apart from Danny Biddle, whose testimony we analysed here, none of the 23 passengers from carriage 2, that gave testimony or had statements read to the Inquests, mentioned seeing Khan. Despite many having been on the train for the five stops between King's Cross and Edgware Road, Khan wasn't seen. Nor was there any mention of an Asian man wearing a white baseball cap sitting in seat 27.

The Inquests were shown a diagram of the probable positions of passengers before the explosion which strangely has Khan sitting alone in a bank of four seats:

http://77inquests.blogspot.com/2010/11/i...-khan.html

Someone must have seen them...

Paul Rigby Wrote:...a patsy to a piece of deep state terrorism

Quote:Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The Identification of Mohammed Sidique Khan

Week 7 of the 7/7 Inquests drew to a close with the revelations of how Mohammed Sidique Khan was identified on Circle Line train 216 at Edgware Road.

In much the same way as Shehzad Tanweer apparently all but 'disintegrated' on the Aldgate train a similar story emerged in relation to Khan.

Apart from Danny Biddle, whose testimony we analysed here, none of the 23 passengers from carriage 2, that gave testimony or had statements read to the Inquests, mentioned seeing Khan. Despite many having been on the train for the five stops between King's Cross and Edgware Road, Khan wasn't seen. Nor was there any mention of an Asian man wearing a white baseball cap sitting in seat 27.

The Inquests were shown a diagram of the probable positions of passengers before the explosion which strangely has Khan sitting alone in a bank of four seats:

http://77inquests.blogspot.com/2010/11/i...-khan.html

Paul - all

I had quite a little spat with Bridget Dunne on Nick Kollerstrom's blog here a couple of weeks ago. It made me take care in preparing a comment for the piece you excerpt above, the burden of which was that, in spite of our spat, to thank her for her impressive analysis and to ask if she agreed that it had finally tipped the balance of probability in favour of the explosions having been caused by something other than "4 suicide bombers" for her.

When I came to post the comment I found I wasn't signed in to blogger so, without thinking, I auto-signed in though my own blog on another tab then refreshed the comment page tab. BANG ! - carefully prepared comment vanished. Couldn't summon the energy to redo it.

It's a long post but anyone reading it all - together with several other analyses of the earlier Inquest evidence sessions on both the J7 and NK's blogs can be left in little if any doubt that there were no suicide bombers in London on 7 July 2005; Patsies? - maybe - determined homegrown murderous suicide bombers? With similar probabilitiy to the moon being made of green cheese.

The diagrams supplied by the Met; the data from London Transport automated reporting systems; the evidence about operational and personal phones; consistent evidence about the number of dead bodies at each location from both the police and others - and a host of other damning details really do blow the official narrative away.

It is little wonder that our shiny new Coalition are furiously backpedaling in their pre-election commitment to a proper inquiry. It's pretty clear that they will have very serious problems fixing even a "Proper" Inquiry.

Peter, I wonder if her so very defensive behaviour is motivated by a fear that you might be an agent provocateur for HM spooks? Just a passing thought.

But on the broader point you make, I agree that the official 7/7 narrative is completely buggered.

David Guyatt Wrote:Peter, I wonder if her so very defensive behaviour is motivated by a fear that you might be an agent provocateur for HM spooks? Just a passing thought.

But on the broader point you make, I agree that the official 7/7 narrative is completely buggered.

"Oh wad some power the giftie gie us" eh?

Never thought of that.

I guess, from A N Other's perspective I could be. Spooky!

I reckon the subject would make for a good thread. How can any of us be sure that anyone here is not working for the Spooks?

I'm not. :dontknow::questionmark:

Been having a chat today about Assange and Wikileaks with a friend whose dad was 'in that line of work'. His dad referred to that 'community' as the secret squirrel 'community' and said they were all idiots. Been laughing all day at that.

A bit off topic sorry. :goodnight:

David Guyatt Wrote:I'm not. :dontknow::questionmark:

If I am I want my long overdue back pay [and flashy women and cars a la Bond 007]! [No Gareth Williams North Face Bags, Please!]

But seriously, it seems to me while both the 911 Truth and 7-7 Truth movements have had a hard time due to official opposition; MSM blackout and the 'average Joe and Jane's' incredulity that their own loverly Nation could do such a thing......it seems to me that the 7/7 affair, being smaller and easier, IMO, to prove the lie would be the place to put the lever and apply pressure...for if it opened up and the Big Lie were exposed, the larger [on all levels] Bigger Lie of 9-11 would fall like a house of cards....

Back pay with interest. :beerglass:

You are right Peter that 7/7 is smaller and perhaps easier to expose. A weaker link in the chain. Some very pertinent things have already been exposed. These need to get more traction.