In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: In The Shadow of Dallas and LA (/thread-7525.html) |
In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Seamus Coogan - 04-09-2011 Zach Robertson Wrote:Hi Charles, Dear Zach. Morales was a mean dude. Where he fits into it all is interesting but people forget about the hierarchy of the time. Bill Harvey sent him to work for Shackley from out of the JM-Wave station and it was Shackley whom would be largely responsible for running Morales prior to his departure to Sth East Asia in about 66. Morales also came directly under guys like Dave Phillips whom was effectively running the MJ-12 Op. By 68, the JM Wave Station was done and dusted. Im sure you know this stuff but when people go on about Morales they often put him in a coordination position well above his station. He did have the potential to have been involved in any assassination chaffs be it JFK or RFK however. In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Zach Robertson - 04-09-2011 Seamus, I realize Morales' rank at the time of the assassination was GS 14 and when he "retired" he was a GS 15 at step 8. Technically he was not a super grade officer and technically he had superiors but to say he worked "under" others while at JMWAVE is not quite correct. His CI section was compartmentalized from the rest of WAVE and Morales successfully set up his own intelligence unit with his own trusted "cowboy" PMs. These guys routinely did what they wanted to do despite orders to the contrary and this is documented. Shackley made sure to stay out of Morales' way for the most part. There are still 2 men alive who know about how JMWAVE really worked. Zach In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Seamus Coogan - 04-09-2011 Zach Robertson Wrote:Seamus, Oh and tell me do is one of them Brad Ayers? And don't pull this Morales running the show crap I've been around the game to long buddy. In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Zach Robertson - 04-09-2011 Seamus Coogan Wrote:Oh and tell me do is one of them Brad Ayers? And don't pull this Morales running the show crap I've been around the game to long buddy. I am very impressed. In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - James Lewis - 04-09-2011 Seamus, I think you rather underestimate the rank and power of David Morales within the CIA. From the Mary Ferrell Foundation's profile of Morales. Emphasis mine: Quote:David Sanchez Morales, aka "El Indio," worked for the CIA under the cover of Army employment. He was involved in PBSUCCESS, the CIA's 1954 overthrow of the Guatemalan government, and rose to become Chief of Operations at the CIA's large JMWAVE facility in Miami. In that role, he oversaw operations undertaken against the regime of Fidel Castro in Cuba. From Someone Would Have Talked: Quote:It's also clear that like many of the men directly involved with the Bay of Pigs, Morales felt that John Kennedy was a coward and very likely a traitor to his country. Morales expressed his tremendous anger about seeing his friends butchered in remarks to both Carbajal and his lawyer and business partner, Robert Walton. Yes, he ostensibly worked under Shackley, but for the most part, Morales was his own man and did pretty much what he wanted when conditions permitted it. When you couple the above with the fact that he was also one of the main cogs in the CIA's Phoenix Program, it becomes apparent that not only was David Morales not to be trifled with, but he, along with Edward Lansdale, would be the the perfect person to at least help with the planning and operational aspects of assassinating the President. After all, he was once called the CIA's "number one hit man". In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Seamus Coogan - 04-09-2011 James Lewis Wrote:Seamus, I think you rather underestimate the rank and power of David Morales within the CIA. From the Mary Ferrell Foundation's profile of Morales. Emphasis mine: Hey Jim. I have not underestimated Morales rank. I own SWHT and I agree with Larry what's the big freaking deal here. But I really hate it when people put words in my mouth. You don't think I don't know this stuff? Give me some more respect please. But if people are going to come at me with say Bradley Ayers (and yes I know Larry used some of him in part for his book) well all I'll say is be careful. He's pals with JF and feeds him all manner of utter garbage. As I suspect guys like Doug Caddy do. But this whole rogue Morales did it BS is what Zach is trying to get at. And it is crap. As you can quite clearly see from the extract in Larry's book. In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Zach Robertson - 04-09-2011 x In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Charles Drago - 04-09-2011 Zach Robertson Wrote:First I want to say that I think the plot and cover-up are two separate things. We are in powerful disagreement here. While a number of elements of the coverup were enacted by entities not involved in the assassination conspiracy, these actions were anticipated by the Facilitators during the planning stages of the event. LHO was the perfect patsy for many reasons -- not the least of which was that he tracked back to highly secret operations (HTLINGUAL is a great example) that would be protected at ALL costs. Including burying evidence relevant to solving the crime of the millennium. Zach Robertson Wrote:The people involved in the plot wanted an invasion of Cuba but this was not to be. I do not think these supranational forces would be involved in the plot in any way whatsoever. I do think they would be involved in the cover up. SOME of the people involved in the plot expected an invasion of Cuba to follow the taking of the president. These individuals were used, abused, and offered the choice of moving on to greener pastures opened by the coup or being buried in them. To put it simply, John Kennedy would not have been murdered absent the order given by the supranational forces. Zach Robertson Wrote:I just don't see the plot being all that big, otherwise I think it would have come apart by now. It could not have been bigger. Which is why it has not yet come apart. Zach Robertson Wrote:Phil, I won't speak for Phil, but I will note that I don't read anything of the sort in his posts. Lansdale, if he were involved -- and I'm beginning to have doubts -- was, like Morales, a tool on a belt. A Facilitator. In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Charles Drago - 04-09-2011 Seamus, For the love of God, cool it. Zach, Please stay with us. Charles In The Shadow of Dallas and LA - Seamus Coogan - 04-09-2011 Somehow I had a double up. Damn it lol my reply is over the page. |