![]() |
|
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Seminal Moments of Justice (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! (/thread-5033.html) |
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Magda Hassan - 24-08-2012 [ATTACH=CONFIG]3955[/ATTACH] Secret doc shows police to arrest Assange even if "dip immunity, in dip bag, as a dip bag, in dip vehicle - ARRESTED" Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Peter Lemkin - 24-08-2012 Magda Hassan Wrote:[ATTACH=CONFIG]3955[/ATTACH] Well, don't keep it obscured from our vision! It would not the least surprise me, given all of the sanctioned abductions, renditions, 'terminations with extreme prejudice', and black ops and lies - that such a document or 'order' stands in place. Sadly, however, once Assange is in U SS A hands, he is finished and nothing can save him. It is such a lawless and immoral World these days....yet hidden by PR firms and Propaganda as 'everything is just OK'.... :loco:
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Magda Hassan - 24-08-2012 Statement on U.K. intentions and pressures prior to Ecuadorian embassy siegeThursday 24th August, 01:00 BSTFormal statement by Craig Murray former U.K. Ambassador and career diplomat, August 23, 2012, on the Ecuadorian embassy siege in London.My name is Craig John Murray. I am a retired British diplomat. I was a member of Her Majesty's Diplomatic Service for over 20 years, and a member of the Senior Management Structure of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for over six years. As anybody who works a long time in any one organisation, I have a great many friends there, some of whom are now very senior officials. And as is natural, they sometimes discuss matters with their old colleague. I arrived in the UK from a trip abroad on 15 August 2012 and was immediately contacted by a very senior official within the Foreign and Commonwealth Office who was very concerned. He had knowledge that an attempt by the British authorities to force entry to the Embassy of Ecuador was possibly imminent. I suggested that this must be impossible, and he said that unfortunately it was not. He said that he had been party to formal discussions over a three week period between different British government departments on the legality of such a move. It had concluded that the provisions of the Diplomatic Premises Act of 1987 gave the authorities the domestic power to do this, in spite of the Vienna Convention of 1961. My ex-colleague went on to say that he understood the government intended to act quickly to pre-empt any grant of political asylum to Mr Assange by the government of Ecuador. If there were any formal international recognition of Mr Assange as a political refugee, it might complicate matters. He also said there was tremendous discomfort at this development within the British diplomatic service because of the potential exposure of British embassies and diplomats abroad to similar action. I asked how on earth such an illegal decision could have been reached. My ex-colleague said that political pressure exerted by the administration of the United States of America on Mr William Hague and Mr David Cameron had outweighed the views of British diplomats. I published a brief account of this conversation on my blog the following morning, in an effort to add to the pressures which might avert the government from such an illegal act. About Craig Murray: http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/about-craig-murray/ Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Jan Klimkowski - 24-08-2012 Magda Hassan Wrote:I arrived in the UK from a trip abroad on 15 August 2012 and was immediately contacted by a very senior official within the Foreign and Commonwealth Office who was very concerned. He had knowledge that an attempt by the British authorities to force entry to the Embassy of Ecuador was possibly imminent. I suggested that this must be impossible, and he said that unfortunately it was not. He said that he had been party to formal discussions over a three week period between different British government departments on the legality of such a move. It had concluded that the provisions of the Diplomatic Premises Act of 1987 gave the authorities the domestic power to do this, in spite of the Vienna Convention of 1961. All very well, and Craig Murray generally seems a man of integrity. However, what I'm hearing from Murray's diplomatic mates is pure self-interest. They're worried that they may become vulnerable to other states using any British action to seize Assange from an embassy as a legal precedent. In other words, they care about their sorry asses. Not about principles. Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Magda Hassan - 28-08-2012 The following anonymous essay has been posted as a comment on numerous websites about the WikiLeaks matter: A WikiLeaks Primer Originally, WikiLeaks' Julian Assange fled Iceland as he was under surveillance by business-suited strangers, plus he was tipped off by the bank where the WikiLeaks' account was located that they had been approached by US government personnel. In Sweden, Assange was immediately approached by a Bonnier family publication for exclusive rights in publishing WikiLeaked documents. Assange declined their offer, both against the principle of exclusivity, and because he'd been advised that the publication was similar to Rupert Murdoch's British tabloids; not necessarily respectable. It is important to understand that the Bonnier family is a major European media family (Bonnier AB is one of the 10 largest media companies in the world), who's ownership extends to American publications such as Sports