+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum (/thread-1922.html)
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Jan Klimkowski - 11-08-2009
Jack White Wrote:Interestingly, one of my posts about Colby has been made
"invisible" by Burton because I called him the "Colby entity".
Also, as a nuisance factor, I am now required to log in every day.
Jack
Jack - you are a most patient man.
You were also responsible for exposing the 9/11 disinformation site of "Len Brasil/Brazil", which claims to publish "peer-reviewed papers", but in fact prints toilet paper.
Of course, even in our crazy world, you can't find peers prepared to review soiled bog roll....
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Peter Lemkin - 11-08-2009
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Interestingly, one of my posts about Colby has been made
"invisible" by Burton because I called him the "Colby entity".
Also, as a nuisance factor, I am now required to log in every day.
Jack
Jack - you are a most patient man.
You were also responsible for exposing the 9/11 disinformation site of "Len Brasil/Brazil", which claims to publish "peer-reviewed papers", but in fact prints toilet paper.
Of course, even in our crazy world, you can't find peers to review used bog roll....
The purpose of JOD911, is "to foster activity which leads to the truth about the events on 9/11." Consistent with this purpose, the Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theorist reports original research relevant to any part of the 911 controversy. Papers may be of either applied or basic character. They must contain work that has not been published and is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere, and they should be clearly written and as concise as is consistent with communication of understanding of the subject. They must not be bias for "normal collapse by impact and fire," in keeping with our goal to "Debunk" in general.
The authors must identify clearly their original contribution (a new concept, method, result, or interpretation, or a state-of-the-art review from a new viewpoint, etc.). This contribution must be reflected in the abstract and conclusions. If there are several results, the conclusions should consist of numbered items. The paper must be adequately correlated to previous publications and very specialized or abstract results must be interpreted for a broader readership.
The authors must not include events which took place previous to 911 (political policies, statements, folded money, Album covers, etc.) which are logical fallacies and have nothing to do with the mechanics of collapse.
The authors must indicate a desire to stay anonymous and provide an anonymous ID which can be published on the internet. Anonymity is provided to prevent harassment from fringe members of the 911 conspiracy movement.
© 2006 Journal Of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories.
Executive Editor: ScottS
Advisory Board:
Shagster [real class here!]
Len Brazil
Mike Williams http://www.911myths.com
Debunking911 http:http://www.debunking911.com
JamesB http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com
The Journal of Debunking 911 is a free online publication dedicated to educating the public on the collapse of the three World Trade Center structures on September 11 2001.
----------------------------------------------
And he has the timerity to challenge the e-journal that the nanothermite paper was published in - as well as some Nobel Prize winning scientists!
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Peter Lemkin - 12-08-2009
Burton tries to throw down the gauntlet....
"Evan Burton Today, 11:03 AM
Post #76 |
So, are we going to see actual proof of these accusations against Len? Or is it just another "throw mud and run" tactic from the 'other forum'? "
[Any here that would not want to post there, but rather have me post as your proxy, and list you as the author, feel free....]
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Charles Drago - 12-08-2009
This is a ham-handed attempt to engage us.
They're not smart enough or cunning enough to succeed. Period.
I shall do everything in my power as a co-owner of the Deep Politics Forum to make certain that "Colby" and "Burton" and their ilk are exposed for what they are.
I and others have exposed "Len Colby" as a channel for disinformation.
I and others have exposed "Evan Burton" as a channel for disinformation.
I and others have exposed the Education Forum as their masters' willing executioner.
Peter, it ain't gonna happen. Your invitation to serve as a proxy is, to be blunt, insulting to all of us who understand the following:
To engage is to dignify.
To expose is to destroy.
Do as you see fit. But the Deep Politics Forum will not engage the enemy on its terms.
We have more effective ways to champion truth.
Accordingly, everyone who reads these words is on notice: The owners of the Deep Politics Forum neither sanction nor in any other way support efforts to engage the agents provocateur who have taken over the Education Forum. Any statement to the contrary should be viewed as disinformation.
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Peter Lemkin - 12-08-2009
Charles Drago Wrote:This is a ham-handed attempt to engage us.
They're not smart enough or cunning enough to succeed. Period.
I shall do everything in my power as a co-owner of the Deep Politics Forum to make certain that "Colby" and "Burton" and their ilk are exposed for what they are.
I and others have exposed "Len Colby" as a channel for disinformation.
I and others have exposed "Evan Burton" as a channel for disinformation.
I and others have exposed the Education Forum as their masters' willing executioner.
Peter, it ain't gonna happen. Your invitation to serve as a proxy is, to be blunt, insulting to all of us who understand the following:
To engage is to dignify.
