+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Deep-Politics-Forum)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-JFK-Assassination)
+--- Thread: Contrived Evidence (/Thread-Contrived-Evidence)
Pages:
1
2
Contrived Evidence - Albert Doyle - 15-02-2016
There's no excuse for no investigation into the man whose paycheck was found in the pocket of an alleged presidential assassin.
Contrived Evidence - Alan Ford - 15-02-2016
No excuse indeed, Mr. Doyle, unless, of course, failure to do so is part of the cover up.
Here, courtesy of MaryFerrell.org, is a conflicting report that suggests the pay stub wasn't found in the wrongfully accused's wallet, but instead, well, here take a look/read ----> http://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57760#relPageId=182
Wallet? or residence? as if the wrongfully accused ever actually lived there...lies here, lies there, lies everywhere. Bunch of lies...lie, lie, lie...Can these lying treasonous cowards ever make up their minds?!
Contrived Evidence - Drew Phipps - 16-02-2016
Here's the problem with the idea that the paystub was planted... It doesn't lead anywhere. Who or what is supposed to be framed by the paystub, and what theory is advanced, lone nut or CT? For that matter, what theory is made more likely by proving that the paystub is planted?
Contrived Evidence - Albert Doyle - 16-02-2016
How or why that paycheck ended up on a list of Oswald's possessions when arrested is beyond me.
Contrived Evidence - Tracy Riddle - 16-02-2016
Drew Phipps Wrote:Here's the problem with the idea that the paystub was planted... It doesn't lead anywhere. Who or what is supposed to be framed by the paystub, and what theory is advanced, lone nut or CT? For that matter, what theory is made more likely by proving that the paystub is planted?
Good questions. Unfortunately they apply to a lot of aspects of this case.
Contrived Evidence - Alan Ford - 17-02-2016
A good question indeed gentlemen...moments like this reminds us of actor Joe Pesci's portrayal of David Ferrie in Oliver Stone's JFK, trying to explain to Jim Garrison how even the shooters didn't know who ordered the president's demise, saying essentially, "It's A Mystery Wrapped in a Riddle Inside an Enigma".
Will the research community ever know why James Arthur Jackson's 39 month old pay stub was attributed to being in the possession of the wrongfully accused's wallet or in his former residence (choose whatever script officialdom wants to go with on any given day, and if you believe the wrongfully accused actually lived or visited anywhere officialdom implies there's a ski resort for sell in Honolulu).
While we are on this particular subject, please be aware that top shelf researcher Mr. LeDoux (Ed) has done some extraordinary work on how Mr. Jackson may fit into all of this, even to the point of locating his whereabouts and actually communicating with Mr. Jackson on a number of occasions. What I gathered from reading Mr. LeDoux's accounts of his exchanges with Mr. Jackson is I sense he is an innocent party void of any nefarious leanings in this pay stub caper.
These lying treasonous cowards already lied when they said the wrongfully accused fired a rifle upon the presidential limousine, so it isn't frivolous to believe these same sinister snakes had to find a creative way to connect the wrongfully accused to the Neely Street address somehow.
*Sidebar: Unable to link to Mr. LeDoux's exemplary research because the bookmarked material is saved elsewhere. One helluva job on that piece though.
Contrived Evidence - Alan Ford - 17-02-2016
Final thought today on this Neely Street business. I'm simply intrigued by all of this, and have been since coming across that odd pay stub in the wrongfully accused's possession per the DPD property-sheet. Why would a pay stub of a total stranger be in anyone's personal effects? Especially one that's rather dated (some 39 months hence of it's issuance) "found" on someone living on another continent altogether during the pay period in question. Strange I tell you.
Further reading today about James Arthur Jackson and the Neely Street residence in general brought me to an exchange between top shelf researchers Mr. Parker (Greg) and Mr. Scully (Tom), where both are seriously questioning whether or not the wrongfully accused even resided on Neely Street, with Mr. Parker citing credible evidence to the contrary, and Mr. Scully sharing the following insightful link as well ---->
http://neelyst.blogspot.com/
Amazing to what great lengths these lying treasonous cowards would go to finger an innocent party w/contrived evidence. $#%@ clowns!