Scott Kaiser Wrote:

LR Trotter Wrote:

Scott Kaiser Wrote:Here's an even better question for the intergalactically stupid, of the 636 times they tried to assassinate Fidel Castro who ordered it? Or, was it just planned by his assassins? SMH....


[size=12]​I make no denial of stupidity, but what is the "it" that "who" ordered? I tend to believe that if the right "who" was involved, the "it" would have occurred. My comment, as stated, in no way should indicate my approval or disapproval, expressed or otherwise, of any "it"!


[/SIZE]

​It appears as though a reply with a quote to this post has been relocated to another thread.

Okay Mr. Trotter, you win. With Mr. Johnson's blessings and approval in hopes he does not find my response offensive, repulsive or otherwise trolling, I will be more than happy to re-locate what I've said so my reply remains in the proper place. Thanking ya'll in advance, as always, I am, very truly.

What the hell am I talking about?

Quote:Mr. Trotter,

I apologize for my post being deleted, please note I had nothing to do with that. I did answer your question, and, though I may not remember word for word what I said, I will do my best to answer it, your question, in the hopes you will read it, my answer, without it, my post, gets deleted again.

Stupidity is not something that can be denied. You ask, what is the "it" that "who" ordered? I said, "who ordered it" being singular, meaning, any assassination attempt on Fidel Castro's life in calculating a daunting total number of 636 times.

Surely, not all 600 assassination attempts on Fidel Castro's life happened all at once? Did it?

With that said, did Richard Helms order any of the hits on Castro's life? Or, did Helms simply allow them, them meaning the "who" to plan, carry out and assassinate Castro?

I also distinctly remember saying the "it" was a representation of Kennedy's assassination, "it" only took one good plan, "it" only took one good shot, and "it" only took one good place to carry "it" out.

I have a lot more to say on this, and as I told someone I would not get myself involved in discussing assassination plots, I am however, responding to your question in the hopes of "it," my post not getting deleted again before you have the chance to read "it," my post. I'm not ignoring you sir.