First time I have seen this one. Very interesting.
Indeed, I think we should all take a while to think a Bout this before we hasten to any conclusions.
Magda Hassan Wrote:First time I have seen this one. Very interesting.
VERY interesting!~ Never seen that one before. Important would be to know if provenance and to find others...there are SO many other CCTV footage [mostly all confiscated by FBI and Military etc.]. Ten years is too long for this BIG LIE to have 'legs'...the BIG LIE of Dallas has sadly had 'legs' for all too many for nearly 50! America and the World will NOT survive 911's Big Lie and the wars etc. that follow from it lasting 50 years...this much I know! :nono:
At the end we see a special effects-generated nuclear missile attack.
Does the streaking "missile" in that footage remind you of the object seen impacting the Pentagon?
I'm betting this video is fakery in service to disinformation.
Charles Drago Wrote:At the end we see a special effects-generated nuclear missile attack.
Does the streaking "missile" in that footage remind you of the object seen impacting the Pentagon?
I'm betting this video is fakery in service to disinformation.
That it could well be, Charles, and whenEVER we see such, we must think both that it MAY be either REAL footage that someone has let slip; OR that it is more synthetic bullshit photoshop [or video equivalent] produced by the Wizards of OZ and LIES in the Ministry of Misdeeds in the service of Empire and Oligarchy. angryfire
Charles Drago Wrote:I'm betting this video is fakery in service to disinformation.
Totally agree. After ten years this turns up? From where? Sorry, I'm beyond dubious.
I'm currently studying Adobe After Effects and other post-production compositing and FX software. It's relatively easy to fake a shot like this, and I'd personally guess a fake is what this shot is. (I appreciate I'm describing the obvious to most here). You just do two things to the footage to fake it.
First stabilise the shaky or moving footage. This can now be done with a single button press in After Effects CS5.5, which came out some months back. In fact the big selling point for the software was how easy it was to stabilise jittery or shaky footage in just a couple of mouse clicks.
Then, paint or animate the moving missile and impact onto the footage. Move a white blur along a path, add some softness and further blur to it, and animate a white flash at the end.
Then, when you've finished, reverse the stabilisation so the footage goes back to its shaky original self, but now with the 'missile' added.
The guy seems quite calm about his revelation - 'gee, where did this footage come from?'. The 'missile' impact also seems pretty mild. Like others here I'm inclined to believe the clip is a goofy fake.
Video of Missile Hitting Pentagon
August 26, 2011
The following 3-minute video contains footage of what appears to be a white missile-like object hitting the Pentagon on 9/11. This video first appeared in September 2010 and I wrote about it at the time in this article. The footage of the missile strike, if authentic, seems to come from a helicopter hovering near the Pentagon when it was struck.
In the video the white streaking object seems to approach from the inverse angle of what actually struck the Pentagon. It may be that the image has been reversed but it doesn't seem to jibe with the direction seen in the ASCE Pentagon report.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Pentagon_damage.JPG
This video also seems to misrepresent the exit hole as the point of entry on the outer wall. The hole seen in the video is actually the exit hole that the missile made after breaking through three rings (including six exterior walls and numerous structural columns) of the Pentagon. It should be noted that the photo of the exit hole was taken by the FBI, which prevented the engineers who investigated the damage at the Pentagon from examining this crucial area.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Bollyn, Christopher, "Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon", September 21, 2010
http://www.bollyn.com/video-of-missile-h...e-pentagon
Bollyn, "The John Birch Society & 9-11 Disinfo", May 6, 2005
http://www.bollyn.com/the-john-birch-soc...11-disinfo
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_13151
A goofy fake done with either After Effects, or more likely Final Cut Pro.
Anthony Thorne Wrote:The guy seems quite calm about his revelation - 'gee, where did this footage come from?'. The 'missile' impact also seems pretty mild. Like others here I'm inclined to believe the clip is a goofy fake.
How do we explain away John Judge visiting the Pentagon the next day with his friend T. Carter who was supposed to be a stewardess on the plane that hit the Pentagon the day before. She was sick & didn't make the flight. She identified the fabric on the seats of the AA jet as the same as on the plane she would have flown on if she hadn't called in sick.