+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: The Anti-James Douglass Appears (/thread-857.html)
The Anti-James Douglass Appears - Seamus Coogan - 20-01-2011
Keith Millea Wrote:Quote:Hahahaha I feel a sense of melodramatic satisfaction once more thanks mate. Did you serve in the army by any chance?:unclesam:
I served,I saw,and I cuss way too much! :mexican:
:hobbyhorse:
Makes two Keith mate. What :curtain: theatre did you serve? In Vietnam? It's always cool too talk to a vet. But I understand it's not so cool for Vets to talk themselves. You guys saw a whole heap of stuff I don't have any business prying into. But how well do you feel Jim Douglas handled the Vietnam stuff? I agree with Jim Di (yes we do disagree from time to time lol) CD and others that its a real strength of the book that the Anti Douglas forces really can't get a lid on.
The Anti-James Douglass Appears - Jan Klimkowski - 20-01-2011
Seamus - without divulging any deep confidences, you should be aware that Charles - as the possessor of an eloquent pen - is not a natural fan of "smilies" or "emoticons".
Fortunately, on this matter, the majority prevailed..... :wirlitzer:
The Anti-James Douglass Appears - Keith Millea - 20-01-2011
Yes,it was Vietnam.Seamus,I'm not a JFK researcher,and have not read the Douglas book.I've inserted myself into the JFK arena only a handful of times,and have managed to stuff my mouth with both feet in a few of those occasions.I'm going to leave these issues for the experts.I'm all ears..........
The Anti-James Douglass Appears - Seamus Coogan - 21-01-2011
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Seamus - without divulging any deep confidences, you should be aware that Charles - as the possessor of an eloquent pen - is not a natural fan of "smilies" or "emoticons".Thats quite a laugh I thought with the ribald nature of them they would be right up his alley so to speak. I should've learn't a long time ago its always the quiet ones lol!
Fortunately, on this matter, the majority prevailed..... :wirlitzer:
The Anti-James Douglass Appears - Seamus Coogan - 21-01-2011
Keith Millea Wrote:Yes,it was Vietnam.Seamus,I'm not a JFK researcher,and have not read the Douglas book.I've inserted myself into the JFK arena only a handful of times,and have managed to stuff my mouth with both feet in a few of those occasions.I'm going to leave these issues for the experts.I'm all ears..........
Well its cool Keith there's way to many big mouths like me running around anyhow. Its great to know people wanna listen on the forums and soak it in. As I was saying about the Smilies it's always the quiet ones. But yeah man the experts say read that book bud. In fact its not the experts good is compelling you too lol.
Be interesting to get your feed back on it mate.
The Anti-James Douglass Appears - Bernice Moore - 24-01-2011
Paul Rigby Wrote:hey paul, must be one or tother or similar not only are they ready to go, but have been and are armed with the feeding of their information, they simply copy and post in reply or in thread starters, like fountains, with reams of disinformation, all typed up, seconded and presented, and some with even the following arguments known of course, to be asked,all dispersed with answers within their posts, and all supplied for free of course, :lol:but paid for by american tax dollars...:jawdrop::jawdrop:bMagda Hassan Wrote:Somewhere there must be a school where these types learn their arts of deceptive arguing?
Langley High, or MIT?