![]() |
|
Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... (/showthread.php?tid=11118) |
Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Tracy Riddle - 31-07-2013 Jim DiEugenio Wrote:I did a talk tonight at a book store with a pretty sophisticated crowd. Doesn't the Bronson film show (from a distance) the follow-up car right before the head shot, and no one in the car is standing? Fortunately for Menninger & Donahue, Hickey is dead and can no longer sue them. Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Albert Rossi - 31-07-2013 Tracy Riddle Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:I did a talk tonight at a book store with a pretty sophisticated crowd. As far as I can remember, there is no photographic confirmation for this "hypothesis" (if it merits that characterization) other than the photo of the follow-up car with Hickey holding the AK-47, after it has gone under the Triple Underpass and entered the Stemmons Freeway. Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Jim DiEugenio - 31-07-2013 If I recall correctly, Groden pointed this out to Menninger back in the nineties. They went ahead with the book anyway. That shows you what an agenda some people have. BTW, I have to say, that was a slickly done book. It was well written, and it had some neat information in it. THey usually put some good packaging around the disinfo, right. No matter how simple or how extreme it is. The other end would be Waldron and Hartmann. Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Jim DiEugenio - 31-07-2013 OMG, Tom Wilson. Only Nigel Turner could buy into this guy's methodology. I will never forget what Milicent Cranor once said of him: "Tom Wilson could not find a hunk of metal in a Pittsburgh steel factory." Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Albert Rossi - 31-07-2013 Jim DiEugenio Wrote:OMG, Tom Wilson. LOL Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Charles Drago - 31-07-2013 Albert Rossi Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:1. Regarding your hypothesis that J. D. Tippit very well may have been the "Badge Man" figure allegedly firing at JFK from behind the picket fence... I was in the Dallas ASK conference audiences for Wilson's first and second public presentations of his work and its products. The point I made then is the point I make now: Let us simply conduct a series of impartial tests of his machinery and methods. Use science to test science. It works, or it doesn't work. Or both. For reasons that perhaps Peter Lemkin can speak to in detail, there are no public records of any such tests having been conducted. Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Magda Hassan - 31-07-2013 Charles Drago Wrote:[quote=Magda Hassan]Don't forget your dear friend who taught 'logic' in Minnesota Professor James Fetzer. Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Nathaniel Heidenheimer - 31-07-2013 Shit Ocean has started...http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/news/gladwells-folly-did-a-secret-service-man-shoot-jfk/#comments Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Magda Hassan - 31-07-2013 Nathaniel Heidenheimer Wrote:Shit Ocean has started...http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/news/gladwells-folly-did-a-secret-service-man-shoot-jfk/#commentsIt's been all over the internet. Daily Mail in the UK, Greece. Mission accomplished. Huffington has someone claiming Hickey did it... - Albert Rossi - 01-08-2013 Charles Drago Wrote:Albert Rossi Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:1. Regarding your hypothesis that J. D. Tippit very well may have been the "Badge Man" figure allegedly firing at JFK from behind the picket fence... Something I also wondered about: on what basis does Phillips make the assertion that this is a technique that has legal validity? Quote:In retirement, Tom supplemented his income by serving as a consulting technical expert in criminal law cases where his image processing work was accepted as hard evidence in American courts of law (p. 240). Unless this is a subtly misleading sentence (e.g., "his image processing work" does not strictly refer to the kind of image processing the book pretends to show), it would seem that law courts have granted scientific validity to this technique. But Phillips is not forthcoming as to the basis for this claim, nor does he cite specific cases. Is this simply malarkey? |