Quote:Albert Doyle
Member

Join DateSep 2010Posts4,700

The opposition is being allowed to lie and deny in public that Frazier's ear is visible in Darnell. Anyone can look at Darnell and see the clear division between Frazier's hair and his skin on his head. There's an undeniable skin slot on Frazier's image in Darnell for his ear as delineated by his skin/hair border. When the opposition is cornered by this argument it lies and says the ear is too small. Rubbish, anyone can see it.

If we go to Oswald's mugshot, we can see that he has a very prominent ear that would have to show similarly as Frazier's did. However we don't see that in Darnell. We see a dark mass of hair where both Oswald and Frazier would have an ear showing. The fact Frazier's ear shows up plainly in Darnell proves Darnell's equipment was capable of capturing this. So it then becomes obvious that it should have captured Oswald's ear too, if Oswald was Prayer Man.

The opposition's inability to answer this easy to see evidence should tell you all you need to know. If I had one wish it would be that people would answer good evidence like their Deep Political ethic requires.

Quote:The opposition is being allowed to lie and deny in public that Frazier's ear is visible in Darnell.

Quote:The opposition is being allowed to lie

Albert Doyle Wrote:I wish Scott had DiEugenio and Hancock working with him as a team.

Scott Kaiser Wrote:

LR Trotter Wrote:

Lauren Johnson Wrote:

LR Trotter Wrote:Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

The decision by the Mods was that Scott spent a lot of time trolling other threads but was also capable to contribute. The decision was to put up with his bullshit. I would have voted him off the island if we had voted.

Mr. Trotter, my counsel is to ask Scott specific questions concerning his area of knowledge or just stay out of this thread.

I agree it's not funny -- not at all. But Scott can troll all he wants in this thread. And in theory he's all about researching and honoring his father.

Cheers.

With all due respect Mr or Ms Johnson, I am sure your counsel is well intended, but "his area of knowledge" may or may not be correct. As JFK's election, the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the murder in Dallas of JFK, all appear to be things he read and/or heard about, those are events and/or situations I remember as they occurred. But, that by all means is not an indication of expertise on my part. And, to "just stay out of this thread" was what I was trying to do. However, due to moderation of Mr Kaiser's posts, his quoting a post I made on another thread has moved to this thread, bringing my name. An irony, is the quote was his reference correction of my grammar. A posted quote, by the way, I had refrained from responding to. And so it goes, on 11/05/2016.

You're right Mr. Trotter, I have no bonafides, I'm just making all this stuff up as I go along because I heard about all these events, in-fact, I don't even know who this Frank Sturgis guy is, you got me!

Quote:With all due respect Mr or Ms Johnson

Quote:And, to "just stay out of this thread" was what I was trying to do.

Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:Shut up, Scott. You're boring us. Give us FACTS, not postulations…….. your daddy was a nasty character, and the fruit doesn't fall far from the tree, McGee….. rotten evidence !! garbage !!! try again. His photos in his briefcase???? Like Hunt on his deathbed …………. +