Charles Drago Wrote:Gary Aguilar on Richard Lipsey:

RICHARD A. LIPSEY - an aide to General Wehle who was Commanding
General of the military District of Washington, U. S. Army, he was
present at JFK's autopsy. In an interview with the HSCA's Andy Purdy
and Mark Flanagan on 1-18-78, he claimed that the autopsists "were
'absolutely, unequivocally' convinced that he (JFK) had been shot
three times...there were three separate wounds and three separate
bullets.". Lipsey gave a confusing account of JFK's head wound. He
"identified the entrance in the lower head as being just inside the
hairline", but claimed that there was "no real entrance in the rear of
the head...one bullet blasted away an entire portion (entrance and
exit)..." (sic). Purdy also reported that Lipsey felt that "one bullet
entered the back of the head and exited resulting in part of the face
and head being blown away" (HSCA, JFK Collection, RG 233) Lipsey
completed an autopsy face sheet diagram that depicted an area of the
right lateral skull missing, anterior and posterior to the ear, where
he had written "same area blown away as wound". In addition, there was
a wound low in the skull, presumably of entrance, that was the source
of the throat exit wound, which he labeled bullet #2. Finally there
was a wound on the back, labeled #3 but the bullet could not be found
in the body Lipsey claimed.

Confusion. Self-contradiction. Half-truth, half-Gospel. And now all endorsed by the Great Obviscator Hissef.

Dipsey-doodle, Lipsey-loodle.

Richard Lipsey is the key to this case.

And my biological mother had an undescended testicle.

Charles Drago Wrote:Read me very carefully, LaChapelle.

Your broad, deep ignorance and arrogance are on ample display on DPF.

You either know nothing of my work, or your intention/brief is to diminish it.

Your Richard Lipsey gambit is nothing more than the Man in the Doorway gambit recontextualized.

You are now traveling in "Cinque" territory.

Which is to say, you're sunk.

Expect a call from Jim Fetzer, you champion-in-waiting.

Russ LaChapelle Wrote:

Charles Drago Wrote:Read me very carefully, LaChapelle.

Your broad, deep ignorance and arrogance are on ample display on DPF.

You either know nothing of my work, or your intention/brief is to diminish it.

Your Richard Lipsey gambit is nothing more than the Man in the Doorway gambit recontextualized.

You are now traveling in "Cinque" territory.

Which is to say, you're sunk.

Expect a call from Jim Fetzer, you champion-in-waiting.

anta:

Albert Doyle Wrote:I found Lipsey's description of the wounds confusing. It sounds like he was trying to say the back wound went down into the body. His description of the head wound was muddled. I think he recognized the skull flap portion that was blown open. I suppose he then had to recognize the throat wound as an entry wound.

One thing he does describe in clear detail is the removal of JFK's torso organs in totality in what Lipsey describes as a search for the missing back wound bullet. If this description is accurate it contradicts the Warren Report official version in itself.

Russ LaChapelle Wrote:Richard Lipsey also has disclosed he doesn't believe there was a conspiracy... this is very, very important to the understanding of his vantage.

Richard Lipsey was a chosen rookie. Understand that he was, in fact, just this and your on your way to the solving of this case.

Jan Klimkowski Wrote:

Russ LaChapelle Wrote:Richard Lipsey also has disclosed he doesn't believe there was a conspiracy... this is very, very important to the understanding of his vantage.

Richard Lipsey was a chosen rookie. Understand that he was, in fact, just this and your on your way to the solving of this case.

LaChapelle - I don't believe you'd manage to spot a "very, very important" element of this case if it sprouted legs, performed a double somersault, and then slapped you in the face with a wet fish.

Cut the pretentious doggerel and give DPF one good reason to allow you to continue spamming up this forum with your nonsense.

Btw it's "you're on your way".