Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Paul - so you think Scahill is a spy too, as well as a member of your ever expanding band of "left-gatekeepers", which already includes Chomsky, Amy Goodman, Chris Hedges, several Cockburns etc.

Am I on your list yet?

Is Peter Dale Scott on your list?

It can only be a matter of time.

What a waste of a fine mind.

Nathaniel Heidenheimer Wrote:Jan I assume you are aware of the History of Encounter Magazine, the CIA funded left gatekeeping magazine. How do you propose that we USE this particular history? Do you deny the possibility that similar operations are going on right now? Go ahead and disagree, that's great. But just how do you propose we get the word out about left-gatekeeping. IMO it is strategy #1 in preventing potential majorities from recognizing their own strength. Knowledge of the historical fact of Encounter is sorely lacking in the wide CIA enclave known as the United States.

Nathaniel Heidenheimer Wrote:Jan I assume you are aware of the History of Encounter Magazine, the CIA funded left gatekeeping magazine. How do you propose that we USE this particular history? Do you deny the possibility that similar operations are going on right now? Go ahead and disagree, that's great. But just how do you propose we get the word out about left-gatekeeping. IMO it is strategy #1 in preventing potential majorities from recognizing their own strength. Knowledge of the historical fact of Encounter is sorely lacking in the wide CIA enclave known as the United States.

Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Encounter had a CIA agent on its editorial board in neocon godfather Irving Kristol, and - to my knowledge - published hardly any investigative exposes of deep black operations.

Quote:Encounter, June 1964, pp. 73-74, 76 & 78

Books & Writers: Whodunnit

By Goronwy Rees

Who Killed Kennedy? By Thomas G. Buchanan. Secker and Warburg, 18s.

For the overwhelming majority of Americans, the office of the President has a numinous quality which is reflected upon all its occupants. The President is hedged by a kind of divinity which has long ceased to surround a king. Thus, for Americans, there is something sacrilegious in the murder of a President, which others cannot wholly understand, however much they may sympathise. It is a desecration of the Union’s hallowed ground and for an American it is almost inconceivable that this could be anything except the work of a diseased and deranged personality. To think otherwise, one would have to assume that there are evil men who for their own ends would plot and conspire to violate the most sacred altars of the Republic, and, unless of course such men were Communists, this is something most Americans cannot bring themselves to accept.

Mr. Buchanan, himself an American, has now written a book which will outrage all such beliefs, or superstitions, and at the same time give profound offence to many who believe themselves to be friends of the United States. Who Killed Kennedy? is in many ways an unpleasant book. It is marred by that kind of sour malice, of innuendo and Schadenfreude, to which left-wingers (Mr. Buchanan is a recent ex-Communist) are so often unfortunately prone; even the shade of Jefferson Davis does not escape a perfectly irrelevant sneer. It is also marred by errors of historical interpretation which make one doubt Mr. Buchanan’s credentials as a commentator on the contemporary American scene. If he can be so wrong about the historical situation which led to the assassination of Lincoln, about which after all one knows a great deal, if still not everything, why should we trust his account of the forces which led to the assassination of Kennedy, about which we as yet know very little?

Nevertheless, it would be a pity if its faults denied Mr. Buchanan’s book the attention it deserves. Who Killed Kennedy? asks a serious question which demands a serious answer; and if no better answers are given than those we have already received from Dallas, one might reasonably conclude, as Mr. Buchanan does, that the United States may be threatened by even greater disasters than the murder of a President.

Jan Klimkowski Wrote:And your point is?

I don't see any original investigative research into deep black operations in that Encounter piece.

Jan Klimkowski Wrote:... to describe them as "left gatekeepers" because you disagree with this or that and thereby throw out everything published there is plain crazy.

Quote:“Policy flows from institutions reflecting the needs of power and privilege within them, and can be understood only if these factors are recognized, including the case now under review” (p.9).

Quote:“Kennedy escalated” (p.2); “John F. Kennedy’s escalation” (p.23); “Kennedy’s escalation” (p.27); “Kennedy…escalated the war” (p.37); “JFK raised the level of US attack” (p.43); “As he prepared to escalate the war…in late 1961” (p.46); “Kennedy’s 1961-62 escalation” (p.51); “his 1961-1962 escalation” (p.67).

Quote:”Kennedy’s war” (p.2); “Kennedy’s war” (p.36); “Kennedy’s war” (p.39); “Kennedy’s war” (p.52); “Kennedy’s war” (p.53); “Kennedy’s war” (p.69); “Kennedy’s war” (p.73); “Kennedy’s war” (p.81); “Kennedy’s war” (p.86); “Kennedy’s war” (p.105).

Quote:”Kennedy…his aggression” (p.15); “Kennedy moved on to armed attack” (p.25); “JFK’s aggression” (p.32); “JFK’s aggression” (p.35); “Kennedy’s aggression” (p.52); “Kennedy’s aggression” (p.63); “JFK’s 1961-1962 aggression” (p.66); “JFK’s aggression” (p.115).