+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Challenge (/thread-14618.html)
Challenge - Albert Doyle - 30-03-2016
Good thing we've been warned to avoid conjecture and speculation...
Challenge - Alan Ford - 30-03-2016
With a combined score of (0) we can only speculate some specifics may actually be produced at some point between the trailing tandem of prayer man and prayer person.
However, with Prayer Man, we have more than a few specifics already, including multiple people putting the wrongfully accused right where he says he was. There's a reason for that.
Let's update the Challenge Scoreboard...
Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. Thus the tally reads...
The wrongfully accused (5) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Bill Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
"They saw no one there" (There's a reason for that)
Challenge - Albert Doyle - 30-03-2016
It's pretty clear Alan is an ROKC proxy who is going to mention "Out front" no matter what he's shown...
Challenge - Alan Ford - 31-03-2016
Wrongfully accused: "out with Bill Shelley in front"
Wow! multiple specifics in one statement. Or, Are we to believe Captain Fritz was interrogating himself?
Speaking of specifics, let's revisit our Challenge Board ----->
Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. Thus the tally reads...
The wrongfully accused (5) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Bill Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
"They saw no one there" .... While Mr. Truly is pretending not to see "no one there" (any one in particular, Mr. Truly?) Here's an in depth review relative to Prayer Man offering more than a few specifics of its own -----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
Challenge - Alan Ford - 31-03-2016
*Day Three (3) of the Challenge…finds
Still no specific data to date on prayer woman or prayer person. There's a reason for that.
Prayer Man, however, picks up yet another mention. This one courtesy of the late Kent Biffle (RIP), a Dallas Morning News reporter, who was the initial reporter on the scene immediately during the assassination aftermath. Let's take a look at what Mr. Biffle shared about his observations as he scribbled away in his notepad while trailing Mr. Truly ---Ã
"The [TSBD] superintendent [Truly] would recall later that he & a policeman met Oswald as they charged into the building after the shots were fired."
*credit Ace card researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean) for producing the above three years ago
Of course, as with everything else in this case to do with framing an innocent patsy, this tidbit also fell to script-revision-evidence-tampering in order to accommodate the BIG lie.
With Mr. Biffle's additional observation in mind, let's look at the Challenge tally board --Ã
Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. There's a reason for that.
The wrongfully accused (7) (including, but not limited to, Where were you? "out front"; With who? "Bill Shelley"; and, of course, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
"They saw no one there" .... (any one in particular, Mr. Truly?)
Challenge - Albert Doyle - 31-03-2016
Alan Ford Wrote:*Day Three (3) of the Challenge…finds
Still no specific data to date on prayer woman or prayer person. There's a reason for that.
I totally agree.
It was because Prayer Man was a non-descript woman tucked in to an obscure shadowy spot in the Depository front entrance portal who didn't draw any attention to herself because there was no reason for any such attention.
This ROKC shilling shouldn't be allowed.
Challenge - Alan Ford - 31-03-2016
"The [TSBD] superintendent [Truly] would recall later that he & a policeman met Oswald as they charged into the building after the shots were fired."
*credit Ace card researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean) for producing the above three years ago
There's more to come...just still waiting for any specifics related to prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, etc. to be shared given the open Challenge to produce as much. So far, (0), but the day is still young.
Remember folks, only one entity of the possible choices above was interrogated by Captain Fritz. We know Captain Fritz didn't jot down a notation in his interrogation notes to suggest he himself was, quote, "out with Bill Shelley in front"
In addition, in at least seven other instances, Prayer Man is positioned precisely where he says he was. There is a reason for that.
Challenge - Alan Ford - 01-04-2016
One final check of the tally board before settling in tonight to see if any specific data has been finally developed for prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, etc. on the eve of Day Four (4) of this Challenge.
Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. There is a reason for that.
Please note the italics ---->
"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside and met me at the door and went in with me. Shortly after I entered the building I confronted Oswald. The man who identified himself as the superintendent said that Oswald was all right, that he was employed there. We left Oswald there, and the supervisor showed me the way upstairs. We couldn't get anyone to send the freight elevator down." --DPD Motorcycle Officer Marion Baker
Certainly corresponds with ----->
"The [TSBD] superintendent [Truly] would recall later that he & a policeman met Oswald as they charged into the building after the shots were fired."
*credit Ace card researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean) for producing the above three years ago, as recorded by Mr. Biffle (Kent), a reporter of the Dallas Morning News.
Wrongfully accused: "out with Bill Shelley in front"
Or was Captain Fritz interrogating himself?!
Barring any late entries w/specifics about prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, etc., the final tally heading into Day Four of this Challenge reads:
The wrongfully accused (7) (including, but not limited to, Where were you? "out front"; With who? "Bill Shelley"; and, of course, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
"They saw no one there" .... (any one in particular, Mr. Truly?)
An in depth analysis relative to Prayer Man is just a click away ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
Only lying treasonous cowards shoot an unarmed representative of the People and then frame an innocent party.
Challenge - Ray Mitcham - 01-04-2016
Nice post, Alan.
Don't expect any specific details from Conehead.
Challenge - Albert Doyle - 01-04-2016
Yeah, details like unanswered math.
I'm surprised that an ROKC branch is being tolerated on this site.
Mitcham is ignoring that 2 gif film clips both showed Prayer Man at the front of the landing...