+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Reopen kennedy case forum (/thread-12782.html)
Pages:
1
2
Reopen kennedy case forum - Albert Doyle - 28-06-2014
Quote:Albert Doyle has only this morning tried to place the label of CT on me. I am not. Will not. Ever be a CT. So Albert Doyle can shove his Operation Mockingbird label up his arse. If ever you wanted to see how disinformation agents work we have had a clear example from Bob the Bullshitter and Albert Doyle over the last few days.
Doyle thinks sane people want to tear their hair out when debating him because he has all the facts. In actual fact, it is because he is not all he tries to portray and takes you around in circles with complete nonsense. Everyone here knows how calm and collected Greg Parker is when dealing with morons. Even Greg lost it with this clown and wrote one of the most scathing things to Doyle that I have ever seen Greg write on a public forum. Such is the nature of Albert Doyle. Paul Trejo has got nothing on AD.
Pricks on a tether, hang together...
If this is Farley he just admitted he's not a CT-er. Since you are either a Lone Nutter or Factualist in this war I think Farley just admitted what he truly is. Good, that was a quick win. Truth is Farley quit when it became too obvious that Yates passed a lie detector test and was shown to have told Dempsey Jones critical information prior to the assassination. Farley uses the Lone Nutter tactic of questioning the truth of every single claim as if he was practicing a higher level of scrutiny, but it's painfully obvious he's doing that in order to deny the obvious. It's just wrongfully-applied gratuitous doubt trying to sound credible. Persons with a more credible understanding of the assassination and its wicked corruption would show more fear in attacking Yates. I find it funny that those Reopen The Kennedy Case forum members object to Prudhomme so much while ignoring the fact Farley backs the FBI and their statements in the Yates case without question. Damned right he's no CT-er. It's funny that those guys claim they have a very low bs tolerance yet then allow Farley to claim the bloody and murderous FBI were the poor victims of lying hoaxer Ralph Yates who they were then forced to murder in a mental institution. Maybe we should send FBI sympathy cards and flowers Lee. Talk about having no sense at all.
Farley claimed he was going to retreat and do more research and get back to us. He never did. Tell Hasan Yusef this debate was already done. It separates the corner boy punks from the men:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?11329-Ralph-Yates#.U68HXZu9Fxk
Reopen kennedy case forum - Bob Prudhomme - 28-06-2014
It gets even more comical, Albert. I see now Farley has exposed me as an undercover closet LN disinfo agent, and that all the debates I've had with David von Pein actually prove the two of us are in cahoots. :
:
Reopen kennedy case forum - Drew Phipps - 28-06-2014
I'm not trying to inject myself into an argument here, but what's "CT-er" mean? What's "Factualist" mean?
Ok, here I am trying to inject myself into the argument: Bob P.'s research on ballistics and forensics is some of the clearest and most sensible work on JFK that I've come across in decades of reading. Furthermore, his ballistics and forensics work is consistent with, and expands on, work done by the pioneers from the 60's and 70's. I may not agree with all his conclusions and theories, but I'm sure that his work is rational and considered.
Albert, my opinion, I don't agree with many of your conclusions. But you're intelligent. And you don't need to use profanity or be insulting to make your point, so that makes you more of a convincing and interesting person to discuss controversial stuff with, than those that have to resort to same.
You two guys could do me a favor by not bringing the BS from this other forum into this polite and rational group. It's just not worth it.
Reopen kennedy case forum - Lauren Johnson - 28-06-2014
Drew Phipps Wrote:I'm not trying to inject myself into an argument here, but what's "CT-er" mean? What's "Factualist" mean?
Ok, here I am trying to inject myself into the argument: Bob P.'s research on ballistics and forensics is some of the clearest and most sensible work on JFK that I've come across in decades of reading. Furthermore, his ballistics and forensics work is consistent with, and expands on, work done by the pioneers from the 60's and 70's. I may not agree with all his conclusions and theories, but I'm sure that his work is rational and considered.
Albert, my opinion, I don't agree with many of your conclusions. But you're intelligent. And you don't need to use profanity or be insulting to make your point, so that makes you more of a convincing and interesting person to discuss controversial stuff with, than those that have to resort to same.
You two guys could do me a favor by not bringing the BS from this other forum into this polite and rational group. It's just not worth it.
The usual binary is a Conspiracy Theorist (CT) vs. the Lone Nutter (LN). A Factualist is a different version of CT -- more positive, I would guess.
Actually, most of this thread has to with what is going on in another Forum and is therefore technically out of bounds. It has been kinda fun, tho. ::hobbyhorse::
Reopen kennedy case forum - Dawn Meredith - 28-06-2014
I could not get the forum to open. It just spun as if it was about to open but did not so I gave up. The name is familiar. Whose forum is it?
Dawn
Reopen kennedy case forum - Dawn Meredith - 28-06-2014
Dawn Meredith Wrote:I could not get the forum to open. It just spun as if it was about to open but did not so I gave up. The name is familiar. Whose forum is it?
Dawn
Oh if it's Greg Parker's forum you can't read it unless you 're a member.
We don't allow name calling here. Attack the idea not the person.