+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? (/thread-8626.html)
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Albert Doyle - 19-02-2012
The danger of the Fetzer Assassination School...
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Charles Drago - 19-02-2012
The dangers posed by those who, throwing the lessons of deep politics to the winds, fail to see the larger issues.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Greg Burnham - 19-02-2012
I am deeply troubled that Jim has come to this. In a hundred years I never would have imagined it. I will forgive this, but never will I forget it.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Albert Doyle - 29-02-2012
There's been a Groden scan posted on Lancer that pretty much demolishes any doorway alteration claims.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Lauren Johnson - 29-02-2012
Albert Doyle Wrote:There's been a Groden scan posted on Lancer that pretty much demolishes any doorway alteration claims.
Mind putting up a link?
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Albert Doyle - 29-02-2012
Groden scan of Altgens 6 from original negative:
http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=3&topic_id=95156&mesg_id=95156&page=
.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Peter Lemkin - 29-02-2012
Albert Doyle Wrote:Groden scan of Altgens 6 from original negative:In this kind of work with original photos [on photographic paper], computers are more of a curse than a blessing, most of the time. Yes, computers, if used properly and by someone trustworthy having obtained an image from others that were trustworthy down the line, can see 'into' the image and see things the eye can not, but good old fashioned photography is where 'its at' at obtaining the best materials to study, still!
http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=3&topic_id=95156&mesg_id=95156&page=
.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Albert Doyle - 29-02-2012
Peter Lemkin Wrote:In this kind of work with original photos [on photographic paper], computers are more of a curse than a blessing, most of the time. Yes, computers, if used properly and by someone trustworthy having obtained an image from others that were trustworthy down the line, can see 'into' the image and see things the eye can not, but good old fashioned photography is where 'its at' at obtaining the best materials to study, still!
Totally agree. We live in an age where lower quality fuzzy images or sound are being passed-off as the next advance only because it is easier for those selling the technology. It's symbolic in a way.
Line-up under your corporate robotron dispenser in this brave new world. It's profiteers seeking a new market in lowered and dumbed-down expectations and a lowered horizon.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Charles Drago - 02-08-2012
Has the entity "Ralph Cinque" resurfaced, under an assumed name, at the EF Swamp?
On May 27 of this year, there appeared on the EF a character who deals primarily with photo interpretation -- and does so with pitiful illogic, manic prolificacy, and the application of modest and oddly familiar graphic skills.
In little more than two months, he has made 155 posts -- many of them in the in-your-face style of "Cinque."
As "Cinque" fixated on Altgens 6, this guy obsesses over the Dealey Plaza shape/figure know as Black Dog Man. His "Black Dog Man is a woman with a baby... " thread bears all the hallmarks of a "Cinque" provocation, especially the my-way-or-the-highway certainty he brings to matters deeply uncertain.
The guy may be legit and just plain foolish.
Or "Cinque" may be back.
Let's wait to see if Jim Fetzer endorses the guy's work.
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady? - Charles Drago - 03-08-2012
Over at the EF swamp, the reliable Joseph Backes seems to share my view of the "Cinque" clone -- at least to the degree that he rejects the clone's "research" as charlatanism of the lowest order.