![]() |
|
Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired (/thread-13023.html) |
Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Magda Hassan - 23-09-2014 Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there. Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Bob Prudhomme - 23-09-2014 Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there. Thou shalt not take the Evica-Drago Model lightly. Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Albert Doyle - 23-09-2014 Off-Topic: Clint Hill was on MSNBC tonight on Chris Matthews talking about the White House fence jumper. He said the jumper was not like some of the bigger conspiracies that could be plotted against the president. Gee, I wonder what he was thinking about? Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Magda Hassan - 23-09-2014 Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there. Yes, so it seems apparently..... It's a very fine model and always worth trying it out for results and GME a fine man and excellent researcher as is Charles in many ways but love a duck there is more in the world than one model and one dimension one colour etc. Groupthink and mental straightjackets are not good for enlightened research out comes. Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - R.K. Locke - 24-09-2014 Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there. Do you have any substantive criticisms of the model? I am not interested in whatever personal enmity may exist between yourself and Charles Drago but I am curious to know how you would set about delineating the various levels/dimensions of the plot without recourse to a model that is at least similarto the aforementioned. Just wondering. Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Bob Prudhomme - 24-09-2014 R.K. Locke Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there. I have found the worst way of researching the JFK assassination is to become a devotee of someone else's model. I research the evidence and draw my own conclusions. Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Tracy Riddle - 25-09-2014 "It's only a model," Terry Gilliam says in Monty Python & the Holy Grail as they stand gazing in rapture at Camelot. : :
Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Bob Prudhomme - 25-09-2014 Tracy Riddle Wrote:"It's only a model," Terry Gilliam says in Monty Python & the Holy Grail as they stand gazing in rapture at Camelot. : "Shhh...." Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Gordon Gray - 27-09-2014 The problem isn't with the model IMO. it is very similar to Fletcher Prouty's "model" if you will. The problem is the insistence that anything discussed that isn't directly related to the GME/CD cannon is playing Clue like parlor games wasting valuable message board space. It is a tool for thinking about the case, not a religion. And not a springboard for Ian Fleming like spy fantasizing. IMO if you want a spy novelist to characterize this operation, it is more likely Le Carre. Explosion and Flash before Shots Fired - Albert Doyle - 27-09-2014 I think Charles bashes people with it to make up for his own personal lack of technical ability to argue abstract evidence. That said, I still respect both Charles's wit and his model. I also think Charles makes the mistake of missing CIA's majority involvement in the conspiracy - Evica model not withstanding. |