![]() |
|
JFK: What we know now that we didn't know then - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: JFK: What we know now that we didn't know then (/thread-8338.html) |
JFK: What we know now that we didn't know then - Charles Drago - 20-12-2011 I felt just fine then. And no, Adele, "each to his own" is an unacceptable resolution to arguments over fact. We are at war. It is not my opinion that JFK was assassinated by conspirators. Criminal conspiracy in the assassination of JFK is fact. We can go from there. JFK: What we know now that we didn't know then - LR Trotter - 20-12-2011 Along with JFK, none of the next four US Presidents served a full two terms. LBJ declined to be nominated for a second full term, candidate RFK was murdered while seeking the '68 Democratic nomination for the office, Republican candidate RMN was elected to two terms, but left office after the Watergate scandal during his second term, and after serving a partial term, appointed President Gerald Ford was not re-elected, and Jimmy Carter lost his re-election bid to serve a second term, losing to Ronald Reagan who served two full terms. So for twenty years, between the Eisenhower and Reagan administrations, the only US President elected to a second term was RMN, who resigned from office. Significant? I will forever wonder. JFK: What we know now that we didn't know then - Ed Jewett - 20-12-2011 Surely some computer scientist who is facile with a range of software products can find or design a process in which the key players (commenters, searchers, researchers, and the previously-published-on-the-topic) can use with ease to stipulate understandings, acceptance, acknowledgement on points of evidence, fact, and perhaps even nuance or analytical meaning, as well as for simpler use in terms of cross-referencing hypothesis x or thesis y or dramatic treatment #118. After almost 50 years, there has to be a more functional way to boil down all the minutiae in a way that can turn sap into syrup. |