+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Armstrong's Hypothosis - Harvey and Lee - Applied to Tippit (/thread-1052.html)
Armstrong's Hypothosis - Harvey and Lee - Applied to Tippit - Jack White - 08-02-2011
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:Just a gentle bump for a thread that is most worthy of revisiting.
Jack White: Anything new from J.A.?
Yes, I talked to John three times this week, and have had
frequent emails. He is one of the featured speakers at all
five days of Len Osanic's Hawaii conference. He has sent
me three of his five speech scripts for critiquing. They
are excellent, but I cannot share any of them until after
the conference. He is still writing parts four and five.
Jack
Are the talks going to be internetcast live or online after, for those of us for whom a flight and hotel stay in Hawaii is far out of imagination, let alone reality.....?
You need to ask Len Osanic those questions. He is organizing it.
Jack
Armstrong's Hypothosis - Harvey and Lee - Applied to Tippit - James Lewis - 17-02-2011
Charles, you do have a point about the IT and internet revolution. However, I would counter that the prevalence of Photoshop and other image manipulation programs would actually make it easier to fake an identity and hoodwink the public. Just saying...
Charles Drago Wrote:The IT Revolution, I'd say, has forced changes to the doppelganger gang's methodology.
Case in point: James Earl Ray was run through a modified doppelganger operation. The aliases chosen for him -- E. S. Galt is the prime example -- were of real-life individuals whose written descriptions were close enough to Ray's to fool investigators.
Today's easily shared-over-distance photographic images would have rendered this method moot.
CD
Armstrong's Hypothosis - Harvey and Lee - Applied to Tippit - Charles Drago - 17-02-2011
Greetings, James,
Welcome to DPF.
I take your point regarding Photoshop and other capabilities that likely make it look like crayon strokes.
But let's stick to the original context: My focus was and is on the events of the late 1960s, when the "authorities" had nothing else to go on but written descriptions.
Best,
Charles