William Kelly Wrote:

Peter Lemkin Wrote:

Albert Doyle Wrote:I would think the Bolden Chicago case would be a more effective introduction to the Kennedy case because there's better evidence involved than the Tippit case. If you use the Tippit case as the source of the challenge they'll fuzz it up and say there's not enough solid evidence either way. The Bolden case is much more damning with much more obvious evidence.

In my mind they'll defeat any case based on Tippit. The Bolden case is a much better means because it would serve as good momentum to then head towards the Kennedy material after gaining a win. However I'm not sure if the Bolden case is more of a federal case, in which case would be like allowing the foxes to rule on their doings in the hen house.

Can Texas be trusted as a fair venue?

I agree Chicago is a good idea...how about both simultaneously in the two venues. They [THEY] are going to make it more-than-hard any way you try......Texas, especially Dallas is a horrible venue, but the entire USA is, with the possible exception of a few tiny progressive areas not relevant enough....but even those areas can be controlled. It is a noble deed Bill and I'm behind it 100% and think it must be done...this is the last window [from now to the 50th]...but warn you it will be more difficult than you think and you need some big names [in show biz; in politics; in foreign countries; in writers and thinkers; in Nobel Prize winners; in witnesses; in everything you can think of...and of course lots of average and angry to curious Americans...... You need a public and a private webpage for this - the public one with a blog. Best of luck - you/we are going to need it.

We are going to put on a full court press.

Of cousre Watkins dosn't have jurisdiciton in Chicago, that's why he should have a grand jury investigation of the Tippit murder, and there are a number of new witnesses who have never testified, a number of additional suspects other than Oswald, and it would be a case that Watkins' office could handle in house.

JFK will take a Special Federal Grand Jury, like that which was used to prosecute the assassination of the Chilian Ambassador in DC and the one Fitzgerald used to prosecute the Valarie Palme CIA leak - with a special prosecutor like Fitzgerald and the lawers who prosecuted the DC assassination (Gene Proper).

Although I won't reveal their identies, two working federal prosecutors and a retired federal DA have contacted me after reading my JFKcountercoup.blogspot articles on the Basis for Legal Action, saying they agreed with me, and would be willing to help.

One, a working asst. federal DA, wants to use the RICO stautes and the Pinkerton Doctrine to prosecute the JFK case.

The best part of getting a grand jury investigation going into either JFK or Tippit is that you don't have to convince the entire world to do it, just one person - the DA who is responsible for conveining the grand jury. Once it is done, it is an active grand jury for 18 months, and its proceedings are secret.

BK

http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2008/01/jfk-grand-jury-basis-for-legal-action.html