Phil Dragoo Wrote:Jim

How blew out the president's brain from the rear if not a shot from the front

Finck, who ordered you not to transect the throat wound

Tere's hno statute of limitations on the murder of peace

The serial killer is still at large

Armed and dangerous

Jim Hackett II Wrote:[quote=Phil Dragoo]Jim



Dr. Finck is known to be corrupted before he faced the bar in Jim Garrison's case against Clay Shaw, but Big Jim and his staff didn't know that at that time in 1969.

Just the efforts expended against the truth over the decades is proof of guilty conduct in the contrived cover-up isn't it? Circumstantial evidence if nothing else.

From Mr. Marchetti we know that concern about aborting the Clay Shaw trial went to the upper levels of command authority of the Langley Criminal Gang of the CIA.

From day One the cover-up closed around the entire affair and continues today. Mr. Specter was replaced by Pose-ner and the circus rolls on. ...

Charles Drago Wrote:Disinformation agents often work in pairs.

Such is the case with "Betty Chruscielski" and "Albert Doyle."

For further enjoyment of the "Chruscielski"/"Doyle" tag-team, go to

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?10728-Was-there-a-body-swap-at-the-autopsy-at-Bethesda&p=61341#post61341

Further be advised that "Chruscielski" argues that JFK was shot by a gunman in the motorcade's lead car and that Greer fired the head shot.

I share with you the following observations which I made on June 6, 2011:

The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.

Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?

In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.

Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.

But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.

If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.

Betty Chruscielski Wrote:Charles, Since I joined this forum I have grown. I no longer believe that Kennedy was shot by the driver. I do believe that something was shot out the back window of the lead car, but I've said this before but you refuse to listen. I did listen to a talk you gave at the 1999 JFK conference. You were saying how we all need to unite in one theory and not have our own pet theories. I do not understand this point of view. I was taught that a person brings their argument and supportive facts and then presents them. We do not name call or character assassinate. You have said there were multiple shooters. I would love to read your argument that their were. Please let me know where I can read argument and I will. Betty

Jim Hackett II Wrote:Greg Burnham
Greg makes great presentations. Whupped up on Paul McAdams Nolan in debate .... ran the turd to silence on radio. Why does he do that which he (Nolan-McAdams) does?

Did one helluva a job in 2000 Conference in SoCal.

And Or:

Oliver Stone,
His Showtime "docu-series" Untold History of the U. S." is pretty good and positively holds a DP view of 20th and 21st Century history.

Jim

As an aside about the books and theft of intellectual properties issue. I just replaced Jim Garrison's "A Heritage of Stone" from Amazon. I paid a price 6 times the price on the dust jacket for 1970 dollars. I am not displeased.
It is a powerful book and I am glad to have it.

However I, even if I could, would not give a couple of hundred dollars for other books no matter how much I value the original author and works.

Penn Jones Jr. is one of four heroes to me and I dearly wish his original works were available at a lower cost so I too could enjoy FMG again. I spent a lot of time filling out the missing issues from the Baylor archives of "The Continuing Inquiry", but that is legal.

I am not endorsing the thefts, I am raising a bitch about prices for the 99% and or those living on fixed income far below the "federal poverty level".

It is a decision forcing one to examine the internal moral compass and make a choice. Does the fact of FMG being near impossible to find and impossible to find at reasonable cost make it proper to pursue the free downloads? I doubt it.
But I'd be lying if I did not admit temptation.