+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Other (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-17.html)
+--- Thread: Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum (/thread-3254.html)
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 06-03-2010
You just have to see this level of 'evenhandedness' http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=15579&hl= :evil: :bebored: :listen: :reddy:
...and best summary of A.W. yet http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=15439&view=findpost&p=183076
hakehands:and this long-ago fictive un-factual, invented, venial lie from #1:
[sent as a PM] Andy Walker Re:xxxxxxxxx@volny.cz, Sep 17 2009, 10:39 PM
Administrator
Group: Admin
Posts: 2904
Member No.: 1
Joined: 15-December 03
you wrote eleswhere
'I've been informed I am perverting 'the other' Forum with my paranoid and global delusional disinformation'
You misunderstand (of course). I am actually asking you obliquely to stop perving young women on the Education Forum. I have had several documented complaints about you being a cyber sex pest from women members.
--------------------
Andy Walker
The Education Forum
Dartford Technology College
Andy Walker's Biography
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 07-03-2010
Simply NOT to be missed - maybe should be in the 'lounge' area. My response has been censored by A.W., but I said something to the effect of witnessing of the self-incrimination of a 'trickster'. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=15579&st=0
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Magda Hassan - 07-03-2010
He cant help himself can he? I notice that Wa ker thinks it is fine and dandy what he who shall remain nameless posted and doesn't want him to retract it. That is just reserved for you. :bebored:
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 07-03-2010
Oh it is getting better over there....witness: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=15439&view=findpost&p=185886 :bandit:
I think the guy from B stepped right in it...I didn't push nor pull.....he has carte blanche to call me an a**h****, but I was put in the dungeon [it now turns out] for having mentioned that there are 'tricksters' on the EF....a really 'tough' term I should be ashamed to have uttered.
ecruity:
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Nathaniel Heidenheimer - 07-03-2010
Wow did Andy really Type that? And was it in a private message? And did you ask to see the messages as proof? That is something that is truly dangerous to type about another person unless you have clear and presentable proof. That is no joke in todays day and age. That is something to consider legal fright about.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 07-03-2010
Nathaniel Heidenheimer Wrote:Wow did Andy really Type that? And was it in a private message? And did you ask to see the messages as proof? That is something that is truly dangerous to type about another person unless you have clear and presentable proof. That is no joke in todays day and age. That is something to consider legal fright about.
Nathaniel, Hi. First, thanks for your thread there. The post below it blew me away...but lets not get into that....I have to be very careful as I know that Walker monitors or has others monitor this website - he has said so himself recently on the other Forum [quoting some of my statements from here]. Magda watch those IPs :bandit:
Seriously, Yes, he accused me in Sept of last year. I was shocked. I'm pro-feminist and worked with my Mother and others actively on women's rights issues. I have NEVER done anything untoward to a woman physically or via internet, phone etc. I don't know if he made it out of whole cloth or misunderstood something someone said or someone was feeding him that to get me in trouble. I have not been told who it was, but was given some hints. Later he changed it to multiple women - which makes the absurd truly transcendental. You can almost count the number of women there and most are friends of mine or just another Forum member. It is in my opinion a McCarthyite tactic, 'I have here a list....' I'm not happy it came out in the public. I had been trying to deal with it privately with the other administrator. Nothing happened. I also warned the other administrator about two months ago in SEVERAL emails that I felt/sensed I was being set-up and stalked to entrap me and predicted exactly what happened....almost to a tee. I wonder why he doesn't go 'after', say, Caddy who also posts pro-conspiracy materials. I think it is clear Caddy is a licensed attorney and would sue his ass off if he pulled something like was pulled on me. That said, I have no funds [in fact will run out of them shortly], no job and no social safety net in any country. I can hardly go the legal route. I'll settle for clearing my name, shaming those that need to be shamed and moving on. Those here who left that cognitively infiltrated [and worse] area of internet bandwidth did so for a sane reason. Sadly, there are a few good people there still and some good information [if one can find it in an among the ****throwing that goes on even by one administrator and several of his apparent flock [or political block]. There is more I could say, posts I could post, emails I could put up there [though I am unable to post anything now], but it would make a bad situation worse and I will do so only as a last resort. I know I am innocent and certainly have not been able to be presented with any evidence, refute them, or prove them false. 'He has a list....' and I'm on it. I think it comes down to that and that he hates me for my political views - nothing more or less. One has to ask if it is a free speech zone or one person's-politically 'approved' zone - others beware. I have your private email address and might have more to say there. The internet has a way of making such things worse. I'm not a happy chappy. :motz:
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - David Guyatt - 07-03-2010
Far be it from me to comment on sexual perv issues against young ladies, but I have seen a nice video that's worth a quick squint, linked below.