Illustrated, Popular Science, Time, etc. [See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnier_Group and alsohttp://www.bonnier.com/about-us/] The woman who first approached Assange for consensual sex, Anna Ardin, worked for one of the Bonnier family publications, and while her present source of income is difficult to determine, she appears to be surviving nicely. Ardin would later approach the second young lady, Sofia Wilen (who also had consensual sex with Assange), to accompany her to the police. The law firm which volunteered to represent the two women is comprised of two law partners, Claes Borgstrom, who has two sisters who work for Bonnier family companies, and Thomas Bodstrom, who publishes through the Bonnier family media company (he writes legal fiction). Bodstrom was also the Swedish Minister of Justice who had OK'ed the CIA's illegal kidnapping of several Swedish citizens of Arabic origin --- also called extreme rendition --- who were transported to Egypt for torture (and what could have led to murder), but were eventually released and sued the Swedish government in Swedish courts, winning a financial judgment against them. Sweden claims it would never allow extradition to any country with a legalized death penalty, yet by allowing extreme renditions to such countries, we know this to be a lie. Originally when the women approached the police, a junior prosecutor on duty ordered Assange to remain in Sweden, but the Swedish Prosecution Authority shortly dropped all charges as they had no merit. Later, after allowing Assange to leave Sweden, and due to political pressure from the highest levels of government, the Swedish Prosecution Authority resumed the case without merit, seeking Assange's extradition, solely for questioning, in violation of both existing Swedish law, and the regulations pertaining to issuing European Union arrest warrants (two very important points!). During those early events in Sweden, Anna Ardin had chat message traffic with reporters for a Bonnier family tabloid, Expressen, which indicated criminal conspiracy and malfeasance on her part, and while her attorney, Claes Borgstrom, illegally directed her to delete this evidence, she forgot to delete the copy from her blog site, later downloaded by an enterprising Australian journalist. Unfortunately, this has received scant attention or reportage in the corporate media. Later, the other law partner and former Justice Minister, Thomas Bodstrom, went on a book tour in America, where he routinely spread disinformation about the WikiLeaks/Assange case. Much of the time Bodstrom stayed at a residence in Virginia, a short drive from the CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia. A curious coincidence, or logistical necessity? The present Justice Minister, Beatrice Ask, who resurrected the extradition case against Assange, was originally appointed to her cabinet positions by Carl Bildt, the former Swedish prime minister who is presently the Swedish foreign minister. Carl Bildt appears unfavorably mentioned in several WikiLeaked cables, and was a director at Lundin Petroleum during their involvement in massacres of Sudanese living on oil-rich land in that African country. Later, in America, a relatively unknown author named Jaclyn Friedman, would attempt to publicize the consensual sex case against Assange as rape charges. Friedman's web site, at that time, displays her boasting of enjoying sex with multiple male partners in a given week's time, although at times Ms. Friedman claims to be an avowed lesbian? Perhaps more troubling is that Ms. Friedman was published through Perseus Books, which at that time was owned by the private equity firm, Perseus LLC, which was also listed as the business address, for tax purposes, for the American Friends of Bilderberg, Inc., whose directors are listed as David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and Richard Perle. The business contact for that group at Perseus LLC and either the firm's CEO or a senior executive, was James Johnson, a major character featured in a recent book by NY Times financial reporter, Gretchen Morgenstern, cited as playing a major governmental role in the subprime mortgage meltdown. A Bonnier family member, Elisabet Borsiin Bonnier, was and still may be the Swedish ambassador to Israel. Quite a bunch of improbable connections pertaining to a strange case of consensual sex? Quote:Bonnier Group Quote:Journalists 'probing Lundin Oil': report In June 2010 ECOS (European Coalition on Oil in Sudan), an umbrella group of European organisations, including about 50 NGOs, published a report called "Unpaid Debt", urging Sweden, Austria and Malaysia to probe whether Lundin Petroleum (then Lundin Oil), in consortium with Petronas and OMV, had broken international law between 1997 and 2003. By launching oil exploration in such an unstable region, the consortium set the wheels in motion for a power struggle that had led to numerous crimes, including widespread "killing of civilians, rape of women, abduction of children, torture and forced displacements," the report claimed. Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt was on the board of directors of Lundin Petroleum at the time. Hat tip to Linda Minor. Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Peter Lemkin - 28-08-2012 VERY interesting, and I think IMPORTANT!......now we have some peek at the intermediary black operatives in this sordid matter! There are others, some I know of, some I'm sure exist but I have no knowledge of. Today Al Jazeera is running a fairly, if incomplete, story on how JA is being portrayed in Sweden. Of course it is all 'white ops'...no Black or Deep Political Ops.
