+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Deep-Politics-Forum)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-JFK-Assassination)
+--- Thread: Triple Moating of the political assassinations and just what that implies for respiration of truth (/Thread-Triple-Moating-of-the-political-assassinations-and-just-what-that-implies-for-respiration-of-truth)
Pages:
1
2
Triple Moating of the political assassinations and just what that implies for respiration of truth - Tom Scully - 17-09-2015
Bart Kamp Wrote:Jim "everything is fake" Fetzer 'died an academic death' 3 years ago, as he got kicked off here and at EF, he is a non-entity.
If anyone at Amazon swallows his rhetoric then good luck to them.
Bart,
Are you not a pot calling a kettle? You just know Wesley Frazier is a fake, "cover up" witness in the TSBD vestibule, but aside from Baker, Truly, Bill Shelley, how many other
"fake" witnesses fronting "fake" affidavits, and spewing "fake" testimony are required in support of your particular belief system? Or is your claim that they were turned into Charley
McCarthys, en masse, in fear for their very lives?
Unreasonable is unreasonable, no matter who pushes it.
At least when I question the reliability of the claims of Mrs. & Mrs. Gladys Johnson, Earline Roberts, and "war hero" William Whaley, I support my challenges with the inconsistencies in
their own claims. I raise the issues only after examining what is and is not supported in the records of their testimonies and evidence, vs. contradicting testimonies and presented evidence.
The Johnsons and Roberts exhibited no sense of accurate recall of the timing of events, crucial to their claims, and Gladys testified to first meeting Oswald when the government
claimed he was in Mexico City and she recalled that he wanted to room "close to his work," despite Osweald not being employed "about three weeks before" mid October. Whaley changed his D.O.B.
by two years, corrected Chief Justice Warren as to a barely relevant misdescription of Whaley's thirty plus years as a cabbie, and testified falsely to keeping his log's passenger pick up time in quarter hour
increments. Whaley's log entered into evidence contradicted this. Whaley claimed to be a recipient of the Navy Cross combat award, but where is any record of his award?
Fetzer seems to present no differently than anyone who concludes first and then attempts to fashion a set of circumstances and evidence to support a conclusion not arrived at in consideration of acquired
facts.