The following is an exercise of my right to free speech:
There is a new entity on the EF. "Mike Rago" is somewhat less obvious about it than most, but his modus operandi is signature. Unlike the vast majority
of "entities" this one does not post at all hours of the day and night nor does he post an inordinately suspicious volume per post nor a suspicious quantity
of total posts over a given period of time.
However, for a newbie, his subject matter of interest is "all over the yard" and his ignorance is equally distributed throughout. The crowning jewel though
is his arrogance. It is an insincere arrogance. It is contrived--designed to draw the gullible into a debate in which there will be doppelgängers a plenty to
go around for all so engaged.
Disguised as a trivial little man of no consequence, he is nothing of the sort.
Great minds think alike, Greg.
"Rago" is the entity to whom I refer in my recently created thread, "'Cinque' Redux?"
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...quot-Redux
In demonstrating the similarities of the intellectual and logical flaws of the "Rago" posts to those inherent in all of "Cinque," I offered the following:
I have solved the Black Dog Man mystery by applying my superior photo interpretation skills to the attached image.
Note the melting skull to the right of Black Cloak Man.
Note that Black Cloak Man, facing to the left in an obvious attempt to implicate liberals in JFK's death, clearly is holding the mutilated torso of Marilyn Monroe as viewed from the rear (and don't try to tell me that such an ass could have belonged to any other woman in history).
Note that Black Cloak Man is wearing a black cloak -- a fashion statement most closely identified with Satan worshipers.
It's all so simple if only we choose to see ...
And while "Rago" may be a living human being as well as a disinformation-carrying multiple entity, I nonetheless find the similarity of his last name to my own to be ... interesting.
Please don't move this to my earlier thread.
The more attention we draw to the return of the "Cinque" operation, the better.
You've been cutting "Rago" to ribbons on EF, and in the process flushing "him" out of the darkness to the point where "he" has posted the following:
"If I am 'cocky' it is because the alternative theories are just so bizarre that the SBT makes a lot sense in comparison."
Ignorance and arrogance expressed in classic "Cinque"/disinformationalist fashion.
It's only a matter of time before Jim Fetzer takes "Rago" to his bosom.
Yeah I am familiar with this dude via Lancer. He had a run in with Joe Backes who then proceeded to stove his head in alongside Randy Owen (love that bloke). This was over some supposed bullet fragment the guy saw flying out of the limo after a bullet hit the windshield frame. Joe makes some good observations about the Forums and about Cinque and Boner, thus he appears to be very much on the same page as you guys.
http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.co.nz/...ation.html
and here as well
http://justiceforkennedy.blogspot.co.nz/...lysis.html
What's really odd though is I swear blind this Magoo has been around for a longer period than say 2011 when he joined up at Lancer. Do I think he's making a play on CD's name maybe? It's hard to say but I'll keep an eye out for earlier posts. What I think he's doing is making a move to mock people like Cyril Wecht, who set up his forensics specialist course at Duquesne University in about 2003. My reasoning is Rago's unfettered love for bollocks forensic type evidence he presents. Not only that the guy who was running it for Cyril on the Duquesne campus is a well liked guy called 'John Rago'. Hence this is why the name stuck, I'd probably heard it as a result of looking into Wechts stuff some years ago. This was incidentally about the same time Wecht was having major troubles with the bullshit fraud case being bought up against him. Indeed Rago himself would get in trouble with the University authorities I think because of his ties to Wecht, one imagines that the powers that be were out to screw em both. Here's some articles anyhow that might give some pause for thought. At least it gives an idea about the use of the name 'Rago'. Note Rago knew he would not be up for a resumption of his contract a year ago...ironically it's around the same time this Mike Rago schelp turned up at Lancer.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/loca...re-480666/
http://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/st...tory8.html
I think the name Rago is a derivative of your name Drago but without the D, so in a way they are being cocky.
They are trying to make fun of you. Idiots in every way.
Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:I think the name Rago is a derivative of your name Drago but without the D, so in a way they are being cocky.
They are trying to make fun of you. Idiots in every way.
I don't know, Vasilios. Coincidences happen.
One option: The real life Rago has been conscripted, and "Rago" is the result.
But the last thing in the world I want to promote is the notion that I'm important enough to be attacked/utilized in this manner.
Trust me: I'm not.
You are important to us though.
Charles Drago Wrote:Please don't move this to my earlier thread.
The more attention we draw to the return of the "Cinque" operation, the better.
You've been cutting "Rago" to ribbons on EF, and in the process flushing "him" out of the darkness to the point where "he" has posted the following:
"If I am 'cocky' it is because the alternative theories are just so bizarre that the SBT makes a lot sense in comparison."
Ignorance and arrogance expressed in classic "Cinque"/disinformationalist fashion.
It's only a matter of time before Jim Fetzer takes "Rago" to his bosom.
Enter the Fetzer:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3927[/ATTACH]
Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:You are important to us though.
Thank you.