+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: I call this topic "Standing my Ground" (/thread-14552.html)
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Tracy Riddle - 07-03-2016
Scott, if your knowledge of this subject is so poor that you don't know what Johnny Brewer's storefront looks like, and have to be educated about it by the likes of DVP, then I have to question the depth of your research on any other aspect of it (aside from your dad's personal experiences).
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Tracy Riddle - 07-03-2016
No one is questioning your right to express your opinion. But it would be a good idea for a published author to have a broader and deeper knowledge of a subject, and be willing to learn from the work of other researchers who have spent decades on this subject, and related topics like Vietnam, the Cold War, the CIA, etc.
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Scott Kaiser - 07-03-2016
Tracy Riddle Wrote:No one is questioning your right to express your opinion. But it would be a good idea for a published author to have a broader and deeper knowledge of a subject, and be willing to learn from the work of other researchers who have spent decades on this subject, and related topics like Vietnam, the Cold War, the CIA, etc.
I wholeheartedly agree, without a doubt and without a second thought, if the providing information is [true], but, if the providing information is [untrue] and therefore needs to be corrected should it not? Or, do we continue to provide dis-information? To [human] is to error.
This is a perfect example of what I mean:
I did not copy his entire post only because I couldn't read past his first point of trying to sound intelligent. He says:
"1) All researchers are not created equal. Some of the researchers you have engaged here and on the DPF have been at this for a long time and, despite my occasional disagreement with certain interpretations or conclusions, they have earned their gravitas and respect, they have made their bones and chops. You're a relative newbie at this and have not yet earned an automatic gravitas. By all means, make your claims, but they would be better accepted if you do it with more humility. This discussion is at a considerably higher level than a schoolyard fight."
I suppose I didn't make my claims with "humility?" In the beginning of my post, I said, Jim, "this is partially true", then, I explained myself in-full. I'm the one who immediately gets attacked by the opposing idiots is that not humble enough? Sounds to me that if it's not their way it's the highway. I may not be humble when it comes to providing facts to prove my case, but then again, they're two faced.
I would like to point out that in his post, I had no earthly idea that we were to suppose to provide interpretations and/or conclusions and present them as factual evidence! Slaps my forehead, now I know!
Lastly, I have no idea what he means when he says I'm a "newbie" when none of these people lived the life I have, now, I find that ironic. I suppose you have to "earn" your way into a spot that I've lived a life of, now that I find funny as hell. I wonder what some of their bona-fides are?
The last sentence I find particularly hilarious when at first, they could not except my "humble" post, now isn't that funny?
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Scott Kaiser - 07-03-2016
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott, if your knowledge of this subject is so poor that you don't know what Johnny Brewer's storefront looks like, and have to be educated about it by the likes of DVP, then I have to question the depth of your research on any other aspect of it (aside from your dad's personal experiences).
Tracy, can you please tell me what the exterior of the "Malls of America" looks like without viewing a photo? Just because I may not be [up to speed] on a storefront does not mean I'm always wrong, I rest my case. Your question, is very questionable, and it almost discredits everything you believe.
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Scott Kaiser - 07-03-2016
Here's the facts, I even [admitted] I was wrong, can anyone else? I rest my case.
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Tracy Riddle - 07-03-2016
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott, if your knowledge of this subject is so poor that you don't know what Johnny Brewer's storefront looks like, and have to be educated about it by the likes of DVP, then I have to question the depth of your research on any other aspect of it (aside from your dad's personal experiences).
Tracy, can you please tell me what the exterior of the "Malls of America" looks like without viewing a photo? Just because I may not be [up to speed] on a storefront does not mean I'm always wrong, I rest my case. Your question, is very questionable, and it almost discredits everything you believe.
If the Mall of America had anything to do with the JFK assassination, and Oswald's alleged escape route, I would sure as hell know what it looked like. Otherwise, it is irrelevant. The idea that anything I said above "almost discredits everything believe" is completely nonsensical and irrational.
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Tracy Riddle - 07-03-2016
Scott, I'm trying to be nice, but this is not all about you and your dad, it's about a much bigger event, of which your dad may have been a small (compartmentalized) player. I don't know if you've read any of the major researchers on this subject, but if you want to broaden your understanding about the big picture, it would be good to do so.
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Scott Kaiser - 07-03-2016
Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Scott, if your knowledge of this subject is so poor that you don't know what Johnny Brewer's storefront looks like, and have to be educated about it by the likes of DVP, then I have to question the depth of your research on any other aspect of it (aside from your dad's personal experiences).
Tracy, can you please tell me what the exterior of the "Malls of America" looks like without viewing a photo? Just because I may not be [up to speed] on a storefront does not mean I'm always wrong, I rest my case. Your question, is very questionable, and it almost discredits everything you believe.
If the Mall of America had anything to do with the JFK assassination, and Oswald's alleged escape route, I would sure as hell know what it looked like. Otherwise, it is irrelevant. The idea that anything I said above "almost discredits everything believe" is completely nonsensical and irrational.
Okay, fair enough, would you consider the alleged murder weapon allegedly purchased from a Postal Money Order that's also identified with the alias found in Oswald's wallet to be an important piece of evidence? If so, can you tell me the middle initial of Alek Hidell without looking it up or someone telling you? Can you see my conundrum here? Or, must we really play these little charade's?
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Scott Kaiser - 07-03-2016
I'm sorry, I meant to say "Postal Money Order" and not post, what was I thinking?
I call this topic "Standing my Ground" - Scott Kaiser - 07-03-2016
His middle initial was "J" Hope you have a great day Tracy, I'm off to pay a parking ticket before it starts to rain, and tomorrow I have a very important meeting.