![]() |
|
New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-19.html) +--- Thread: New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences (/thread-2154.html) Pages:
1
2
|
New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Damien Lloyd - 17-09-2009 Jack now I want to debate the existance of a spirit more than Darwinism but won't as religious debate gets me in enough hot water as it is. I actually received a warning from my boss because of a debate I was having at work with a muslim, I might have offended him, or his religious views and found myself kicked out of a job... What about the offence to my views? I asked. Apparently being merely views and not 'religious views' makes them significantly less important. I have now started my own religion based on science that has nothing to do with aliens and volcanoes. As the information from our eyes is upside down and our brain reinterprets that information flipping everything around enabling me to percieve the universe. I have concluded that as the universe I perceive is in fact just my brains interpretation of that information my brain essentially creates everything in the universe when I wake in the morning and open my eyes. So I am God. Now you may be thinking "Ah hah, but when you wake you are merely looking at and therefore only creating what is around you and not the entire universe". And it would seem as though my theory is relative and we are all indeed gods. But that theses would depend on the answer to a question posed often by my disciples "do we exist when you are not here?" I freely admit I was extremely high when I discovered my new religion after a friend mentioned something about a tree falling in the woods killing a butterfly in a tornado which made no sense but sent my mind racing. Magda, Brits only show their stupidity in the privacy of their own homes do they? Take a look at this: http://www.genesisexpo.co.uk/ Oh I really have to go there. New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Keith Millea - 18-09-2009 Quote: have now started my own religion based on science that has nothing to do with aliens and volcanoes. As the information from our eyes is upside down and our brain reinterprets that information flipping everything around enabling me to percieve the universe. I have concluded that as the universe I perceive is in fact just my brains interpretation of that information my brain essentially creates everything in the universe when I wake in the morning and open my eyes. So I am God. Now you may be thinking "Ah hah, but when you wake you are merely looking at and therefore only creating what is around you and not the entire universe". And it would seem as though my theory is relative and we are all indeed gods. But that theses would depend on the answer to a question posed often by my disciples "do we exist when you are not here?" :adore: New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - David Guyatt - 18-09-2009 Damien Lloyd Wrote:I have now started my own religion based on science that has nothing to do with aliens and volcanoes. As the information from our eyes is upside down and our brain reinterprets that information flipping everything around enabling me to percieve the universe. I have concluded that as the universe I perceive is in fact just my brains interpretation of that information my brain essentially creates everything in the universe when I wake in the morning and open my eyes. So I am God. Now you may be thinking "Ah hah, but when you wake you are merely looking at and therefore only creating what is around you and not the entire universe". And it would seem as though my theory is relative and we are all indeed gods. But that theses would depend on the answer to a question posed often by my disciples "do we exist when you are not here?" Get away. I've met God and I know what you look like also, and God didn't look like you. Although there was a family resemblance, I admit. God is tall. So am I. God has white hair. So do I. God loves grapes. I love red wine too. And God can see a very long way. And since I have had my cataract operations I can see a gnat scratch his balls at a thousand yards. I, therefore, have to conclude (and it must by now be clear to everyone else) that I am God and that you are an impostor. My wrath should descend upon you for trying to purloin my street cred, but I've enough on my hands in Israel as it is. Sin-cerely Yours, David Jehovah. New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Keith Millea - 18-09-2009 Quote:And God can see a very long way. And since I have had my cataract operations I can see a gnat scratch his balls at a thousand yards.Only God can do that! :adore: New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Magda Hassan - 19-09-2009 Damien Lloyd Wrote:I have now started my own religion based on science that has nothing to do with aliens and volcanoes. As the information from our eyes is upside down and our brain reinterprets that information flipping everything around enabling me to percieve the universe. I have concluded that as the universe I perceive is in fact just my brains interpretation of that information my brain essentially creates everything in the universe when I wake in the morning and open my eyes. So I am God. Now you may be thinking "Ah hah, but when you wake you are merely looking at and therefore only creating what is around you and not the entire universe". And it would seem as though my theory is relative and we are all indeed gods. But that theses would depend on the answer to a question posed often by my disciples "do we exist when you are not here?" Quote:Originally Posted by David GuyattYou're both wrong. It is I. I am the true GOD. I am a goddess. Men worship me the universe revolves around me and the sun shines out of my arse. :girl: New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Keith Millea - 19-09-2009 Quote:Men worship me and the sun shines out of my arse. Only a TRUE Goddess can do that. :adore: New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Magda Hassan - 19-09-2009 Damien Lloyd Wrote:Magda, Brits only show their stupidity in the privacy of their own homes do they? Take a look at this: http://www.genesisexpo.co.uk/ Well, mostly. But look at it... it is done in such a British way. They haven't really got their heart in it. It looks like it is in the front rooms of some one's house. Plus the web site hasn't been up dated much in recent years. Guest book comments from 2007. And not too many of them either. Now the Americans take their Creationism seriously: http://images.google.com.au/images?q=creation%20museum&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi Huge displays. Indoor and out door exhibits. They really want to get noticed. But yes, I concede that there are stupid people (in public) in the UK. Some of them in leadership positions. But you didn't get Tony Blair advertising Opus Dei and God and Jesus during his election campaigns. In the US it seems you can't even get a look in unless you have got the Christian approved version of invisible being on the ballot ticket with you. New Charles Darwin film is 'too controversial' for religious American audiences - Charles Drago - 19-09-2009 Magda Hassan Wrote:You're both wrong. It is I. I am the true GOD. I am a goddess. Men worship me the universe revolves around me and the sun shines out of my arse. :girl: Guess where I'm applying #50 sunblock before our next date? |