Deep Politics Forum

Full Version: 2016: The Movie
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
CBS Scott Paulsen on "2016: The Movie" The Right Politics

This past week, "2016: The Movie" about President Barack Obama opened in the Chicago area, and I chose to get more of an education about Obama by seeing the movie. After the inundation of canned hype for the movie on conservative talk shows across the Chicago radio dial that sounded more like commercials than honest endorsements of the movie, I was skeptical of what I was going to see.

Yet, I'm glad I saw the hyped-film because it was more informative than I had thought it would be and included less propaganda than I had predicted. If anything, it was nearly too informative as there was an enormous amount of information condensed into the nearly one-hour-and-a-half documentary. Fact after fact is put forth which shows that President Obama definitely has many skeletons in the closet that have not been released prior to the nation's trust in him with the Oval Office. To watch this movie and realize or simply be reminded of all that is unknown about President Obama is of concern.

Much of the information has been ignored by the American media totally. When appropriately reminded as to what is still unknown about Obama to date, one has to ask: How can any logical-thinking person give a damn about Romney's taxes while not asking any questions regarding our current President's past? The man influences the entire globe, but liberal Americans want to know how much Mitt Romney paid in taxes in the past rather than learn about the man who they have entrusted with the country.

Unbelievable.

The movie undeniably links Obama to persons of suspicious-interest due to their past actions and statements, such as former radical activist and Chicago educator Bill Ayers. While the media and blinded-liberals cast such facts aside, the movie does not. No, this portion of the movie is not propaganda it is the display of factual information about relationships between people that cannot be denied. Yet, the "left" does deny the facts that are right in front of them.

Quite disturbing is the talk of the United States economy in the film. The current national debt which has increased two-fold during Obama's presidency and the horrendous economy is suggested to be part of the plan to strip the nation of democracy reasonable cause to make citizens totally dependent on the government. The "left" is aghast at this suggestion of the current economy. They actually believe that Obama is unintelligent enough to let this economy just happen. Ironically, it's many of the people on the "right" who know Obama's not stupid, and much of what has happened to the United States in the past four years is part of Obama's plan.

How could one so-highly educated and intelligent as Obama not know what he was doing when he incurred such debt? I left the movie thinking more strongly than I had in the past that the current debt and this economy was part of Obama's plan all along. Increasingly making Americans dependent on the government is the plan. What's more, he knew his blind followers would believe it was not the plan and, of course, was all Bush's fault.

He must be laughing at his blind followers all the way to the "new America" they're allowing him to create. My belief is that Obama continues to prey on his die-hard followers' stupidity to accomplish his personal goals for America.

The most disturbing part of the film to me was the interview with President Obama's half-brother George Obama from Nairobi, Kenya. How can Obama claim to want to help people when he has done absolutely nothing for his own family? It makes me wonder if he really cares about anybody if he can't find it in his heart to help his own family.

As the closing credits started to role upward across the screen, the audience applauded. Me, I just walked out reasonably upset.

Those who have already decided to vote for Obama will probably not even see the movie. It's sad but they probably don't want to know the truth when it is laid out so clearly for them in this documentary. The independents who are still deciding who they are going to vote for ought to see this film. I'm quite confident that any undecided voter who sees this film will know who to vote for after viewing this documentary. If you know you're not going to support the "left" in this coming election, see the film out of interest if you like. But, fair warning, it's disturbing and quite frightening to say the least.
Who is Scott Paulsen?Shrug
LR Trotter Wrote:Who is Scott Paulsen?Shrug

According to Wiki:

Scott Paulsen is an American radio personality, columnist, and voice actor based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paulsen began working for WDVE, a Pittsburgh classic rock station, in the 1980s. He became a "morning staple" in the Pittsburgh region on WDVE Morning Show, which he co-hosted with Jim Krenn.[SUP][1][/SUP] Paulsen left the Morning Show and went on hiatus from WDVE for 11 months in 1999.[SUP][1][/SUP] He returned to WDVE in 2000 as a solo host The Scott Paulsen Radio Broadcast' in the evening time slot.[SUP][2][/SUP] Paulsen left for WRKZ in December 2006 and took over the afternoon drive time slot. In keeping with the station's talk format, his new show focused more on guests, interviews, and phone calls than music. Paulsen left WKRZ when it changed to a Top 40 format and began a sports talk show with Eddy Crow and Mike Logan on ESPN 1250.
Paulsen writes a regular column for the Washington, Pennsylvania-based Observer-Reporter.[SUP][3][/SUP] He has also published numerous books including Cow Tipping and Night Fruit Army. In the 1990s, he and Jim Krenn provided voice talents for Nickelodeon's Kablam![SUP][4][/SUP] NFL Films used an interview with Paulsen in 2006's Steelers program.[SUP][5][/SUP]
On Monday September 27, 2010 Scott along with Mike Logan, Stan Savran, Guy Junker, Ken Laird and Chris Mack were let go from ESPN RADIO 1250. "It was a business decision," said Tim McCarthy, senior vice president for ESPN Audio. Source: Jerry DiPiola Pittsburgh Tribune Review.
On Thursday January 19, 2012 It was announced that Scott Paulsen was returning to the WDVE Morning Show.[SUP][6][/SUP][SUP][7][/SUP]
Are you listening? Strategy of tension.


