James H. Fetzer Wrote:Myra, They probably did not want to risk being shot--or making themselves more conspicuous and drawing attention. Who would have believed that anyone would be discussing these things in such minute detail nearly fifty years after the assassination? Jim

Jack White Wrote:In another slide from my Duluth presentation, I expressed
my opinion about Chauncey.

Jack

Myra Bronstein Wrote:

Jack White Wrote:In another slide from my Duluth presentation, I expressed
my opinion about Chauncey.

Jack

I guess Chauncey's eagerness to convince people that he was the old tramp is a red flag for me. I tend to believe the opposite of what spooks say.

Jack White Wrote:

Myra Bronstein Wrote:

Jack White Wrote:In another slide from my Duluth presentation, I expressed
my opinion about Chauncey.

Jack

I guess Chauncey's eagerness to convince people that he was the old tramp is a red flag for me. I tend to believe the opposite of what spooks say.

Thanks, Myra. Give us your opinion of this.

Jack

Myra Bronstein Wrote:

Jack White Wrote:

Myra Bronstein Wrote:

Jack White Wrote:In another slide from my Duluth presentation, I expressed
my opinion about Chauncey.

Jack

I guess Chauncey's eagerness to convince people that he was the old tramp is a red flag for me. I tend to believe the opposite of what spooks say.

Thanks, Myra. Give us your opinion of this.

Jack

I'm torn Jack because both Holt and Hunt so closely resemble the old tramp. Plus I have a high opinion of Lois Gibson's skills and she goes with Holt.

But I'm strongly leaning towards Hunt for a number of reasons. He does look more like the old tramp than Holt, who has a slightly more masculine less droopy face. Hunt's chin is a better match. Hunt favored disguises and the old tramp is really the only one wearing a disguise. And of course he liked hats and is the only one in a hat. Also didn't Mark Lane convince a jury that Hunt was in Dallas 11/21/63--the day before the assassination? A jury places him near the scene of the crime. Furthermore, since Hunt was involved in Watergate and since Watergate likely had a Dallas cover-up component, there's a link there albeit a tenuous one.

Jack White Wrote:Consider that the Holt photo is 1990s and the Hunt photo is 1960s...
and consider that Holt appears YOUNGER in 1990 than the tramp
did in 1960s.

As for Gibson...her studies are NWAS.

Look at the comparison she used to decide that Rogers was Frenchy!

Jack

Myra Bronstein Wrote:

Jack White Wrote:Consider that the Holt photo is 1990s and the Hunt photo is 1960s...
and consider that Holt appears YOUNGER in 1990 than the tramp
did in 1960s.

As for Gibson...her studies are NWAS.

Look at the comparison she used to decide that Rogers was Frenchy!

Jack

NWAS? What's NWAS?

James H. Fetzer Wrote:I don't know why Allan cites note 43, when I find it supported by note 42.

12-21-2009, 09:23 PM
James H. Fetzer
Member

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 35
Familiar Faces in Dealey Plaza, page 7 . . .
http://www.jfkresearch.com/eaglesham/page7.jpg

The key paragraph reads, "In the Altgens picture showing the limousine
turning onto Houston Street, standing close to the man resembling Mr.
Hemming, is someone who looked like Lucien Conein.

Photos: A face in the crowd; L. Conein; L. Conein in 1963; Composite

When we wrote to Col. Prouty about this, he responded [42], ". . . I
noted this same photo you have found and the likeness between that
person and Lou . . . I'd say that the guy is Conein." Although later in
the letter he stated, "I make no solid claim for Conein in the Dealey
Plaza picture," he went on to say, "but I do know that many of the
Vietnam-trained, Mongoose inner circle were there."

So I suppose you could say that he made an identification of Mainman
as Lucien Conein, but qualified it as "non-solid" or tentative and fallible.
I take that to mean that he thinks that it is Conein as his first response,
but he is wants to acknowledge that, in this case, he could be mistaken.

[42] L. Fletcher Prouty, written communication, May 7, 1996

My take is that he identified Mainmain as Conein, but then qualified it.

Since Jack has demonstrated multiple respects in which Adams is NOT
a "dead ringer" for Mainman, it is simply abusive for Allan to make that
claim here. He has not even discussed, much less rebutted, Jack's proofs.

Bernice Moore Wrote:DAWN..THERE ARE OTHERS...