![]() |
|
The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Seminal Moments of Justice (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention (/thread-5107.html) |
The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Peter Lemkin - 14-03-2011 Al Jazeera - English [great if you haven't yet discovered it!!!] had the only interview to my knowledge given by snitch Adrian Lamo, now living in fear of his life. It is worth looking at, can't find a transcript.....his 'explanation' is pathetic and I think he was working for the Govt. Not surprised he is now in fear of his pathetic life. angryfire The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Carsten Wiethoff - 11-04-2011 The following is an open letter signed by more than 250 researchers and law professionals. ( http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/apr/28/private-mannings-humiliation/) Private Manning's Humiliation Bruce Ackerman and Yochai Benkler Bradley Manning is the soldier charged with leaking US government documents to Wikileaks. He is currently detained under degrading and inhumane conditions that are illegal and immoral. For nine months, Manning has been confined to his cell for twenty-three hours a day. During his one remaining hour, he can walk in circles in another room, with no other prisoners present. He is not allowed to doze off or relax during the day, but must answer the question "Are you OK?" verbally and in the affirmative every five minutes. At night, he is awakened to be asked again "Are you OK?" every time he turns his back to the cell door or covers his head with a blanket so that the guards cannot see his face. During the past week he was forced to sleep naked and stand naked for inspection in front of his cell, and for the indefinite future must remove his clothes and wear a "smock" under claims of risk to himself that he disputes. The sum of the treatment that has been widely reported is a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against punishment without trial. If continued, it may well amount to a violation of the criminal statute against torture, defined as, among other things, "the administration or application…of… procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality." Private Manning has been designated as an appropriate subject for both Maximum Security and Prevention of Injury (POI) detention. But he asserts that his administrative reports consistently describe him as a well-behaved prisoner who does not fit the requirements for Maximum Security detention. The brig psychiatrist began recommending his removal from Prevention of Injury months ago. These claims have not been publicly contested. In an Orwellian twist, the spokesman for the brig commander refused to explain the forced nudity "because to discuss the details would be a violation of Manning's privacy." The administration has provided no evidence that Manning's treatment reflects a concern for his own safety or that of other inmates. Unless and until it does so, there is only one reasonable inference: this pattern of degrading treatment aims either to deter future whistleblowers, or to force Manning to implicate Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in a conspiracy, or both. If Manning is guilty of a crime, let him be tried, convicted, and punished according to law. But his treatment must be consistent with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. There is no excuse for his degrading and inhumane pretrial punishment. As the State Department's P.J. Crowley put it recently, they are "counterproductive and stupid." And yet Crowley has now been forced to resign for speaking the plain truth. The Wikileaks disclosures have touched every corner of the world. Now the whole world watches America and observes what it does, not what it says. President Obama was once a professor of constitutional law, and entered the national stage as an eloquent moral leader. The question now, however, is whether his conduct as commander in chief meets fundamental standards of decency. He should not merely assert that Manning's confinement is "appropriate and meet[s] our basic standards," as he did recently. He should require the Pentagon publicly to document the grounds for its extraordinary actionsand immediately end those that cannot withstand the light of day. Bruce Ackerman Yale Law School New Haven, Connecticut Yochai Benkler Harvard Law School Cambridge, Massachusetts Additional Signers: Jack Balkin, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Alexander M. Capron, Norman Dorsen, Michael W. Doyle, Randall Kennedy, Mitchell Lasser, Sanford Levinson, David Luban, Frank I. Michelman, Robert B. Reich, Kermit Roosevelt, Kim Scheppele, Alec Stone Sweet, Laurence H. Tribe, and more than 250 others. A complete list of signers has been posted on the blog balkinization. The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Peter Lemkin - 11-04-2011 The isolation of Bradley Manning just took a turn for the worse. ![]() Now Quantico Marine Base and the government are breaking their own rules to deny visits to Bradley Manning. Government officials and Quantico Marine Base have just declared that Congressman Dennis Kucinich and the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture - who have tried to visit Manning for months - would not be considered to be on "official government business." That means brig authorities could monitor their conversations and possibly use them against Manning in court. We need to appeal this decision to the leadership at Quantico and the Pentagon, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Quantico Base Commander Colonel Daniel J. Choike, and Brig Commander CWO Denise Barnes. If enough of us call out this wrongheaded decision, we can generate pressure in the media to allow official visits with Bradley Manning. Sign our letter to Quantico and Pentagon leaders: follow your own rules and allow official visits to PFC. Bradley Manning. Click here to add your name. What do Quantico and the Pentagon have to hide? Are they afraid of what Bradley Manning might say about his treatment when the brig cameras are turned off? For 9 months and counting, Bradley Manning has faced almost complete solitary confinement. He is still forced to strip nude nightly. He is still in maximum custody with an unnecessary "Prevention of Injury" order - far beyond that of any other detainee. He is still cut off from appropriate exercise and other rights afforded prisoners at the brig. When confronted about Manning's harsh treatment, President Obama said the Pentagon had reassured him that Manning's confinement met "basic standards." If Manning's conditions meets our "basic standards," then why is the government going to such great lengths to keep him from meeting with official visitors? Call out the hypocrisy of denying Bradley Manning official visitors. Sign our letter protesting the decision to block unmonitored visits