The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs (/thread-12618.html) |
The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Scott Kaiser - 26-05-2014 ^^Edited... The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Scott Kaiser - 26-05-2014 Jim DiEugenio Wrote:The following is from Destiny Betrayed, second edition, p. 47. I will denote what I wrote by not using quotation marks. I will denote what Dulles wrote by using quotation marks. Quote:In 1965, Dulles was preparing a magazine memoir about the Bay of Pigs. I believe that, that would have been the most interesting read if it only had been published, we than wouldn't be fighting for the rest of the Bay of Pigs volumes for their release. The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Jim DiEugenio - 26-05-2014 Your reply at number ten about me quoting my book is nothing but an evasion on your part. I was quoting Dulles and Bissell. As they were both quoted directly in Diplomatic History. The title of that article, which apparently you did not know about, was "The Confessions of Allen Dulles." And no objective person could say it was anything else. Again, here is Dulles: "We felt that when the chips were down...when the crisis arose in reality--any action required for success would be authorized rather than permit the enterprise to fail....We believed that in a time of crisis we would gain what we might have lost if we provoked an argument in advance." What do you think he is talking about when he says "any action required for success would be authorized rather than permit the enterprise to fail"? That is English isn't it? He is talking about the Bay of Pigs failing--as he knew it would. Then again, in English, "I have seen a good many operations which started out like this B of P insistence of complete secrecy--non-involvement of the U.S.--initial reluctance to authorize supporting action. This limitation tends to disappear as the needs of the operation become clarified." What else could be mean about "limitation tends to disappear as the needs of the operation become clarified" except JFK authorizing direct intervention? If you have an alternative to what everyone else thinks it says, then please offer it. But its pretty clear you were not even aware of this bombshell article. Which is what I would expect from a newbie. You did not answer my question about DeTorres. Why? The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Tracy Riddle - 26-05-2014 If Nixon had won the election, was he already intending to send in the US military to aid the invasion? Aiding the Cuban invaders stuck on the beach could be the excuse for US intervention (plus the usual excuses of "national security," "American interests," etc). And wasn't there another half-assed attempt to kill Castro before the invasion, in the hope that it would spread confusion and hurt Cuban morale? The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Drew Phipps - 26-05-2014 It sounds like Dulles is saying he didn't care whether the Cubans succeeded or not. Not that the plan was designed to fail, but that the plan allowed for the Cubans to die on that beach, if it justified the next move. So it was a win-win for Dulles and a lose-lose for JFK (who had promised not to intervene directly) What is the expression: "Forgiveness is easier to obtain than permission"? The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Scott Kaiser - 26-05-2014 Quote:Jim, Forgive me for my fast typing and typo errors made, I've made the corrections in bold and italicized lettering so those corrections can be easily found. The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Scott Kaiser - 26-05-2014 Jim, please don't get me wrong, I do not entirely disagree with everything you say, I do agree with what you said about Hunt and Morales, perhaps, it's the reason my father was killed over the photos he had of them, and yes. I too agree with you that the blundered up Bay of Pigs only instigated the CIA to finally get rid of their nemesis Kennedy before he tore them up into a thousand pieces. Again, that's just. My two cents. The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Kenneth Kapel - 26-05-2014 My 2 cents, for whatever they are worth, is that after JFK became President the CIA's hign command did decide to fabe defeated at The Bay of Pigs, in order to show the President who is really in charge, and that he had better play ball with the establishments plans for the nation & the world. If he went alone he would have a successful, at least from the establishments point of view, if not watch out. JFK didn't play ball so Dallas was inevitable. When Ronald Reagan was shot my initial reaction was that if Reagan survived the attempted assassination the powers that be were telling him he had better just watch this old movies at Camp David and let George run things. Just two of my crazy opinions. The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Scott Kaiser - 26-05-2014 The bells about to rock FIRE we salute you! A few changes have been made in my previous post above, apologizes for the typo's made. Changes have been made in bold and initialized lettering. The truth and bare facts about the Bay of Pigs - Jim DiEugenio - 26-05-2014 1.) After Kennedy vetoed the first plan because it was too much like a WW 2 operation, the CIA came back with five different landing points. They strongly recommended Playa Giron. First, it was the only one with an area suitable with an air strip. Further, they lied to JFK and told him it had been the scene of much resistance fighting for a long time. (Kornbluh, Bay of Pigs Declassified, p. 126) How you can say that this was JFK's choice under those circumstances eludes me. 2.) I guess you and I have a difference of opinion about what constitutes a beachhead. In military terms this means your side has captured a point on the beach that they have secured to the point that they can 1.) Fend off attacks and 2.) Safely land troops and munitions. To the point that they can now launch a counterattack and break out operation. Now, if you have read the Kirkpatrick Report, at no point in the operation was this status ever remotely achieved. The exiles were on the defensive almost from the beginning. Because within hours of landing Castro had more men, more weapons, and better air power at the front. This was worsened by the fact that two resupply ships had sunk in the bay. (ibid, p. 310) In fact, because of the constant tank shelling at the beach, the resupply ships that were left retreated to fifty miles into the bay. (ibid, pgs. 312-15) Within 24 hours, the writing was on the wall. (ibid, p. 313) 3.) It was not the NY TImes that was the tip off point for Fidel. Castro had plants inside the training camps in Guatemala. And they alerted him as to when the last ship had departed. Then, the CIA told JFK that there would be no patrol at Playa Giron. But there was.(ibid, p. 126, 307) And they alerted him to the preliminary landings. As per Tracy, I do not know if the American intervention was actually a part of the plan under Nixon. But I find FLetcher Prouty's observations about this interesting. First, he said Nixon was the action officer in the WH on the operation. Which to me would connote that they thought he would be the next president and would therefore supervise the actual operation. Second, Prouty said that the guys running the thing were shocked that Kennedy won. SInce they knew since it was not his operation he would have to be dragged into it. |