Albert Doyle Wrote:Carolyn Arnold saw 'Oswald' (most likely Harvey) in the 2nd floor lunch-room. The ROKC deniers are saying claims that the 2nd floor lunch-room was not used by workers trumps Carolyn Arnold's own lying eyes.

Oswald wasn't a 'worker' per say. He was a CIA operative working in a building overseen by Byrd and Truly. Two persons closely connected to the right-wing cabal that assassinated Kennedy.

Quote:.....a CIA operative working in a building overseen by Byrd and Truly

Albert Doyle Wrote:Byrd being connected to the same Civil Air Patrol that Ferrie and Oswald were members of has nothing to do with anything I'm sure and we can just stick to your admonishments that you can trust FBI. Parker also trusts FBI.

Albert Doyle Wrote:Parker apparently doesn't realize that arguing himself into the admission that Oswald was in the lunch-room as a CIA operative is the same as admitting Oswald was in the lunch-room as a CIA operative, and was seen by Carolyn Arnold. Do we believe Carolyn Arnold or the make it up as he goes along bs artist Greg Parker who demands "substantiation"?


This is why Parker is a psychopath. A research acrobat who chases his tail in such an artful manner that he ends up hanging by his own petard.



Scully, Mary Pinchot Meyer was killed by CIA black op.

Quote:

The Autodaf of Lisa Pease and James DiEugenio Tomas de Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition return in a new era of suppression of freedom of thought and adherence to a rigid dogma - namely their own prejudices!

By Peter Janney
July 6, 2012

Recently by Peter Janney: Mary's Mosaic: Chapter One
Lisa Pease's six-page diatribe against me and my recent book Mary's Mosaic is, at the very least, a marvel of subjective distortion and shoddy criticism, fueled by her own personal vendetta that someone dared not follow her as she, and her partner James DiEugenio, have attempted over the years to appoint themselves as the ultimate "guardians of truth" in all things Kennedy (see here).
And as usual, Lisa Pease's only fallback source in her vain attempts to substantiate anything she writes is James DiEugenio, whom she seems to always regard as unassailable. Together, nothing that these two write can ever be challenged or debated without one of them launching some kind of personal diatribe against anyone who challenges it, establishing a different opinion.
.....It doesn't seem to matter to Pease that "Mitchell" has never been able to be located since the trial, or that his known address during that time was documented as a "CIA safe house" by three separate former CIA employees. At the time of trial in July 1965, Mitchell told a reporter that he had since retired from the military and was now a mathematics instructor at Georgetown University yet no record of his employment there could ever be located, nor was there ever any bona-fide military service record located for "Mitchell," either in the Pentagon where he was listed in the directory at the time of the murder, or in the main military data base in St. Louis. This was thoroughly researched by the Peabody Award-winning journalist Roger Charles, as discussed in my book, a fact that Pease fails to mention in one of her many deliberate omissions, which also included Damore's consultation with L. Fletcher Prouty (as documented by Damore's attorney James H. Smith) to finally understand who "Mitchell" was, before Damore confronted him. Of course, Lisa Pease is entitled to whatever flawed point of view she wants to embrace, but she's not entitled to her own set of facts.......

Quote:September 5, 2014 http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/09/05/the-murder-of-mary-pinchot-meyer/
The Murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer
On this edition of Real Politik James is joined by Peter Janney, author of Mary's Mosaic: The CIA Conspiracy to Murder John F. Kennedy, Mary Pinchot Meyer, and Their Vision for World Peace.

.....In January 2014 Janney deposed William Mitchell as part of a wrongful death civil lawsuit to procure information on Mitchell's potential responsibility for Meyer's murder. "I am still in the last stages of my research that I hope will pull the pieces together that may point to the fact that [William] Mitchell had a specific role in this event on October 12, 1964. But I do want to make clear that I no longer believe that he was the actual assassin."

Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Oh, crap.

You mean I now have to drop that tongue in cheek part of my review where Mitchell uses a special CIA fast acting ointment to change his complexion from Caucasian to African American in a few seconds? (And Poor Michael Jackson went through a process that took him months, maybe years.) I thought that was one of the funniest things I have ever read. I mean I had a hard time trying to make it satiric.

BTW, its funny that Janney only goes after Lisa and not me. But further, it wasn't Lisa who pointed out all the stuff wrong about making MM a muse, when in fact JFK was so sophisticated about Foreign policy in 1961 that he was light years ahead of anybody in is cabinet--let alone some art student. I did that in my review. Which to my knowledge, he does not comment on.

Albert Doyle Wrote:Greg Parker is a psychopath. He's now on ROKC explaining why Carolyn Arnold's memory of seeing Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch-room, he claims was off-limits to workers, was wrong. As if people would take seriously his Rube Goldberg explanations around the obvious evidence.


Parker is a crank who honestly tries to get away with saying that Carolyn Arnold seeing Oswald sitting at the lunch-room table is due to the well-known unreliability of witness testimony. He's honestly trying to get away with that. As if Carolyn Arnold somehow mis-remembered seeing Oswald as she ducked in to the lunch-room for a drink from the water fountain.



He's either Cinque-level certifiable or an op.



There's nothing untoward about Oswald sitting in the lunch-room. The plotters knew the employees would be outside watching the president. Oswald being in the lunch-room keeps him away from the upstairs where he was being framed. What is unreasonable is thinking with all the known conspiracy involved here that they would let Oswald stray out to the front steps. Greg obviously has no sense of self exposing irony when he says "What under-cover operative blows his cover by not playing his cover role to the max."