Greg Burnham Wrote:
LR Trotter Wrote:Who is Scott Paulsen?Shrug

According to Wiki:

Scott Paulsen is an American radio personality, columnist, and voice actor based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paulsen began working for WDVE, a Pittsburgh classic rock station, in the 1980s. He became a "morning staple" in the Pittsburgh region on WDVE Morning Show, which he co-hosted with Jim Krenn.[SUP][1][/SUP] Paulsen left the Morning Show and went on hiatus from WDVE for 11 months in 1999.[SUP][1][/SUP] He returned to WDVE in 2000 as a solo host The Scott Paulsen Radio Broadcast' in the evening time slot.[SUP][2][/SUP] Paulsen left for WRKZ in December 2006 and took over the afternoon drive time slot. In keeping with the station's talk format, his new show focused more on guests, interviews, and phone calls than music. Paulsen left WKRZ when it changed to a Top 40 format and began a sports talk show with Eddy Crow and Mike Logan on ESPN 1250.
Paulsen writes a regular column for the Washington, Pennsylvania-based Observer-Reporter.[SUP][3][/SUP] He has also published numerous books including Cow Tipping and Night Fruit Army. In the 1990s, he and Jim Krenn provided voice talents for Nickelodeon's Kablam![SUP][4][/SUP] NFL Films used an interview with Paulsen in 2006's Steelers program.[SUP][5][/SUP]
On Monday September 27, 2010 Scott along with Mike Logan, Stan Savran, Guy Junker, Ken Laird and Chris Mack were let go from ESPN RADIO 1250. "It was a business decision," said Tim McCarthy, senior vice president for ESPN Audio. Source: Jerry DiPiola Pittsburgh Tribune Review.
On Thursday January 19, 2012 It was announced that Scott Paulsen was returning to the WDVE Morning Show.[SUP][6][/SUP][SUP][7][/SUP]

Thanks Mr Burnham. I was just trying to find the connection to CBS. Confused
Greg,

In this film, did you see or hear anything mentioned about Obama's relationship with his college mentor and major professor at Columbia University, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the "father" of Al Qaeda and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller? Obama majored in International Relations at Columbia University.

He also received a lot of Wall Street money during his 2008 campaign. Is Wall Street left-wing?

As for the debt, are you sure that the debt is not for the unpaid wars of the Bush-Cheney administrations of trillions of dollars, and the continued war not only in Afghanistan but elsewhere? Those military bases we have in some many other countries all over the world cost a lot of money.

I believe the people of the United States are more concerned with the character of Mitt Romney, his honesty and integrity, or lack of such qualities, than his actual income. Therefore, the interest in his unknown taxes and where he keeps his wealth off shore are legitimate questions for a presidential candidate. Aren't U.S. banks good enough for him?

I don't think the film could be totally honest. As for Ayers, isn't he the son of extremdely wealthy parents? How sincerely 'left' can people like that be?

Just something to think about.

Adele

P.S. Thal's a nice picture of you. Hugs
Adele Edisen Wrote:Greg,

In this film, did you see or hear anything mentioned about Obama's relationship with his college mentor and major professor at Columbia University, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the "father" of Al Qaeda and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller? Obama majored in International Relations at Columbia University.

He also received a lot of Wall Street money during his 2008 campaign. Is Wall Street left-wing?

As for the debt, are you sure that the debt is not for the unpaid wars of the Bush-Cheney administrations of trillions of dollars, and the continued war not only in Afghanistan but elsewhere? Those military bases we have in some many other countries all over the world cost a lot of money.

I believe the people of the United States are more concerned with the character of Mitt Romney, his honesty and integrity, or lack of such qualities, than his actual income. Therefore, the interest in his unknown taxes and where he keeps his wealth off shore are legitimate questions for a presidential candidate. Aren't U.S. banks good enough for him?

I don't think the film could be totally honest. As for Ayers, isn't he the son of extremdely wealthy parents? How sincerely 'left' can people like that be?

Just something to think about.

Adele

P.S. That's a nice picture of you. Hugs

Hi sweetie,

I haven't seen the movie myself! I just posted Paulsen's review of it. I may see it, but I'm not sure that I even need any more convincing.
ahh.... sounds like more reich-wing paranoia sprinkled with that old-time commie-anarchist under every rock nonsense... The GOP needs new script writers! Better yet, they need I-D-E-A-S. Not to mention a real presidential candidate!
David Healy Wrote:ahh.... sounds like more reich-wing paranoia sprinkled with that old-time commie-anarchist under every rock nonsense... The GOP needs new script writers! Better yet, they need I-D-E-A-S. Not to mention a real presidential candidate!

David! Good to see you, buddy. I personally don't see a lot of difference between the political parties. At the end of the day We The People always seem to get screwed.
It doesn't matter if the prick comes from the left or the right, we still get stuck.
[Image: ImageProxy.mvc?bicild=&canary=yfMkDQzJwC...ader_1.jpg]
This week's show #597 features Gov. Jesse Ventura and Dick Russell

[Image: ImageProxy.mvc?bicild=&canary=yfMkDQzJwC...2fbook.jpg]
Pages: 1 2