+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-Deep-Politics-Forum)
+--- Forum: War is a Racket (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/Forum-War-is-a-Racket)
+--- Thread: Experimental Mach-20 aircraft set for launch at Vandenberg AFB (/Thread-Experimental-Mach-20-aircraft-set-for-launch-at-Vandenberg-AFB)
Pages:
1
2
Experimental Mach-20 aircraft set for launch at Vandenberg AFB - Magda Hassan - 13-08-2011
Bernice Moore Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote::plane::flypig::orly:
Superfast Military Aircraft Crashed in Pacific Ocean, DARPA Says
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/superfast-military-aircraft-crashed-pacific-ocean-darpa-says-210201382.html
:pointlaugh::joystick::panic:
Experimental Mach-20 aircraft set for launch at Vandenberg AFB - Ed Jewett - 13-08-2011
Bernice Moore Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote::plane:
Superfast Military Aircraft Crashed in Pacific Ocean, DARPA Says
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/superfast-military-aircraft-crashed-pacific-ocean-darpa-says-210201382.html
Does a Mach 20 splash create a tsunami? :angeldevil:
Is there an actual report of a splash-down?
Is the thing still up there circling?
Is it visible on any kind of system?
Experimental Mach-20 aircraft set for launch at Vandenberg AFB - Ed Jewett - 26-08-2011
DARPA animation of their new toy
(speed comparison of 747, F-15, and the thing they keep splashin')
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gTloAHlwOs&feature=player_embedded
Experimental Mach-20 aircraft set for launch at Vandenberg AFB - Ed Jewett - 29-11-2011
World War III Scenario. America's Hypersonic Missile: Who is the Target?
by Rick Rozoff
by Rick Rozoff
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2, align: left"]Global Research, November 28, 2011
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2, align: left"]Voice of Russia and Stop NATO
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2, align: left"][TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]John Robles Interviews Rick Rozoff, manager of the Stop NATO website and Global Research Correspondent.
The first thing that is on everybody's minds is President Medvedev's statement regarding NATO. Why at this late date exactly, at this juncture?
In a rather alarming manner we've seen an expanding recruitment for the U.S. missile system in Europe, through the mechanism of NATO, in the last couple of months where, in addition to the countries where we know there are going to be US interceptor missiles stationed, the deployment of a Forward-Based X-Band Radar facility in Turkey has been confirmed.
We've also seen the recruitment of nations like Spain, the Netherlands and others into what the White House and the Pentagon refer to as the European Phased Adaptive Approach missile system, one that is going to proceed in four phases, the third and fourth phases with the introduction of very advanced-stage Standard Missile-3 land-based interceptors, with the understanding that these can be employed not strictly for defensive purposes but to target all Russian strategic deterrent forces and capabilities in Europe.
Recently, the U.S. and NATO conducted tests for their new hypersonic missile. Could you tell the listeners a little bit about that?
Earlier this month, the US DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) did just that. It's actually an interdepartmental weapon system, its part of what's called Conventional Prompt Global Strike, or sometimes simply Prompt Global Strike.
Last year, for example, the Obama administration asked for somewhere in the neighbourhood of a quarter of a billion dollars for this year to develop the capacity. It's meant to deliver conventional weapon attacks to any site on the planet within no more than 60 minutes. And what happened earlier this month was that the U.S. Army tested the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW), which traveled an estimated 7,400 km/h, which is over six times the speed of sound.
In August, an unsuccessful test of an AHW-related component was to have traveled at 27,000 km/h, which is over MACH 20 that is 20 times the speed of sound. To be hypersonic one has to exceed MACH 5, or five times the speed of sound.
The day before President Medvedev's statement about moving mobile ISKANDER missiles into the Kaliningrad District, but also potentially into Belarus and into the southern Krasnodar region, which would be closer to US missiles in Romania and to the NATO radar facility in Turkey, Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov mentioned that Russia's new air-defense systems are capable of intercepting any kind of missiles, including U.S. interceptor missiles but also, he explicitly mentioned, hypersonic weapons.
He said that explicitly? Hypersonic?
Yes, he said it specifically in reference to the test that had been conducted a week earlier by the U.S.
You mentioned earlier this was a part of the Prompt Global Strike system? Is this a first-strike system?
I'll read you a comment that was made a couple of years ago by a person who is now retired, then-Vice Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Cartwright, who stated that the proclaimed intent of the Prompt Global Strike program was to deliver strikes by conventional missiles or heavy bombers long-range bombers anywhere on the face of the Earth within an hour.
Marine General James Cartwright stated: "At the high end, strikes could be delivered in 300 milliseconds," which is a fraction of a second.
There was also a comment by another person who is now retired, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Defense William Lynn, who stated roughly the same thing a year and a half ago. He said: "The next air warfare priority for the Pentagon is developing a next-generation, deep-penetrating strike capability that can overcome air defenses," meaning again that a first-strike capability or part of a general first-strike capability that would permit the US to strike fast, deep and undetected presumably into the interior of countries that have advanced air defense systems. I can only think of three countries that would match that description Iran, to a lesser extent, and Russia and China, to a greater.
How would this all tie in with the Cyber Warfare Center that's been active recently in Estonia?
Yes, in 2008, NATO set up one of what they call, what NATO calls, a Center of Excellence, a Cyber Defense Centre in the capital of Estonia, in reaction to cyber attacks, real or alleged.
So we have three components being integrated, one of them being the so-called global missile shield. But, first of all, there is no real assurance that the missiles in fact pack a non-explosive warhead. They are supposed to be what are called kinetic or hit-to-kill missiles, but at any time that the U.S. chooses I suspect it can put a strategic warhead on one of these missiles after they are deployed in Poland or Romania and no one would be the wiser.
We know that the momentous statement by President Medvedev on Wednesday cited the fact that Russia was not consulted about anything. In his own words, the U.S. rather blithely announces developments after the fact or rather the president or defense minister of Russia have to read in Western newspapers information concerning U.S. plans to deploy, under NATO auspices, 48 Standard Missile-3 interceptors in Romania and Poland, 24 each, and, as he put it, it's presented to Russia as an accomplished fact.
With that lack of consultation, with that lack of openness, transparency, one would be justified in fearing the ultimate purpose of U.S. missiles in nations like Poland and Romania or ship-based versions of Standard Missile-3 interceptors that will be deployed in the Baltic Sea and may well find their way into the Barents, Norwegian and Black Seas.
Stop NATO e-mail list home page with archives and search engine:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato/messages
Stop NATO website and articles:
http://rickrozoff.wordpress.com
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]