+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? (/thread-13364.html)
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - David Guyatt - 28-11-2014
I'm still trying to get my head around the question where did the rubble go. The twin towers amounted to, I understand, 1.2 million tons. They were they world largest office blocks with what, 50,000/60,000 office workers based there? That's 50/60,000 desks, telephone, computer stations, thousand of boardroom tables, kitchen equipment etc - not counting the vast array of steel struts that were the bones of both buildings. One fireman who survived the collapse asks the question. He said (it's in the above clip) where were the desks and phones? He was completely bemused that there were none that he could see as he made his way out of the remains.
Can anyone explain this?
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - Peter Lemkin - 28-11-2014
David Guyatt Wrote:I'm still trying to get my head around the question where did the rubble go. The twin towers amounted to, I understand, 1.2 million tons. They were they world largest office blocks with what, 50,000/60,000 office workers based there? That's 50/60,000 desks, telephone, computer stations, thousand of boardroom tables, kitchen equipment etc - not counting the vast array of steel struts that were the bones of both buildings. One fireman who survived the collapse asks the question. He said (it's in the above clip) where were the desks and phones? He was completely bemused that there were none that he could see as he made his way out of the remains.
Can anyone explain this?
It defies explanation using the 'official' bullshit model! ONLY with a HUGE additional energy source other than the pitifully small fires from the planes and gravitational energy, can one explain any of the observed phenomenon. Explosives, such as nanothermite/ate and/or beamed weaponry (or other exotics) could have supplied the extra needed energy - pancaking can NOT - not even come close! A person who worked for months on the rubble pile said the largest piece of anything from an office found was a one-and-a-half inch wide piece of a desk phone. Only one small piece of the hundreds of thousands of steel file cabinets was found - as I remember it had been melted almost beyond recognition but with some paper hanging folders unburned......ah, but some of the hijacker's passports and headbands were found intact...not to worry!:
tampfeet::Dr. Wood's website with many interesting photos - often not covered by other 911 researchers is here http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/
None [!] of the photos below [and the phenomenon they capture] can be explained by the 'official mythology' of how things happened on 911 - and I chose only a few of thousands].
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - Tracy Riddle - 28-11-2014
I have no doubt that the Pentagon and others have secret weapons we haven't heard about yet. Remember how the fires kept burning in the sub-basements for weeks? Despite the water being poured on them, the days of rain. A lot of unusual energy was at work there.
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - David Guyatt - 29-11-2014
,
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - David Guyatt - 29-11-2014
More on WTC6 - for me an under reported aspect of 9/11. Note that the two steel girders next to the US Customs guy have been twisted and bent in conformity with the Hutchison Effect:
And:
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - Peter Lemkin - 29-11-2014
top view of WTC 6....hard to explain what 'giant' stepped on it....
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - R.K. Locke - 29-11-2014
In context:
![[Image: 640px-WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png/640px-WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png)
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - R.K. Locke - 29-11-2014
I really don't know how anyone could look at the picture above and not think "What the fuck?"
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - Dawn Meredith - 29-11-2014
David Guyatt Wrote:Thinking outside of the box should be a requirement for us all, and not something to be besmirched about. There's a lot in that Youtube clip I find provoking.
I have not watched the full video but watching the short one I again think "what caused these buildings to turn to dust?" Hard to believe Rummy in that clip. This "energy weapon" makes the most sense to me. Trying to figure out what brought the buildings down is to me akin to trying to guess how many shots or exactly where the shooters were in the Kennedy assassination. I go back to basics. That being we cannot say for certainty what DID happen, only what did not.
Dawn
Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon? - David Guyatt - 29-11-2014
Bending that massive steel I beam into a perfect horseshoe shape without cracking is another effect of the Hutchison effect.
The underground fires burning up to 8 weeks later with recorded temperatures between 1,500 - 2,500 degrees remains wholly inexplicable.