+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised (/thread-15055.html)
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Lauren Johnson - 02-11-2016
Albert Doyle Wrote:Drago answered Jim's response. His response struck me as haughty bombast that repeated and protested Jim's contentions but didn't really answer what Jim was saying.
I think this site needs to have a good debate and would be for Drago being allowed a truce and posting ability. Though I'm sure this would be temporary since he will probably inevitably get himself moderated.
Right now I kind of side with Jim because Charles has huffed and puffed but he really hasn't disproven what Jim said. And if Evica was influenced by Gibson, what's the big deal? Why the call to dueling for such a trivial matter?
Allow me to give the probability that Drago will be invited back: it is a formula which divides zero/by infinity which is asymptotically approaching zero at twice the speed of light ... squared. Besides, he thinks you're two people and he might be right.
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Tracy Riddle - 02-11-2016
Albert Doyle Wrote:And if Evica was influenced by Gibson, what's the big deal? Why the call to dueling for such a trivial matter?
I agree. JFK researchers have been accusing each of other of stealing research since about 1965.
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Scott Kaiser - 02-11-2016
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:Drago answered Jim's response. His response struck me as haughty bombast that repeated and protested Jim's contentions but didn't really answer what Jim was saying.
I think this site needs to have a good debate and would be for Drago being allowed a truce and posting ability. Though I'm sure this would be temporary since he will probably inevitably get himself moderated.
Right now I kind of side with Jim because Charles has huffed and puffed but he really hasn't disproven what Jim said. And if Evica was influenced by Gibson, what's the big deal? Why the call to dueling for such a trivial matter?
Allow me to give the probability that Drago will be invited back: it is a formula which divides zero/by infinity which is asymptotically approaching zero at twice the speed of light ... squared. Besides, he thinks you're two people and he might be right.
Quote: he thinks you're two people and he might be right.
A formal or informal, systematic examination of discovering two names posting the same topics can only conclude one thing, that is, one person with two names, and or the possibilities of a person having a psychotic melt-down or a withdrawal of some sort which could cause the individual into having multiple personalities, but surely, he could not be two separate people? Could he?
proving my case is a lot tougher.
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Tom Scully - 02-11-2016
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:........
Quote: he thinks you're two people and he might be right.
A formal or informal, systematic examination of discovering two names posting the same topics can only conclude one thing, that is, one person with two names, and or the possibilities of a person having a psychotic melt-down or a withdrawal of some sort which could cause the individual into having multiple personalities, but surely, he could not be two separate people? Could he?
proving my case is a lot tougher.
Actually, presenting the proof in this instance is child's play.
Drew Phipps Wrote:So Albert, you admit posting on that other site under the name of "Ralph Yates"? Just curious why you would assume the moniker of an at least "partly-discredited-by-virtue-of-insanity" eyewitness to the Oswald double story. That strikes me as callous. Wasn't the use of the Ralph Yates name the topic of some other seemingly pointless post in the recent past? What are you up to?
PS: I don't believe JVB's story in the slightest, and if there are doubles showing up around here, she's one of them, according to her sometime-defender Edward Haslam...
Brian Doyle AKA an "[FONT=&]Authority concerning Jimi Hendrix's death.[/FONT]" engaged in discussion with himself posting as his sock puppets Albert Doyle and Ralph Yates.:
Ralph Yates:
Quote:"I'm an expert at this subject and have studied it deeply. Jimi culminated his activities during that last week by....blah....blah."
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Jim DiEugenio - 03-11-2016
Allow me to give the probability that Drago will be invited back: it is a formula which divides zero/by infinity which is asymptotically approaching zero at twice the speed of light ... squared.
Lauren, those seem a bit high to me.:
:
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Jim DiEugenio - 03-11-2016
I just took a gander at Drago's reply to me. Wow, talk about weak orange pekoe tea.
In fact, I think he actually made up a quote and attributed it to me. That, or he never went to college and does not know how to format for consistency.
And I have to add, he pretty much gets everything wrong about that last day plea by GME and John Judge at ASK. Including when and where it happened.
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Lauren Johnson - 03-11-2016
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Allow me to give the probability that Drago will be invited back: it is a formula which divides zero/by infinity which is asymptotically approaching zero at twice the speed of light ... squared.
Lauren, those seem a bit high to me.:
::laughingdog::
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Albert Doyle - 03-11-2016
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:And I have to add, he pretty much gets everything wrong about that last day plea by GME and John Judge at ASK. Including when and where it happened.
Good reason to debate him directly.
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Dawn Meredith - 03-11-2016
Albert Doyle Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:And I have to add, he pretty much gets everything wrong about that last day plea by GME and John Judge at ASK. Including when and where it happened.
Good reason to debate him directly.
Fine, just not here. Give it up Albert. You have no clue the time we all spent on the CD issue and how difficult the decision was- several times over some years actually. A zillion emails and it became very ugly - CD can write some very poison emails. Suffice to say the decision did not come easily or quickly and it will not be revisited. End of story.
Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised - Albert Doyle - 03-11-2016
Drago has gone into a side issue over Evica's exposure of Dodd's gun control program and how Oswald might have been involved in it.
While the issue is interesting I'm not sure how much it has to do with Evica being influenced by Gibson.