To expose is to destroy.
Do as you see fit. But the Deep Politics Forum will not engage the enemy on its terms.
We have more effective ways to champion truth.
Accordingly, everyone who reads these words is on notice: The owners of the Deep Politics Forum neither sanction nor in any other way support efforts to engage the agents provocateur who have taken over the Education Forum. Any statement to the contrary should be viewed as disinformation.
So post/or have others post to 'expose to destroy'. I don't think we are on opposite sides on this, yet you 'paint' me on the 'other' or 'another' side.
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Charles Drago - 12-08-2009
No, Peter.
I'm not "painting" you as anything.
I am, however, opining that you are making a tragic mistake by trying to play a rigged game on a rigged field.
The EF is lost to us -- until and unless John Simkin takes a mega-dose of Growacet and summons the courage to cast out the enemy's proxys.
Again, do as you wish.
We -- the Deep Politics Forum -- are not the cyber-world's policeman. We've exposed "Colby" and "Burton" and others on the EF -- which, by the way, is rapidly approaching McAdam status as the gold standard for disinformation founts.
We'll continue the good fight here, and we're counting on you to stay with us.
In friendship,
Charlie
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Myra Bronstein - 12-08-2009
Charles Drago Wrote:No, Peter.
I'm not "painting" you as anything.
I am, however, opining that you are making a tragic mistake by trying to play a rigged game on a rigged field.
The EF is lost to us -- until and unless John Simkin takes a mega-dose of Growacet and summons the courage to cast out the enemy's proxys.
Again, do as you wish.
We -- the Deep Politics Forum -- are not the cyber-world's policeman. We've exposed "Colby" and "Burton" and others on the EF -- which, by the way, is rapidly approaching McAdam status as the gold standard for disinformation founts.
We'll continue the good fight here, and we're counting on you to stay with us.
In friendship,
Charlie
Charlie,
To quote Jan: "you are a most patient man."
And a funny one. "A mega-dose of Growacet." :hahaha::hahaha::rock:
Last, but not least, I agree with every word you've said on this thread and thank you for saying it.
Myra
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Peter Lemkin - 12-08-2009
Charles Drago Wrote:No, Peter.
I'm not "painting" you as anything.
I am, however, opining that you are making a tragic mistake by trying to play a rigged game on a rigged field.
The EF is lost to us -- until and unless John Simkin takes a mega-dose of Growacet and summons the courage to cast out the enemy's proxys.
Again, do as you wish.
We -- the Deep Politics Forum -- are not the cyber-world's policeman. We've exposed "Colby" and "Burton" and others on the EF -- which, by the way, is rapidly approaching McAdam status as the gold standard for disinformation founts.
We'll continue the good fight here, and we're counting on you to stay with us.
In friendship,
Charlie
Alas, This Forum will not loose me, the other very well may - but I was trying to give it one more 'shot' there. I hear you clearly....you have shot your bolt with them.....so be it. We all have different notions on how to battle 'the Beast', but I am sure we see the same 'Beast' to be battled, Friend and Collegue.
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Myra Bronstein - 12-08-2009
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:No, Peter.
I'm not "painting" you as anything.
I am, however, opining that you are making a tragic mistake by trying to play a rigged game on a rigged field.
The EF is lost to us -- until and unless John Simkin takes a mega-dose of Growacet and summons the courage to cast out the enemy's proxys.
Again, do as you wish.
We -- the Deep Politics Forum -- are not the cyber-world's policeman. We've exposed "Colby" and "Burton" and others on the EF -- which, by the way, is rapidly approaching McAdam status as the gold standard for disinformation founts.
We'll continue the good fight here, and we're counting on you to stay with us.
In friendship,
Charlie
Alas, This Forum will not loose me, the other very well may - but I was trying to give it one more 'shot' there. I hear you clearly....you have shot your bolt with them.....so be it. We all have different notions on how to battle 'the Beast', but I am sure we see the same 'Beast' to be battled, Friend and Collegue.
Thanks for understanding Peter.
The unmentionable - the 'other' Forum - Dawn Meredith - 13-08-2009
Jack White Wrote:Interestingly, one of my posts about Colby has been made
"invisible" by Burton because I called him the "Colby entity".
Also, as a nuisance factor, I am now required to log in every day.
Jack
That happened to me too, having to log in every day. It was right after DPF was formed. Never had that problem before. So just one more reason I don't post there. To do so requires obtaining a new password to log on. They are so long and a few times I wrote it down a a piece of paper, but just the act of having to type in so many characters to log on was too much of a hassle.
Sure don't miss the attack dogs and posers. I agree with the others here, Peter. They will just weigh you down, my friend. Minds will not be changed
Dawn