I am aware of the psychological fact known as "projection", and I do know that it is the case that people in glass houses should be very careful when it comes to throwing stones.
If you were a "standard ordinary history teacher" in a "girls secondary modern school", that is to say "a girls school, dominated by women, on the staff as well..." making such accusations might be quite telling.
Accused by one's own mouth etc.
Friendly, avuncular, cheerful...
It always used to be a business trick when dealing with someone who puffs themselves up to imagine them stripped down naked.
But there are some cases where such an exercise can be more damaging to the psyche than an aid.
Forgive me Pete, but try as I may I can't take this man seriously.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Peter Lemkin - 07-03-2010
David Guyatt Wrote:Far be it from me to comment on sexual perv issues against young ladies, but I have seen a nice video that's worth a quick squint, linked below.
I am aware of the psychological fact known as "projection", and I do know that it is the case that people in glass houses should be very careful when it comes to throwing stones.
If you were a "standard ordinary history teacher" in a "girls secondary modern school", that is to say "a girls school, dominated by women, on the staff as well..." making such accusations might be quite telling.
Accused by one's own mouth etc.
Friendly, avuncular, cheerful...
It always used to be a business trick when dealing with someone who puffs themselves up to imagine them stripped down naked.
But there are some cases where such an exercise can be more damaging to the psyche than an aid.
Forgive me Pete, but try as I may I can't take this man seriously.
David, I only just caught my breath after a laughing fit...much needed and appreciated! :elefant: :aetsch: :flute:
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - Charles Drago - 07-03-2010
David Guyatt Wrote:Far be it from me to comment on sexual perv issues against young ladies, but I have seen a nice video that's worth a quick squint, linked below.
I am aware of the psychological fact known as "projection", and I do know that it is the case that people in glass houses should be very careful when it comes to throwing stones.
If you were a "standard ordinary history teacher" in a "girls secondary modern school", that is to say "a girls school, dominated by women, on the staff as well..." making such accusations might be quite telling.
Accused by one's own mouth etc.
Friendly, avuncular, cheerful...
It always used to be a business trick when dealing with someone who puffs themselves up to imagine them stripped down naked.
But there are some cases where such an exercise can be more damaging to the psyche than an aid.
Forgive me Pete, but try as I may I can't take this man seriously.
Not even the Hawkeye forgers could clean up this psychologically self-devastating cartoon.
No need to seek forgiveness, David. At least for our shared inability to take seriously the Twit of the Decade. Let us ridicule him all the way to the ignominy he so richly deserves.
But the suggestion to "imagine [him] stripped down naked" is another matter.
Here's what I get: Sarah Palin after a severe beating -- and with larger breasts.
I must go off now to poke out my mind's eye.
Okay, I'm back.
Central Casting, send me the perfect lead for the Dirty Headmaster project!
(That's "Headmaster" as in U.S. school principal; get your minds out of the gutter!)
Reminds me of a joke: A guy -- we'll call him Andrew, for such is the mood I'm in -- comes home from work one night to find his live-in paramour packing his/her bags.
"What's going on here?" asks Andrew.
"I'm leaving you," says he/she.
Andrew is perplexed. "May I ask after your motivation?"
The paramour says, "Today I found out that you're a pedophile!"
And Andrew, his falsetto voice dripping with faux admiration, says, "Hmmm ... 'pedophile.' That's a big word for a ten-year-old!"
Peter, the Walker entity orchestrated my departure from the EF -- and I still haven't found the proper words to express my gratitude -- by first banning my access to that forum while claiming that I was lying about being banned. Then he "argued" that my computer was failing; you see, I had exposed his game by using a friend's computer and membership -- until that Internet address too was banned.
Only the Britain that gave us Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair could have produced Not-So-Randy Andy. And how's that for a threesome ...
"Oh Tony" ... "Oh Andy" ... "Oh Tony" ... "Oh Andy" ... "BOYS! I'm over here!" "Coming, Prime Minister."
On more than one occasion I described this miscreant -- a self-advertised golf enthusiast -- as having a 9-iron shoved up his arse.
Only now, after seeing him half-live, do I realize that the club went in head-first.
Just Was Removed By Walker On Other Forum - David Guyatt - 07-03-2010
But I'm a self-advertised golf enthusiast.
Does this mean I need to watch my 9 iron? :hmmmm2:
A 9-iron is not a measurement by the way.
That would be a long iron.
But then again, the extent of these ambiguities are deep - as Shakespeare once might have said.