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Magda Hassan - 30-08-2012 Covert police unit with links to armed ops to infiltrate supporters outside Ecuador EmbassyPOSTED BY ANONYMOUS ⋅ AUGUST 25, 2012 ⋅ 12 COMMENTSFILED UNDER ASSANGE Darker Net can confirm that officers specialising in infiltration and undercover operations and who liaise with armed units, may already be amongst those policing the Ecuador Embassy in London. A press photographer captured notes (see photo) held by a uniformed police officer on duty outside the embassy, revealing that SS10, otherwise known as Specialist Crime Directorate 10 and formerly SO10, are being deployed. The notes ominously refer to possible "risk of life". The role of SS10 is Intelligence-gathering. SS10 were involved in the events that led to the murder of Brazilian national, Jean de Menezes, in south London and who had been wrongly identified as a terrorist. SS10 are also the branch that employed Mark Kennedy (aka Stone) who infiltrated several protest groups and who is now working for Densus, a private surveillance company in the USA. Below, we present some more background on these two infamous SS10-led operations.First… The notes carried by the police officer outside the embassy said that Julian Assange should be taken even if he emerges in a vehicle, under diplomatic immunity or in a diplomatic bag, which may involve "risk to life". They add that there had been speculation that Mr. Assange could be smuggled out of the building in a parcel or given a post in the United Nations by Ecuador in an attempt to evade arrest. The operational guidance, marked "restricted", also warned of the "possibility of distraction", suggesting that Scotland Yard feared Mr Assange's supporters could try to create a commotion outside the embassy, providing cover under which he could flee. Further details of the notes, which were obscured by the officer holding them, appeared to relate to the "everyday business" of the embassy and the possible need for "additional support" from SS10. Scotland Yard later said it did not know what this referred to. It's interesting to note, too, S020, the Met's counter-terrorism protective security command, is written near the bottom right-hand corner of the document.SS10 ops1. The killing of Jean Charles de MenezesIn 2005, police from SO10, now SS10, were involved in the surveillance operation of Jean Charles de Menezes, a Brazilian national, that led directly to his murder at Stockwell Underground station by officers of SO19, the Armed response Unit. It was a case of mistaken identity. Two officers from SO19 fired a total of eleven shots, according to the number of empty shell casings found on the floor of the train afterwards. Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder at close range, and died at the scene. An eyewitness later said that the eleven shots were fired over a thirty second period, at three second intervals. It is believed that at least one member of the elite Special Reconnaissance Regiment was present at the shooting. Note: in the resulting inquiry into the murder, Gareth Peirce, who is the lawyer acting for Julian Assange, was one of two lawyers representing the Menezes family. For more, see here.2. Mark KennedyMark Kennedy worked for SO10 (now SS10) and was involved in several undercover ops, the most celebrated of which involved environmental activists who were opposed to coal-fired power stations. The activists had stopped a train conveying coal to the Drax power station in 2008. Kennedy had infiltrated the group and assisted them with reconnaissance and also drove them to a rendezvous. For more on what happened, see here. See here too for what happened eventually to the activists and how Kennedy and his operations were discredited. Note: Kennedy/Stone is now working for Densus in the USA, which is a surveillance company that spies on Occupy protesters and other protests groups.Posted from the darker net via Android.http://darkernet.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/covert-police-unit-with-links-to-armed-ops-to-infiltrate-supporters-outside-ecuador-embassy/
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Peter Lemkin - 30-08-2012 Now we are entering interesting and dangerous territory, if the above is true!!!! Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Magda Hassan - 02-09-2012 Sweden's Other Rape Suspects CommentsNEW YORK It is difficult for me, as an advocate against rape and other forms of violence against women, to fathom the laziness and willful ignorance that characterize so much of the media coverage of the sexual-assault allegations against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. To report that we are simply witnessing Swedish justice at work, one must be committed to doing no research not even the bare minimum of picking up a phone. In fact, we are witnessing a bizarre aberration in the context of Sweden's treatment of sex crime a case that exposes the grim reality of indifference, or worse, that victims there and elsewhere face. If I were raped in Uppsala, where Assange is alleged to have committed his crime, I could not expect top prosecutors to lobby governments to arrest my assailant. On the contrary, "ordinary" Swedish rapists and abusers of women should assume that the police might not respond when called. When I tried the rape-crisis hotline at the government-run Crisis Center for Women in Stockholm, no one even picked up and there was no answering machine. CommentsAccording