+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Sean Murphy's research deserves more (/thread-11857.html)
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Duncan MacRae - 15-09-2015
Albert Doyle Wrote:Over on the Education Forum Duncan MacRae is showing a blow-up of Prayer Man that allegedly shows overcoat buttons down the front of Prayer Man's coat. I've never seen those buttons before on any blow-up so I wonder why they're showing up now? In any case, if they are real they prove Prayer Man is not Oswald since Oswald was not wearing any long button down overcoat that day. I pretty much knew Prayer Man wasn't Oswald already anyway, but this proves it (If it's true).
Also, if true, it proves Prayer Man is not standing with arms crossed because the buttons are facing Frazier which means Prayer Man is facing sideways.
Below is almost certainly Prayer Woman. Credit initial observation to Patrick Jackson
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Albert Doyle - 15-09-2015
1) I've never seen those buttons before. So why are they showing up now and what process made them visible?
2) Your arrow reference does not show anything that I can detect as a match on the woman in the doorway. I don't see the buttons you are lining up.
3) Your scarf lady has no matching features that I can detect that make her worth comparing to Prayer Man.
4) The paranoid side of me detects a pearl collar necklace photoshopped onto Prayer Man's neck in the new shot.
5) Do you realize your arrow woman and your scarf woman are two different people and therefore can't both be Prayer Man?
.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Duncan MacRae - 15-09-2015
Albert Doyle Wrote:1) I've never seen those buttons before. So why are they showing up now and what process made them visible?1./ I don't know why they are showing up, they just do. My image is just a simple blow up of one of the usual highly pixelated frames
2) Your arrow reference does not show anything that I can detect as a match on the woman in the doorway. I don't see the buttons you are lining up.
3) Your scarf lady has no matching features that I can detect that make her worth comparing to Prayer Man.
4) The paranoid side of me detects a pearl collar necklace photoshopped onto Prayer Man's neck in the new shot.
5) Do you realize your arrow woman and your scarf woman are two different people and therefore can't both be Prayer Man?
.
2./ They are not meant to represent a match, only to show that some women wore long coats with visible buttons on that day in Dallas.
3./ I see matches, you don't, that's fine.
4./ If any Photoshop work was done on the image, which I don't detect, it wasn't me, and I don't see a pearl collar necklace.
5./ The button woman is not meant to represent Prayer Woman.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Albert Doyle - 15-09-2015
Duncan,
I don't see how you couldn't automatically detect that scarf woman can't be Prayer Man because the white-colored scarf automatically conflicts with Prayer Man's dark hair.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Duncan MacRae - 15-09-2015
Albert Doyle Wrote:Duncan,
I don't see how you couldn't automatically detect that scarf woman can't be Prayer Man because the white-colored scarf automatically conflicts with Prayer Man's dark hair.
The top back of the head / hair section of Prayer Woman's head is not visible in any of the pixelated frames, so any analysis of the issue raised is subjective.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Albert Doyle - 15-09-2015
Duncan MacRae Wrote:The top back of the head / hair section of Prayer Woman's head is not visible in any of the pixelated frames, so any analysis of the issue raised is subjective.
No way. That's an incompetent analysis that automatically disqualifies you.
Prayer Man obviously has dark hair covering his head. If you look at your scarf woman she has 2/3rds of her head covered by white scarf. There's just no way that would not be visible on Prayer Man.
Jesus Duncan. Learn how to analyze photos.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Duncan MacRae - 15-09-2015
Albert Doyle Wrote:Duncan MacRae Wrote:The top back of the head / hair section of Prayer Woman's head is not visible in any of the pixelated frames, so any analysis of the issue raised is subjective.
No way. That's an incompetent analysis that automatically disqualifies you.
Prayer Man obviously has dark hair covering his head. If you look at your scarf woman she has 2/3rds of her head covered by white scarf. There's just no way that would not be visible on Prayer Man.
Jesus Duncan. Learn how to analyze photos.
~~
Absolute nonsense, the view of the scarf lady's scarf starts from behind her ears..................sheesh
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Bob Prudhomme - 15-09-2015
I thought trolls weren't allowed on this forum.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Jim DiEugenio - 16-09-2015
I don't understand it either.
Just because Albert brings it up, he is allowed to jump on?
Uttering such obvious BS also.
Sean Murphy's research deserves more - Bart Kamp - 16-09-2015
.