British Airport security - the rationale - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: War on Workers and Labor Unions and Students (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-30.html) +--- Thread: British Airport security - the rationale (/thread-4706.html) |
British Airport security - the rationale - Magda Hassan - 30-10-2010 The United Arab Emirates' Civil Aviation Authority has rejected claims that a US-bound Emirates' flight from Dubai contained "suspicious" parcels from Yemen. Fighter jets were scrambled on Friday to accompany an Emirates plane into New York's JFK airport after a security alert, US media reported. Emirati authorities, however, said flight 201 carried no 'suspicious' cargo from Yemen as claimed by US-Canadian military agency NORAD. UAE officials rejected the claim and said the plane was not a source of threat. "The Emirates plane that arrived today in the United States from Dubai did not contain any packages from Yemen," the official Emirati WAM news agency quoted an unnamed source with the country's civil aviation body as saying. North American military agency caused a media hype after it reported the suspicious flight. "Out of an abundance of caution, the North American Aerospace Defense Command diverted two Canadian CF-18s to track a civilian aircraft that was determined to be an aircraft of interest as it flew into and over Canadian airspace," AFP quoted a NORAD statement as saying on Friday. "The civilian aircraft was passed to two US F-15s as it transited into US airspace and its ultimate destination at JFK airport," the statement added. According to a White House statement late Friday, Saudi Arabia had tipped it off before "packages from Yemen containing explosive materials" were found on US-bound planes. US President Barack Obama was informed later on Thursday about a "potential terrorist threat" from suspicious packages from Yemen on two cargo planes, one in Britain and the other in Dubai, the White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said. Meanwhile, the US president hinted at boosting the US military role in Yemen following reports about the "suspicious packages." http://www.presstv.ir/detail/148857.html British Airport security - the rationale - Ed Encho - 30-10-2010 Breaking today is the now standard of tying the false flag plot to the big bad bogeyman al CIAda. Big Sister, Janet Napolitano of Der Department of Heimat Security just out with this: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69T10Z20101030 BOO! Brought to the cowards in the world's largest lemming colony the day before Halloween by their protectors in the American War Machine and the propaganda mills that churn out this crap like it's link sausage made with tainted skunk meat. Quite an Experience to Live in Fear Isn't It? That is What it is to Be a Slave" -Roy Baty British Airport security - the rationale - Peter Lemkin - 30-10-2010 [QUOTE Meanwhile, the US president hinted at boosting the US military role in Yemen following reports about the "suspicious packages." [/QUOTE] AHA! Yet another motive for this provocation! Halliburton already has the contracts ready for Yemen...as do Xi and the other private military. Will take care of them Ah-rabs jus the way we took care of the In-juns! [and for the same reasons!]...somethings haven't changed in the dark hearts of dark-hearted men! British Airport security - the rationale - Paul Rigby - 30-10-2010 Paul Rigby Wrote:The whole dismal rigmarole is a complete nonsense dreamt up by perverts and weirdos within the Terrorism Industry, strange men and women content - nay, delighted - to spend their days patting other people's privates and inspecting their soiled smalls. Quote:The foreplay search: Outrage at new airport security check so invasive it will 'become a moral issue' Despotic perverts, the lot of 'em. British Airport security - the rationale - Ed Encho - 30-10-2010 "AHA! Yet another motive for this provocation! Halliburton already has the contracts ready for Yemen...as do Xi and the other private military. Will take care of them Ah-rabs jus the way we took care of the In-juns! [and for the same reasons!]...somethings haven't changed in the dark hearts of dark-hearted men!" OBushma now is going to need another war to stave off the coming wave of impeachment sleaze that is coming his way when the cesspool known as the U.S. Congress is churned on Tuesday and the Great Clinton Blow Job Inquisition II will be on. I am sure that the filthy scumbagger neoNazi Republicans will do anything to get B.O. to produce his birth certificate and maybe even try to get him to drop trou so they can see Mr. Wiggly just like they did with Bubba. They are revving up the Rapture Bus now here in fascist America. EE British Airport security - the rationale - Magda Hassan - 31-10-2010 Another thought is that there is a strike on by the London fire fighters (amongst others). I wonder if the parcel had some thing to do with undermining their cause? Who would put out the fire on the plane if the bomb went off?....blood on their hands.....too busy working a second job..... yadda yadda British Airport security - the rationale - David Guyatt - 31-10-2010 And the band plays on: Quote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/police-machine-gun-squads-for-britain/story-e6frea73-1225945812696?from=public_rss The foregoing is reported by today's Sunday Times which is now pay to read. And: Quote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1325224/U-S-wants-aircraft-carrier-Thames-Estuary-Olympics.html What a delightful prospect - machine gun armed police on the streets and a US warship "flying the flag" and providing SpecForces personnel for security at London Olympics. Of course, everyone knows that the UK has no special forces personnel at all, no SAS, no Commando regiments, no Special Boat Squadron, no Para's - and naturally we don't have any warplanes close to the Thames Estuary. So, let's bring US military occupation of Blighty on, baby. On the plus side it'll remove the need for rendition flights - just ship them onto US sovereign "soil" in ol' father Thames. We can all line-up, buy snacks and sugar-drinks and settle down to enjoy the new show in town, as we watch the power-grid diminish as extra-judicial "terrorist" suspects get frazzled, and see the water-levels of the Thames lower as water-boarding becomes the deck-sport of the choice. Luvely. Bring back pubic executions I say. British Airport security - the rationale - David Guyatt - 31-10-2010 Magda Hassan Wrote:Another thought is that there is a strike on by the London fire fighters (amongst others). I wonder if the parcel had some thing to do with undermining their cause? Assuming the potentially sinister and suspicious package was a "bomb" and not a simple ol' printer cartridge. We might want to bear in mind that the sinister package was not found on the first search by UK authorities. It was only found on the second "look harder" search ("we fookin' planted the device so fooking go and find it, 'kay!"). British Airport security - the rationale - Magda Hassan - 31-10-2010 You have got to be fucking joking?????? Having lived through the years of marketing horror that was the Sydney Olympics there is no way I would actually pay good money to go to some one elses corporate advertising big dick extravaganza but assuming I was mad enough to do so I would be cancelling my tickets and reservations and going to a nice quiet tropical island to watch handsome native boys climb coconut trees. Why on earth would any sentient being subject them selves to this? Let alone the poor natives of London. British Airport security - the rationale - David Guyatt - 31-10-2010 Magda Hassan Wrote:You have got to be fucking joking?????? Yeah. I went to the recent Ryder Cup in Wales with my sons and grandson and a good time was had by all. Eventually. But the entrance security came as a massive surprise. A small golf radio tuned into the Ryder Cup radio station that was lent to me by a friend was confiscated. On the other hand I could easily pay £10.00 and buy a new one inside the Course and, thereafter, carry this into the event without any trouble. Rucksacks bigger than 8 x 8 x 8 were forbidden and had to be turned in to be held in safe-keeping till the end of the day. Thus all waterproofs had to be worn and not carried, sandwiches and food was effectively binned (to be bought on-site of course) and mobile phones also had to be turned over to security. On site a hot sausage in a roll cost £6.50. It was a profit-fest. And the 40,000 "spectators" who were lucky to have spent nearly £100.00 a day to get in unbeknownst to them underwent a security check before tickets were "awarded" to them. All this to be treated like garbage. Never again. |