to rape-crisis advocates in Sweden, one-third of Swedish women have been sexually assaulted by the time they leave their teens. Indeed, according to a study published in 2003, and other later studies through 2009, Sweden has the highest sexual-assault rate in Europe, and among the lowest conviction rates. CommentsWhen I reached the Stockholm branch of Terrafem, a support organization for rape survivors, a volunteer told me that in her many years of experience, Sweden's police, prosecutors, and magistrates had never mobilized in pursuit of any alleged perpetrator in ways remotely similar to their pursuit of Assange. The far more common scenario in fact, the only reliable scenario was that even cases accompanied by a significant amount of evidence were seldom prosecuted. CommentsThis, she explained, was because most rapes in Uppsala, Stockholm, and other cities occur when young women meet young men online and go to an apartment, where, as in the allegations in the Assange case, what began as consensual sex turns nonconsensual. But she said that this is exactly the scenario that Swedish police typically refuse to prosecute. Just as everywhere else, Sweden's male-dominated police, she explained, do not tend to see these victims as "innocent," and thus do not bother building a case for arrest. CommentsShe is right: According to a report by Amnesty International, as of 2008, the number of reported rapes in Sweden had quadrupled in 20 years, but only 20% of cases were ever prosecuted. And, while the prosecution rate constituted a minimal improvement on previous years, when less than 15% of cases ended up in court, the conviction rate for reported rapes "is markedly lower today than it was in 1965." As a result, "in practice, many perpetrators enjoy impunity." CommentsUntil 2006, women in Uppsala faced a remarkable hurdle in seeking justice: the city's chief of police, Göran Lindberg, was himself a serial rapist, convicted in July 2010 of more than a dozen charges, including "serious sexual offenses." One victim testified that she was told her rapist was the police chief, and that she would be framed if she told anyone about his assaults. Lindberg also served as the Police Academy's spokesman against sexual violence. The Uppsala police force that is now investigating Assange either failed to or refused to investigate effectively the sadistic rapist with whom they worked every day. CommentsIn other words, the purported magical Swedish kingdom of female sexual equality, empowerment, and robust institutional support for rape victims a land, conjured by Swedish prosecutors, that holds much of the global media in thrall simply does not exist. CommentsIn the Assange case, the Swedish police supported the accusers in legally unprecedented ways for example, by allowing them to tell their stories together and by allowing testimony from a boyfriend.But other alleged victims of gender-based abuse, sometimes in life-threatening circumstances, typically receive very different treatment.In particular, according toWAVE, a pan-European consortium of service providers for rape and sexual-abuse survivors, when migrants, who comprise 13.8% of Sweden's population, report rape and abuse, they face high systemic hurdles in even telling their stories to police including longstanding linguistic barriers in communicating with them at all. CommentsLikewise, Swedish intake centers for victims of male violence are woefully underfunded like all support services for rape and abuse victims across Europe and North America leaving many women who face threats to their safety and that of their children waiting for unavailable places in shelters. When I emailed the Rape Crisis support institute in Uppsala, listed by the global rape-crisis organization RAINN, I received an automatic reply saying that the facility was temporarily closed. CommentsSo, for most raped Swedish women, the shelters are full, the hotlines inactive, and the police selectively look the other way that is, unless they are busy chasing down a globally famous suspect. CommentsWe have been here before. Last year, when my left-wing colleagues were virtually unanimous in believing the New York Police Department's narrative of a certain victim and a guilty-before-due-process rapist, I made the same call to the local rape-crisis center. There, Harriet Lesser, who works every day with victims whose alleged attacker is not the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, confirmed that the official support shown for the victim in advance of any investigation was indeed unprecedented. CommentsLet me be clear: I am not saying that Assange, much less Dominique Strauss-Kahn, committed no crime against women. Rather, Assange's case, as was true with Strauss-Kahn's, is being handled so differently from how the authorities handle all other rape cases that a corrupted standard of justice clearly is being applied. These aberrations add insult to the injury of women, undefended and without justice, who have been raped in the "normal" course of events by violent nobodies. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/sweden-s-other-rape-suspects-by-naomi-wolf Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! - Peter Lemkin - 02-09-2012 The above piece would be funny, if the matter at hand [JA wanted in USA for 'terrorism'] was not so serious and lethal. Will it make the MSM...no. In the current prison that is the World, the real criminals are the guards - in more cases than not.:mexican: |