+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 (/thread-15721.html)
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - Jim DiEugenio - 27-01-2018
David:
What is a landing card?
Also,what is that first document, the one under Secretaria de Gobernacion, is that from before the assassination?
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - David Josephs - 27-01-2018
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:David:
What is a landing card?
Also,what is that first document, the one under Secretaria de Gobernacion, is that from before the assassination?
I understand it is the copy given to Immigration of the FM tourist visa being used....
That doc is the 15 day tourist visa they say Oswald got on Sept 17. ...and proof to me Ruth typed that letter with full knowledge of the import of 15 days for sept 17....
As I see it, Gaudet had to be involved in securing that card in Oswalds name... His 1 day visit never happened and it was Gaudet, Banister and Ferris shoe were aware and involved with each other....
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - Jim DiEugenio - 27-01-2018
I think you better explain your last comments about the New Orleans visa.
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - David Josephs - 27-01-2018
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:I think you better explain your last comments about the New Orleans visa.
The Evidence was created after the fact. The Visa a key part.
Oswald had 15 days... But he really didn't . Had had much longer if need be.
His time in Mexico has to coincide with his time with the Cubans .
GAUDET was more helpful and involved than I think we know. I continue to compile my evidence....
Think about what that letter corroborates....
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - Jim DiEugenio - 28-01-2018
What is the giveaway that it was created after the fact?
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - David Josephs - 29-01-2018
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:What is the giveaway that it was created after the fact?
When the Tourist Visa is used to create the bi-monthly account of immigration, the FM-11, the names are alphabetized and entered in 15 day increments: 1st-15th & 16th-31st
In each case the man's name had been understood to be H. O. LEE. The FBI offers travel documents in that name and the VISA as well as Hotel registry are offered as "LEE, Harvey Oswald"
How would Mexican Immigration know the man's name was actually Oswald when the original FM-11 entry is:
enough so to put him alphabetically under "O" rather than "L" ?
There's a bit more to it including the stamps which we see on the card and the story behind those.... suffice to say, I don't think there are any authentic pieces of evidence related to Mexico City...
Now see my next post please
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - David Josephs - 29-01-2018
In the recent release we are given the operational summary reports from each of the tapping programs being run our of the MX CIA office: LIENVOY and LIFEAT
(Side note: as I go thru these docs, the mid to late Sept reports all show the spying programs in Mexico working very well and producing great info - how that stops on Sept 27th...)
Anyway, one would expect in a report written Oct 13th that there would be some mention of the crazy American who made these calls and was trying to hard to get to the USSR via Cuba...
We see the lines tapped include the ones "Oswald" used...
Is it too much to expect a mention of this highly unlikely event by the COS Win Scott given he'd just been given these transcripts....
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - David Josephs - 29-01-2018
Follow up
The October LEINVOY report mentions an English-speaking man talking with the Soviet Embassy after Oct 1....
We must remember that the initial call on Oct 1st was said to be to the Soviet Military attache.... not the Embassy
As I expected, the reality of there being an Oswald connection was created after the fact to but the FBI on the defensive...
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10211-10113.pdf
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - Jim DiEugenio - 30-01-2018
I really hope everyone understands how crucial this material is.
It makes me sick we had to wait for it for over a half century. And the MSM did not note it in that two week deluge in late October early November.
To me this stuff is crucial. As Dan Hardway said in an interview with David Giglio, it just might end up when everything is out there that the CIA made up an entire legend about Oswald being in Mexico City.
More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 - David Josephs - 30-01-2018
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:I really hope everyone understands how crucial this material is.
It makes me sick we had to wait for it for over a half century. And the MSM did not note it in that two week deluge in late October early November.
To me this stuff is crucial. As Dan Hardway said in an interview with David Giglio, it just might end up when everything is out there that the CIA made up an entire legend about Oswald being in Mexico City.
As Hoover writes in January 1964.... (below)
Angleton/Egerter > Phillips/Hunt > Goodpasture/Scott > Mystery Man & Alvarado....
----
What, if any, is the the strongest argument against the Odio sisters being wrong about our Oswald being at their door and in their home?
Mrs. ODIO. I kept saying it can't be to myself; it just can't be. I mean it couldn't be, but when my sister walked into the hospital and she said, "Sylvia, have you seen the man?" And I said, "Yes." And she said, "That was the man that was at the door of my house." So I had no doubts then.
Or why shouldn't we believe DURAN.... about the 28th...
CORNWELL - During this period was your normal work week, did it include Saturdays?
Tirado- Yes.
Cornwell - Is it possible that, in addition to his visits on Friday, he also came back the following day on Saturday morning?
TIRADO - No.
CORNWELL - How can you be sure of that?
TIRADO - Because, uh, I told you before, that it was easy to remember, because not all the Americans that came there were married with a Russian woman, they have live(d) in Russian and uh, we didn't used to fight with those people because if you, they came for going to Cuba, so apparently they were friends, no? So we were nice to them with this man we fight, I mean we had a hard discussion so we didn't want to have anything to do with him.
CORNWELL - Okay. I understand that but I don't understand how that really answers the question. In other words, the question is, what is it about the events that makes (sic) you sure that he did not come back on Saturday, and have another conversation with you?
TIRADO - Because I remember the fight. So if he (come) back, I would have remembered.
CORNWELL - Did Azcue work on Saturdays?
TIRADO - Yes, we used to work in the office but not for the public.
CORNWELL - Was there a guard, was there a guard out here at the corner near number seven on your diagram on Saturdays?
TIRADO - Excuse me?
CORNWELL - Was there a doorman out near the area that you marked as number seven, on the diagram?
TIRADO - Yes, but on Saturday he never let people ...
CORNWELL - Never let people in.
TIRADO - No.
Let us also remember that as we find further evidence that Oswald never took this trip... the FBI with people like the McFarlands and the Aussie girls accomplish the same thing they did with Bledsoe, put Oswald where they claim he was despite his not being there.