![]() |
Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen (/thread-12872.html) |
Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Peter Lemkin - 17-07-2014 Just to note....there are now two threads that contain parts of the discussion on this matter...so it is a bit confusing if one doesn't read each. One is here - and it is long, and only the more recent posts address this most directly - but the entire thread is germane. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Marlene Zenker - 18-07-2014 R.K. Locke Wrote:I have also lost track of the argument here. The only plausible explanation I can come up with to plant Wallace's fingerprint would be to have something assassination related to hold over LBJ's head if he were to go astray... Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Drew Phipps - 19-07-2014 I got the following brush-off from IAI: *** [TABLE="class: messageListTable, width: 99%"] [TR] [TD="class: messageSubject, colspan: 2"]Joan Mellon [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: headerLeft"]From: [/TD] [TD="class: headerRight"]Karasov, Phyllis <pkarasov@larkinhoffman.com> [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: headerLeft"]To: [/TD] [TD="class: headerRight"]'darkwhistle@aol.com' <darkwhistle@aol.com> [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: headerLeft"]Cc: [/TD] [TD="class: headerRight"]Glen Calhoun (gcalhoun@theIAI.org) <gcalhoun@theIAI.org> [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="class: headerLeft"]Date: [/TD] [TD="class: headerRight"]Thu, Jul 17, 2014 6:09 pm [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] I have reviewed your July 15, 2014 e-mail message apparently addressed to me. Joan Mellon is not a member of IAI. Further, even if she were a member, IAI has no control over speeches or presentations created by its members. IAI will not be providing you with the information you have requested. [TABLE="class: aolmail_MsoNormalTable"] [TR] [TD] Phyllis Karasov Shareholder MSBA Certified Labor & Employment Law Specialist [TABLE="class: aolmail_MsoNormalTable"] [TR] [TD]p [/TD] [TD]| 952-896-1569 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]f [/TD] [TD]| 952-842-1782 [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] www.larkinhoffman.com [/TD] [TD] [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] *** So, the question of Darby's certification goes unanswered for the moment. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Peter Lemkin - 19-07-2014 Drew Phipps Wrote:I got the following brush-off from IAI: Nice try, but as earlier mentioned, even if they were to answer whatever your questions were - that would possibly NOT answer the real question[s]. However, an answer to if he ever was a qualified member, would go some way. Remember also, there was a second print expert; however, what I've been told about him, which I can not share, is at complete odds with what Joan Mellen stated about him. Let's just say, I have been told both men were made to be very afraid and lives were tampered with. More I can't say - though I was informed. Again, I hope this full story can sometime be told - as several major players are dead and those that aren't, in the end, are not as important as the truth of dirty-tricks/covert operations/disinfo-ops and the coup d'etat we had in the USA. I will tell you this: I have been told by several persons in a position to know, both were eminently qualified - although one's status may have been 'changed' to discredit...a typical 'op'. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Jim DiEugenio - 20-07-2014 This is really getting a little nutty. Especially with this last go round with Peter and Drew. (I really don't know what Peter is talking about in that last post.) Computer print checking is now the state of the art in that field. Because it goes far in eliminating human error and bias. The error could be just carelessness or it could be the constant of wanting to do what the client wishes, which is always a danger. As was the case with Gus Russo and his "expert". If Darby was working from copies, then that may explain why he made an error, if he did. But why criticize Joan if she does not reveal her expert at this time? She has talked about this in Pittsburgh and did not reveal her expert, and she did the same in Dallas. She is clearly saving it for her book and I have little doubt she will go into great detail there. There was always a problem with this since, as Duke Lane noted, it was not done out in the open. It was done very quietly behind the scenes; and then it was announced as if it were a fait accompli, including going down to Dallas and getting in front of TV cameras, and doing the same on national TV. Again, I blame that idiot Nigel Turner for this. He should have been at pains to give this the most thorough and professional going over before putting it on television. But what do you expect from the guy who gave us Judy Baker, Tom Wilson, and Barr McClellan? If I ever met the guy I think i'd slug him. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Drew Phipps - 20-07-2014 I'm delighted to explain my actions. Mellen claims that she received "inside information" from IAI files that Darby was not "certified" as a print examiner, as stated in Darby's affidavit accompanying Darby's findings. I emailed the designated lawyer for IAI's board and asked her to disclose the same information to me, if the company's policy permitted. As you can see, she declined to do so. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Jim DiEugenio - 20-07-2014 I don't think that is what she was saying. I think she is saying that he had not renewed his certification, not that he was never certified. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Drew Phipps - 20-07-2014 This is what she said: "One day the latent print examiner called me with some other information. He had contacts at the headquarters of the organization that certified examiners and they went into the file of Nathan Darby. They discovered a note in the file. Not only was Nathan Darby not certified when he swore on that affidavit that he was, but there was a note in his file stating that should he request re-certification, that certification would be denied." Her meaning seems pretty plain to me. Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Jim DiEugenio - 21-07-2014 If he had to request re-certification, then he was once certified. So what she is saying is that he had not renewed at at the time. I mean this happens a lot. I am a teacher, the last time I had to renew my credential, I missed the deadline. So my principal had to call me in, and get me to of the classroom and send me downtown to renew my credential. The next day I got back into the room. BTW, was Darby retired at the time that he did this? Or was he still working in law enforcement? Lyndon Johnson and Mac Wallace - by Joan Mellen - Tom Bowden - 21-07-2014 Retired. From his affidavit.
|