to Bradley Manning. The decision to block official visits to Bradley Manning isn't just ludicrous. It's against the rules. Marine rules clearly state that people "conducting official government business, either on behalf of the prisoner or in the interest of justice," can be allowed "official visits" not subject to monitoring by the brig. That explicitly includes Members of Congress like Rep. Kucinich. Rep. Kucinich, a member of the House Oversight Committee, has been trying to visit Manning in prison for more than two months. The Congressman repeatedly wrote to Secretary Gates and other military officials requesting a visit to investigate the allegations of torture-like conditions to which Manning has been subjected. And the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture has opened an official investigation into PFC. Manning's conditions. If it seems like a stretch to say that a member of the US Congressional Oversight Committee and the United Nations visiting a military prisoner alleging abuse does not constitute 'official government business,' that's because it is. This is one big game of semantics, with the ultimate goal being to keep the public from hearing the truth about Manning's confinement. The secrecy has to stop. Sign our petition to Secretary Gates and Commanders Choike and Barnes to stop obstructing and allow official visits to Manning. With your help, we will make sure there is nothing secret about the way the US Government is treating Bradley Manning. Thanks for all you do. Michael Whitney, Firedoglake.com The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Magda Hassan - 12-04-2011 Bradley Manning: top US legal scholars voice outrage at 'torture' Obama professor among 250 experts who have signed letter condemning humiliation of alleged WikiLeaks source
The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Carsten Wiethoff - 24-04-2011 From http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2011/04/22/obama-on-manning-he-broke-the-law-so-much-for-that-trial/ Quote:Constitutional Scholars aren't any more what they used to be... :mad: Reminds me to similar pre-convictions in the Khalid Sheikh Mohamed case. Maybe Obama intends to make it impossible to hold a civil trial and go for a military tribunal instead. Just guessing... The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Magda Hassan - 25-04-2011 And why wasn't Obama talking this talk with Bush and company's crimes? Instead we got this "Move on, look forward not backwards" crap. No one has died from any of the Wikileaks cables and maybe many saved. Millions have died from Bush and companies murderous wars and cover ups. The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Peter Lemkin - 25-04-2011 We convict them first and try them never.....torture and imprison 'em in between...how nice :darthvader: As cartoon character Pogo famously said, "We have met the enemy, and the enemy is us!" The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Keith Millea - 25-04-2011 Quote:And why wasn't Obama talking this talk with Bush and company's crimes? Instead we got this "Move on, look forward not backwards" crap. Well,the "Move On,look forward" crap,means the Bush company's crimes are also Obama's crimes now.Obama ain't sayin' nothing! Quote:No one has died from any of the Wikileaks cables and maybe many saved. Millions have died from Bush and companies murderous wars and cover ups. Which reminds me,what ever happened to the threat to release the video of the massacre of over 90 Afghan civillians?Remember,that was just after the chopper video was released.And,that video would have been 10 times more explosive than the Apache video.Did WikiLeaks think people couldn't handle it,or was there something more persuasive that Wikileaks just had to cave? :mexican: The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Magda Hassan - 25-04-2011 I'm sure it will come in good time. And I'm certainly interested to learn more as it was horrific enough when it was even first mentioned. I just think the Wikileaks people have had their hands full with releasing the cables and the fall out from that plus the rape trials plus internal sabotage and infiltration and the Twitter case. I'm sure it is still on the to do list and not forgotten. There is quite a bit of work to do before the releases. Checking veracity of material and safety of sources etc. The Inhumane Conditions of Bradley Manning’s Detention - Peter Lemkin - 27-04-2011 AMY GOODMAN: We turn right now to Dan Ellsberg. I want to turn to President Obama, who was questioned by supporters of accused U.S. Army whistleblower Bradley Manning last week at a fundraiser in San Francisco. The President's comments were recorded on a cell phone. He said that what Bradley Manning had done was different from what Dan Ellsberg had revealed a generation ago. Listen very carefully. This is a cell phone recording. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We're a nation of laws. We don't individually make our own decisions about how the laws operate. No, he's doing fine, he's doing fine; I mean, he's being courteous, and he's asking a question. He broke the law. LOGAN PRICE: You can make it harder to break the law, even to tell the truth. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Well, what he did was he dumped LOGAN PRICE: Isn't that just the same thing as what Daniel Ellsberg did? PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: No, it wasn't the same thing. What it was, Ellsberg's material wasn't classified in the same way. AMY GOODMAN: President Obama openly declaring that Bradley Manningwho has yet to stand trialhas broken the law. According to Obama, the cases are not similar because, quote, "Ellsberg's material was not classified the same way." Dan Ellsberg is on the phone with us right now, the world-renowned whistleblower who exposed the Pentagon Papers some 40 years ago. Dan, he says don't compare Bradley Manning with you. DANIEL ELLSBERG: Well, nearly everything the President has said represents a confusion about the state of the law and his own responsibilities. Everyone is focused, I think, on the fact that his commander-in-chief has virtually given a directed verdict to his subsequent jurors, who will all be his subordinates in deciding the guilt in the trial of Bradley Manning. He's told them already that their commander, on who their whole career depends, regards him as guilty and that they can disagree with that only at their peril. In career terms, it's clearly enough grounds for a dismissal of the charges, just as my trial was dismissed eventually for governmental misconduct. But what people haven't really focused on, I think, is another problematic aspect of what he said. He not only was identifying Bradley Manning as the source of the crime, but he was assuming, without any question AMY GOODMAN: Dan, we have four seconds. DANIEL ELLSBERG:that a crime has been committed. |