Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: Cahalan and the sorrow of Morrow. Quality Versus Quantity?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Keith Millea Wrote:I understand the topic.But,first let me apologize to Don Jefferies for my earlier rant about the Education Forum.I am sorry for that rant Don,but please understand that it was a final mark of frustration for me.I have for about four years now been reading the EF every morning.I will say that I have learned much about the JFK assassination,and I owe that to those great researchers over at that forum.However,I can no longer wade through all the shit flinging,and piles of dung that are presented on that forum everyday.This final straw,acceptance of the perverted Morrow as good debate(theater?),tells me that the Education Forum itself,is more concerned with numbers and rank,than any real search for the truth.Can you not see that Morrow is playing you all?

Yes,the theatrics may bring in more views,as people like a good round of shit flinging.Hell,Fetzer can create 50 pages and 25,000 views with the crap he puts up for debate.Alas,in the end,50 pages of wasted time.Quality VS Quantity.....I have deleted the Education Forum from my favorites list,and will not be going back.Quantity means nothing to me.

I wish you well Don,

Keith

Keith - yup.

However, this DPF thread is not exactly a shining example of serious debate furthering the cause of deep political research.

Please can all members always try and make it clear whose words appear in their post.

If they are the words of that member, that should be fairly obvious.

However, if you are quoting another person, please use the QUOTE symbols which appear in the toolbar when you're composing the post.

If you're quoting an article, please provide the source in a meaningful form. Ideally, author and where & when published. If you know how to do it, embedding the link in a meaningful word or phrase is ideal.

This is a serious research site, so please try and provide information in a useful fashion.

My gut reaction to this thread is best summarised by Iggy Pop:


Quote:I'm bored

I'm the chairman of the bored,
I'm a lengthy monologue
I'm livin' like a dog

I'm bored

I bore myself to sleep at night
I bore myself in broad daylight coz

I'm bored
Seamus,

I don't have anything for you to read. I worked behind the scenes with Skolnick and with Myers. I conducted a tremendous amount of research into the matter, but others compiled my work with theirs into various essays. I am more than willing to discontinue associating your name with JFK Jr. research.

BTW: I think you misunderstood my comment about impropriety. I was referring to your perception that Hankey's article had the appearance of impropriety, not you.
Greg Burnham Wrote:Seamus,

I don't have anything for you to read. I worked behind the scenes with Skolnick and with Myers. I conducted a tremendous amount of research into the matter, but others compiled my work with theirs into various essays. I am more than willing to discontinue associating your name with JFK Jr. research.

BTW: I think you misunderstood my comment about impropriety. I was referring to your perception that Hankey's article had the appearance of impropriety, not you.

Thanks GB my heart felt very heavy getting that frustrated in such a manner with a decent bloke such as yourself. I look forward to viewing the JFK Jr thread and learning more of the in's and outs of the case.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:
Greg Burnham Wrote:Seamus,

I don't have anything for you to read. I worked behind the scenes with Skolnick and with Myers. I conducted a tremendous amount of research into the matter, but others compiled my work with theirs into various essays. I am more than willing to discontinue associating your name with JFK Jr. research.

BTW: I think you misunderstood my comment about impropriety. I was referring to your perception that Hankey's article had the appearance of impropriety, not you.

Thanks GB my heart felt very heavy getting that frustrated in such a manner with a decent bloke such as yourself. I look forward to viewing the JFK Jr thread and learning more of the in's and outs of the case.

Sounds good. Cheers, Mate--
Mr. Myers did a fantastic news excerpt video series on the coverage of the JFK jr issues. It was not speculative but news broadcasts current of the time.
I highly recommend it, I'll have to search my own archives to see where it is that I have those videos.
It was oddly quite strange to watch the story break from a wiser perspective (at least I hope wiser) than I held in '63 at age 10.
[Speculation Alert]
IMHO I was watching the fable drop into the news rooms of the media-empire talking heads and onto my lap.
FWIW.
Jim
Best to all.
Jim Hackett II Wrote:Mr. Myers did a fantastic news excerpt video series on the coverage of the JFK jr issues. It was not speculative but news broadcasts current of the time.
I highly recommend it, I'll have to search my own archives to see where it is that I have those videos.
It was oddly quite strange to watch the story break from a wiser perspective (at least I hope wiser) than I held in '63 at age 10.
[Speculation Alert]
IMHO I was watching the fable drop into the news rooms of the media-empire talking heads and onto my lap.
FWIW.
Jim
Best to all.

Hi Jim,

Hope things are going well for you. Yes, Scott did a brilliant job of compiling all the news coverage into one video. Even if a person had not questioned the official story up until seeing that video--it surely would have caused them to question/doubt--if not know something was wrong--afterwards.
Yes Sir,
Things are better than once was the case personally, 'nuff said 'bout that. I thank you kindly for the compassion.
I MUST extend compliments to you Sir, for the work I have seen and much that I don't know about, Always exemplary.

Just a little more non research related words. It is hard to lose parents is it not. No matter how prepared one thinks one can be, it is never really a state of readiness for the temporary separations attending such.

While I was not "on-line" the research continued, with a re-start of flying R/C as my Pop kept wanting me to do. It is my relief when I need to take the breath and relax.

You Sir, keep swiping the oars of the enemy canoes rowing up crap creek as you so ably do. LOL.
Again
Best to all
God Bless You and Yours on this Easter Weekend, Greg.

I once swore an oath to defend and protect the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. That oath NEVER expires, even when one no longer wears a uniform. I think Fletcher Prouty and Penn Jones Jr. would agree. It is our Republic and I want it back.
Welcome Jim,

Quote:I once swore an oath to defend and protect the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. That oath NEVER expires, even when one no longer wears a uniform.

Hai:Well hey,I'm on a Samurai movie watchathon right now......lol

(Hai is the Japanese word for Yes)

Quote:It is our Republic and I want it back.

We'll never get it back until this Nations soldiers,veterans,and police force,become aware that the Constitution has been subverted.Until these groups "turn",real change will not happen.
WeThePeople do need to reclaim our heritage. No one can do it for us.
We can change our personal paradigm. More and more are doing so. I perceive much awakening in the younger generations.
Our more youthful citizens are the hope for a future, they were left a mess to live through and address.
Knowing that fact is step one. It changes the paradigm maybe giving the choice of what to do about the issue. Deny or be empowered.
One choice unhealthy and one healthy. One self deceptive and one not.
The truth will set you free but first it will make you angry.

I wish I could watch some documentaries, but I gotta go help cook and domestic stuff like that. Not complaining just wishing.
Best Regards
Jim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I once swore an oath to defend and protect the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. That oath NEVER expires, even when one no longer wears a uniform. I think Fletcher Prouty and Penn Jones Jr. would agree. It is our Republic and I want it back. Semper Fidelis.
Uniforms and oaths sworn to protect laws of nations are precisely the problem.

Deny this, make tribalism your default position, and none of the good we seek will be attained.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9